IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9-11 Fake Video Stars - The Jstar Clones

EdWardMD
post Oct 7 2010, 05:59 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 26
Joined: 12-April 10
Member No.: 5,010



9-11 Fake Video Stars - The JSTAR Clones
By Dr. Ed Ward MD
10-1-10 http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm

Wingtips say B 767-400ERE-10A is THE CLONE USED - Unless someone has a version that matches the video better...

Why Covert Ops Must Have 'Fake' Video?

Because the videos show that a Boeing 767-400ER E-10A was the supposed Super-Powered' Commercial Airliner'.
(One of these all very similar clones is clearly seen - one version of these clones has the 'swept' back wingtips used to discredit the video as fakery by some... Boeing 767-400ER E-10A)

Even if true, unlike Proven Mini Nukes, It means nothing in the big picture of how it was actually done or actual evidence of anything other than the fact the videos are fake. Doesn't mean anything as to whether or not planes were actually used.

Of course for this premise of 'fake' video proving anything one must also believe that during planning...





note, the little blue decal up front - one of the WTC witnesses claims to have seen one on the 'plane that flew into..) BTW, eye witness testimony - the absolute LEAST valuable information.










http://www.spyflight.co.uk/767%20mc2a.htm

Someone says, since the plan is to use hijacked airliners, "Hey, let's not use real planes. Let's truck the plane parts in, crews to lay them out, people to say they saw planes, etc, et al, and just make some fake videos of planes going into the towers. Now, when we make these fake videos, instead of photoshopping in a commericial airliner with windows, we'll photoshop in the plane needed to actually do it. Everybody high fives and says, 'yeah, it's just our lives on the line for treason.' "

Next day, the moron is no longer a threat... most likely scenario, taken out by their own family out of fear they'd all be taken out. It's ludicrous on multiple levels.. Not just one.

The Ivy Flats Video is a perfect example of a camera that simply is too slow. Sure, cameras are alot faster now, so have the travel speeds. They capture irratic images AT BEST when velocity exceeds capture speed images/PIXELS distort. Fact as clearly seen on the Ivy Flats video.

It's only important if one NEEDS to disprove video evidence that a SUPER POWERED IRREGULAR SHAPED, NON WINDOWED 'COMMERCIAL AIRLINER' FLEW INTO THE WTCS - INDIRECTLY.

JSTAR E-10 MC2A
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&q=J...010%20MC2A&
um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1353&bih=830

Evaluation of Video Footage - for wtc comparisons... http://911review.org/Wiki/Wtc2PlanePod.shtml

Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvment http://www.rense.com/general92/pr911.htm Contains the link to the Ivy Flats Mini Nuke Testing.

Dr. Ed Ward, MD
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th October 2019 - 04:59 PM