Life After Death! Options

[lunk]

Lunk:

"but, i'm still trying to figure out what T-man is getting at, though".


You'll find it in the name of this thread, Lunk.

I'm trying to prove, with some simple logic and simple reasoning, that

the theories scientists comes up with are silly in the extreme.

Let us have no more 'expanding universes', 'black holes' and 'big bangs',

which more than anything sounds like young male 'wet-dream-fantasies'!

The human being consist of 3 aspects, namely the physical, the astral,
and the spiritual.

The astral aspect is completely interwoven with the physical body, and
the spiritual aspect envelopes and surrounds like a mantle the two lower
aspects, as long as the human spirit is still subjected to reincarnations
in the physical world.
It is the astral and the spiritual aspect that survives after the death of
the physical body.
The Thought and the Will of each individual human spirit have their main
seat in the large brain of the spiritual body, unseen while the human spirit
still live in the lower dimensions.

It will give people a better idea, when the Pyramid and the Supercircle is
explained further.

Cheers

Yes, i see. iv'e been looking into the idea that the universe is transient, to each of us, as this is how we experience life.
Although, we see it, the other way round.

[Paul]

This drawing will, i trust, give you a better understanding of the chamber's location.


(IMG:http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/1649/pyramid1.jpg)

So as i understand it this chamber has never been found is that correct?

Thanks for the drawings cheers

[lunk]

So as i understand it this chamber has never been found is that correct?

Thanks for the drawings cheers

Interesting, the whole structure can also be visualized as a tetrahedron,
with the "chamber" being the fourth point.
(where most of the lines intersect in the center)

That's a bit of an eye popper.

[Tamborine man]

So as i understand it this chamber has never been found is that correct?

Thanks for the drawings cheers

That is correct Paul.

Do you know somebody, anybody, with some diamond-drill equipment,

and a small spy-camera thing that can be send down the bore-hole??

It's only around 150 meters down on an angle, so should be a piece

of cake!

Cheers

[Tamborine man]

Interesting, the whole structure can also be visualized as a tetrahedron,
with the "chamber" being the fourth point.
(where most of the lines intersect in the center)

That's a bit of an eye popper.

Thanks Lunk, for reminding people that trying to view the drawings 3-dimensionally

certainly will give a value added bonus to the whole experience!

Cheers mate

[lunk]

Thinking about perspectives...

It is only because of time that we can see a shape from only one perspective.
How does one describe something seen from all perspectives, simultaneous?

Perhaps by drawing the essence of shape in 2 dimensions?

This way an object can be visualized, with a little thought,
in any higher dimension.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XDFT0Yv_hg

[Tamborine man]

Here is the grid that brings the Pyramid and the Supercircle into a
higher unity.

It should be noticed that one can count 37 distinct star-formations,
and the lines cutting through and forming the 'stars' makes an apex
of 37º.

The grid distance between the 'stars' is:
1^ + 2^ + 3^ + 4^ + 5^ + 6^ + 7^ + 8^ + 9^ + 10^ = 385, or
38.5 meters.

I'll come back to the primitive sketch drawing next!




(IMG:http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/2888/dsc00253s.jpg)

[Tamborine man]

I did this little dwg. about the same time the 'atom-refraction' dwg. was done,
many years ago as can be seen by the aged paper colour. Ever since it has been
pinned on my noticeboard exactly as seen below.

I had no idea why i folded the paper the way i did, but apparently there must
have been some reason to the madness, for many years later when i finished
the grid dwg. i found that by framing this grid dwg. as shown, a beautiful
relationship between the two, the old and the new, 'unfolded' nicely.

One will notice that the width of the octagon formed this way, becomes the
exact base-length of the Great Pyramid as it stands on the Giza plateau, or
rather did stand in earlier times!





(IMG:http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/3951/dsc00254c.jpg)

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 8 2010, 10:41 PM

[lunk]

Spinning a circle can make a sphere or just a ring,
depending on how it is spun.

Spinning a triangle can make a cone, or perhaps a square.

we see things as fixed static shapes, from our lone perspective, at a moment in time,
but to know an entire shape in the universe, it must be seen from all sides at once.

10 people standing around an odd shaped object will describe that one object 10 different ways. Yet, it has a universal form that is only seen from all angles.

For instance the side of a building may look like a square from the front, but different from the corner, or above.

We are each constrained to a single perspective by our existence in time.

This reminds me of a little operating system for computers.
It was called DSL. The whole OS would run a computer with full desktop, like windows, yet it was constrained down to 50 megabytes.
(That's smaller than an mp3 version of Stairway to Heaven.)

Perhaps, each one of us is sort of like that.
a limited OS with everything we need to expand into, and experience the universe.

Having a universe without an experienceor,
is like having a computer without an operating system.

just some thoughts.

[Tamborine man]

Talking about Thoughts!

The more observant readers should by now, i hope, easily have worked out

that the Great Pyramid in actual fact was built with the 'meter' as primary

unit, 4900 years before Napoleon's servants came up with this unit in 1793.

The Architect and the builder of the Pyramid was of course unaware of this

unit standard, but used instead a unit called 'Remen' which was exactly of a

370 mm or 37 cm length.

It was from this primary unit of 37 cm that they developed a secundary unit

which we know by the name 'Royal Cubit', of length 52.3 cm, and is simply

the length of the diagonal of a square with sides 37 cm.


So when reading this, please keep in mind the above grid of 37º apex, and 37

counted 'stars' in the overall grid!


Also note that a length of 2 Remen added to a "lazy" 1/2 Royal Cubit, would

become a length of 370mm + 370mm + 260mm = 1000mm or 1 meter.

Just a Thought, and no more!


Cheers

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 10 2010, 05:19 AM

[lunk]

Ah, the cubit, i thought it was about 18 inches a side...

i hadn't thought of it as metric, half a meter.

Half our measurements, are in imperial and the other half, metric.
its very frustrating.
temperature is Celsius, distance is kilometers, but dimensions (pipes, lumber, insulation) are in inches,
and fireplaces are rated in British Thermal Units.
And of course eggs are still in dozens.

i still haven't figured out metric air pressure,
luckily, tires have both ratings.

Then there is time, seconds, minutes, 24 hours in a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year...

i had a thought that temperature should be measured from the melting point of ice, (0), to the densest temperature point of water,(4), making the division unit for temperature, 4 degrees Celsius.

Boiling water would then be at 25 Lunk degrees.
In this scale one could easily estimate the temperature,
without a thermometer.

[Tamborine man]

"....
Boiling water would then be at 25 Lunk degrees.
In this scale one could easily estimate the temperature,
without a thermometer.
...."


Psst Lunk,

just thought to let you know quietly that the words 'lunk' and 'lunken'
in the danish language translates to 'lukewarm' or 'tepid' in english.

That's why i'm always giving you a capital L ! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Cheers

[lunk]

"....
Boiling water would then be at 25 Lunk degrees.
In this scale one could easily estimate the temperature,
without a thermometer.
...."


Psst Lunk,

just thought to let you know quietly that the words 'lunk' and 'lunken'
in the danish language translates to 'lukewarm' or 'tepid' in english.

That's why i'm always giving you a capital L ! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Cheers

sorry, i went a little off topic,
but i think it might be important to figure out this world,
prior to figuring out the afterlife.

It may be that we are from a higher dimension, and existing in
a limited volume and time.
When we are really made from, unlimited volume,
and exist outside of time.

[Tamborine man]

sorry, i went a little off topic,
but i think it might be important to figure out this world,
prior to figuring out the afterlife.

It may be that we are from a higher dimension, and existing in
a limited volume and time.
When we are really made from, unlimited volume,
and exist outside of time.

In actual fact you're absolutely perfectly right.

The great problem many people find themselves with, is how to do
the very difficult "jump" from a mere belief system, into the land of
total certainty; as the good man S. K. Kierkegaard wrote so
passionately about.

Or, the same as the 'mystics' and 'sages' urges one to do, by daring
to pass across the threshold between the two pillars Jachin and Boaz.


Here is how the transcendental world responds to this question:

".......
Do humans have a clear-cut standard for evaluating “spiritual truths”?

The perfect calm and peace that fills the minds of spiritually advanced humans when they have found what they seek is the standard by which they intuitively recognize the truth, for such calm and peace will always stand in contrast to the unease of uncertainty and falsehood.

It is rare for people to whose physical bodies young and undeveloped spirits are bound to be able to feel this, the exalted calm and peace of the eternal truths. As these people are so dependent on the world of Darkness in which they live, it is difficult for their undeveloped thought to distinguish between the true and the false; therefore, they rarely search for spiritual truths themselves but are content to walk the beaten and familiar paths of the herd. Blindly they follow in the footsteps of their leaders, believing as eternal divine truths all that these leaders proclaim—even if such assumptions have nothing to do with the truth.

It requires great spiritual maturity to be able from one’s innermost self to weigh, measure and recognize the proper value of the spiritual truths.
......."

So you should have no real problems with this act, Lunk!

Cheers


PS!
Just a little after-thought re. the number 37.

The ideal body temperature also turns out to be this number,
but as 37 degrees Celcius!

A coincidence?? Hardly! No chance, really!

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 10 2010, 10:08 PM

[Tamborine man]

Back to the Pyramid.

On this drawing you'll see the Lotus flower in the middle.

As humankind evolve, the Lotus flower rise in step with this development

up along the central vertical core line.

At some stage the innermost flower petal, depicted as a Vesica Pisces

and Rhombus, will embrace and perfectly surround both the King's and

the Queen's chambers.

This will lead us next to a little more elaboration about the significance

of the Supercircle!


(IMG:http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/7987/dsc00227wj.jpg)


Cheers

[lunk]

It's the coincidences that are the backbone structure of the universe.

Something i've noticed is what i call, convergences.
Points in time, for instance, where everybody you know, shows up unpredictably, in the same place, at once.

The chance meeting of others,
are really the solid joints of your universe.

Like i think i tried to point out earlier,
each one of us is the lone creator, and experienceor of our universe, and without that point of existence, our universe ceases to exist for us.

i know, it seems backwards.

We are brought up thinking it is entirely the other way around.

We are not the creator, just a part of natures' creation,
and the universe carries on without us.

That's a huge paradigm shift,
or i guess one could say,
leap of faith.

[Tamborine man]

Yes Lunk,
how many times hasn't it happened that one suddenly thinks about somebody,
and a moment later the phone rings and that somebody is on the other end of
the line!!

here is a simpler grid drawing of the Supercircle.
The measurements apply only to the grid itself.


(IMG:http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/7994/dsc00241ej.jpg)



And here is a link to a short essay about Piet Hein. Please read or even if just skimming!

http://www.piethein.com/usr/piethein/Homep...D0?opendocument

Cheers

[lunk]

Good read!

There was a day, a few years ago, when i guess the sun and the moon were in gravitational equilibrium, and an egg would stand on end on a solid smooth surface, without cracking it. But only on that one day.
i heard them talking about it on the local radio station, so i tried it, and sure enough the egg stood on its' end, and stayed there.

[Tamborine man]

And you took a photo of the egg, of course!! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif)


So the next question must be then, how we should symbolically view this new shape and form!
My own humble interpretation would be like this:

The Supercircle form is tending neither toward a circle nor a square, and yet it draws these two
to itself in a most beautiful and harmonious way.

We know that the Circle represents the feminine principle, and therefore also primal Thought.
On the other hand the Square represents the masculine principle, and therefore also primal Will.

From this we can go on and say that Thought again is the primary abstract female concept:
intuitive, formative and creative, and the Will is the primary abstract male concept: fructifying,
productive and dominant.

The Supercircle therefore seems to be the form that best will be able, symbolically speaking, to
unite these two principles and concepts into a harmonious whole, reflecting and complimenting
each other.

So can we with some justification then describe the Supercircle as the 'neutral' element, form,
shape, or even the "Child", which sole purpose is to unite man and woman! Yes, i personally
think so.

We could go further, and say it also would be the 'symbol' that thus could unite all other opposing
forces, like east and west, the negative and positive, the active and passive....... and, even the
ignorant and the wise!!
The possibilities could be 'endless'.


(IMG:http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/2066/dsc00248iv.jpg)


Cheers

[Tamborine man]

If anyone would like to learn how to draw the Supercircle, look at the drawing below.

To make the curves at north, east, south, west, set the compass at the opposite end
on the second largest square line, which is actually "the squared circle" line.
Draw the curve at the length spanning the 37º. (In this case 100mm).
Use 22/7 as pi to calculate the 'squared circle', for then you can get a whole number.
In this case, using diameter of 308mm, gives you a square with sides 242mm. (11^ X 2,
and dia. = 22 x 7 x 2).

To make the curves that connect the north, east, south, west curves, set the compass
on the diagonal points where the inner square and circle meet each other.

The diameter of the inner circle is a quarter of the diameter of the large circle.

Be very accurate, and use a fine sharp pencil.

Good luck.


(IMG:http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/7923/dsc00242xx.jpg)

Cheers

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 13 2010, 01:22 AM