IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What Hit The Pentagon? Nothing., Listened to this yesterday

madtruth
post Jan 17 2009, 07:30 PM
Post #41





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 82
Joined: 23-December 08
Member No.: 4,041



QUOTE (Ricochet @ Jan 17 2009, 05:31 PM) *
I have always been suspitious of this beltway killer sceario. http://www.fbi.gov/page2/oct07/snipers102207.html
It happened at the right time between 10/2 and 10/24 (arrest of stupes) to ram the so called US PATRIOT act to pass and signed into law by shrub on 10/26. The hole in the trunk above the license plate would not be high enough to sight a .223 Bushmaster through, only large enough to stick the barrel out. I have a background in shooting competitions and it would be impossible to use this weapon from a trunk of a car with that small of an opening with any sort of accuracy. Use logic when dealing with these people, it was a black op.



I agree with you Ricochet. Like the Anthrax attacks, it was a black ops distraction and fearmongering event, in line with everything that ran thru this administrations brazen themes that went right over the head of the mainstreamers (mainly hypnotized Bush obssessed extreme right winged Conservatives.. or not so right winged).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
agentbluescreen
post Mar 4 2011, 06:17 PM
Post #42





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 13
Joined: 30-March 10
From: Southeast Detroit
Member No.: 4,991



QUOTE (SPreston @ May 14 2008, 11:43 PM) *
No, sorry I do not. However this photo might be of some help here or this photo here or here or here





FEMA 4524 the Back Bathroom near punchout

This is the back bathroom by the back door corridor near the punch-out hole. It is located at the back C Ring of Section 5 Wedge 2 between columns -1 and -3 between the final row of columns N-O. You can see a brick hallway wall knocked down (at right) and the bathroom mirror (back wall). This is where the urinal and garbage can originated that we see in the first, earliest, definitely not burning Punch Out hole photo. There is no or very little fire damage, just bombing and smoke damage.



What's Wrong Here?!



Note the small "silvery painted" GREEN AIRPLANE and it's fuel didn't initially get much past the middle of the D Ring due to concrete (tile block) walls on one side of most hallways!


Fig 6.2 (corrected,annotated)

This is a later picture after debris was being removed.


The mere notion that this tail thing in the alley, arranged to look like it was allegedly recovered from the D or C 1st floor near the exit hole at around J to M could be from the same plane that already looks like this at 3H is totally impossible and unbelievable.



And to top it all off we have this as well:
http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/news/2008-10-08/fake...tagon-after-911

[color=blue]So the conclusions are:

A: They were worried the substitute plane wouldn't get in deep enough to kill the auditors so used the missile to make sure the job got done forgetting about the jet fuel evidence. (We have photos of it hit 8 seconds later)
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?to...6351#msg1206351

B: Brick walls in hallways confined the fuel fire.

C: They landed AA 77 elsewhere swapped planes and executed the crew and passengers (likely by gas) moved the bodies into a fake repainted military/blackwater 737 class transport with remote piloting (a pilot wouldn't have risked the lamp poles) and sent it off to the Pentagon.

D: They likely merged the FDR's data reset the clock and deleted the extra landing and held it disabled at takeoff until a rendezvous point to make a new recording, forgetting about the telltale cockpit door data.

E: They wrecked the CVR because it was a TERCOM piloted ghost flight with a dead crew and a few bodies.

F: They had the missile ready and waiting likely on the last to land Andrews trainer jets that landed a few minutes later after being up all morning in the area (playing in N Carolina -more likely intercepting and forcing down AA 77 at Beckley all morning)

G: The crash was not as good as they thought due to the hardening but the missile propelled rear wreckage, forward, and deeper, though the fuel was already gone. It was programmed to a) destroy the the decoy, b) kill the auditors , c) kill key NOC IP and DIA intel brass who knew too much about Mujihadeen and al CIAduh and d) make that hole for them to get in through the courtyard

H: Likely they delivered the rest of the bagged burnt bodies later by other means (helicopters) along with some other identifiable Boeing parts to allay suspicions choppered in from Beckley .

I: They were collecting scratched silver painted green fuselage parts to hide the nature of the plane, especially this giant cockpit passenger compartment canopy



pentdebris.jpg The scratched-silver painted green plane - note the metal is just curled and paint scratched off on the torn ribbon part which is an outside surface


American Airlines Saving Money On Paint? Tech Ops Forum ...
24 posts - 16 authors - Last post: 7 Apr 2005
I was wondering, does AA benefit in anyway, especially cost wise, from flying their jets in almost bare metal? I saw a bare 777 on Heathrow, ...
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/t...ad.main/115120/
American's A-300s were painted gray for many years while the rest of the fleet was, and is, polished aluminum. Several years ago for whatever reason, the buses were stripped and polished also. AA believes the lack of paint is cost effective.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cosmored
post May 14 2011, 05:41 PM
Post #43





Group: Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: 22-April 11
Member No.: 5,833



I was going to start a thread on this but I figured I'd just ask here.

What does everybody think of this analysis?
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

I did some measurements and it looked like the proof was valid.

Also, the nose of the craft in this picture looks too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/w...agon1_plane.jpg

It looks to me like this photo...
http://0911.voila.net/index3.htm
(top photo)

...and the above one close the whole case. What does everybody think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zoeken
post May 18 2011, 06:01 PM
Post #44





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 66
Joined: 9-May 11
From: Hampton Roads
Member No.: 5,884



QUOTE (Cosmored @ May 14 2011, 04:41 PM) *
I was going to start a thread on this but I figured I'd just ask here.

What does everybody think of this analysis?
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

I did some measurements and it looked like the proof was valid.

Also, the nose of the craft in this picture looks too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/w...agon1_plane.jpg

It looks to me like this photo...
http://0911.voila.net/index3.htm
(top photo)

...and the above one close the whole case. What does everybody think?


This has been discussed before. I highly recommend going through some of the old posts under "Pentagon", and check out the Library on this site. Amazing amount of proof and analysis.

You need to watch this:

http://www.thepentacon.com/eyeofthestorm.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cosmored
post May 21 2011, 02:55 PM
Post #45





Group: Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: 22-April 11
Member No.: 5,833



Thanks zoeken

I looked around but I couldn't find anything with some actual measurements. Couldn't we measure it ourselves?

I'm talking about this at the James Randi forum.
http://govtloyalistsite.org/showpost.php?p=718...p;postcount=145

If anybody knows of a post with some actual measurements, could you post it here? Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cosmored
post May 22 2011, 09:27 AM
Post #46





Group: Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: 22-April 11
Member No.: 5,833



Here's my latest post from the James Randi thread.
http://govtloyalistsite.org/showpost.php?p=720...p;postcount=243

Does anyone want to check my calculations?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zoeken
post May 23 2011, 12:52 AM
Post #47





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 66
Joined: 9-May 11
From: Hampton Roads
Member No.: 5,884



QUOTE (Cosmored @ May 22 2011, 08:27 AM) *
Here's my latest post from the James Randi thread.
http://govtloyalistsite.org/showpost.php?p...p;postcount=243

Does anyone want to check my calculations?


links did not work for me
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cosmored
post May 23 2011, 04:35 AM
Post #48





Group: Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: 22-April 11
Member No.: 5,833



There must be a glitch in the system.

forums (dot) randi (dot) org/showpost (dot) php?p=7208375&postcount=243
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th October 2019 - 12:31 PM