Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum _ On the radio... _ Movie/video Showing Passengers Taken Off Planes & Killed

Posted by: politicstahl Nov 19 2014, 11:22 PM

I have seen online a movie in which the passengers are taken off the planes and killed. Rebekah Roth, an experienced fight attendant, has just announced on http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags/2014/11/20/methodical-illusion-series-w-rebekah-roth-part-3 that she has (independently) come to that conclusion and knows where the planes were taken.

Can anyone identify this movie? Does anyone have any comments on Phil Jayhan's information at: http://letsrollforums.com/happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?amp; ?

Thanks.

Posted by: FirstUsedBooks Nov 19 2014, 11:57 PM

QUOTE (politicstahl @ Nov 19 2014, 07:22 PM) *
I have seen online a movie in which the passengers are taken off the planes and killed. Rebekah Roth, an experienced fight attendant, has just announced on http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags/2014/11/20/methodical-illusion-series-w-rebekah-roth-part-3 that she has (independently) come to that conclusion and knows where the planes were taken.

Can anyone identify this movie? Does anyone have any comments on Phil Jayhan's information at: http://letsrollforums.com/happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?amp; ?

Thanks.

Anytime you see "Wake up," you throw a pinch of salt over your shoulder. If you see something else called "The Truth", you throw another pinch over the other shoulder.

Posted by: mick Nov 20 2014, 12:14 AM





"Operation Terror"

Posted by: Obwon Nov 20 2014, 02:01 PM

I've had enough with 911 investigations. As far as I'm concerned the evidence is in.

So, for example I've been reading posts from people who claim to have had a clear, unobstructed view of the plane that hit the south tower. Okay. Then I saw a video
on Youtube. In it a lady who works on a floor above where the UA flight struck, and
she says very clearly that she saw the plane coming towards the building, and that
she'll never forget that picture emblazoned in her memory! Get this: she cannot
forget that blue and red plane. Yeah, right!

When I first saw the south tower video, it was being played over and over on tv
by the news station. I remember the plane hit the tower catercorner angled
from south-west to north-east. The fireball emerged from the east wall of the
building, very near the southern corner. It made a very discrete hole through
which came a fireball. I remember watching it carefully (after it played endlessly
all day long), I began looking for wake vortexes of the debris I expected to come
through the wafting fireball. All I saw was a stream of burning fuel descending
through the fireball. We were told much later in the month that this stream of
burning fuel hit a woman who had just exited the building and was standing there.

So, there was no debris from either the plane or the office. Why would I be
paying such close attention? Well, I was part of the usenet debate on flight
800, the one that they said the center fuel tank took down. So after many
hours of seeing the UA crash played over and over, I just had to start looking
for anomalies, to confirm or deny what was supposedly happening. I mean, the
FBI created a video, which they tried to pass off as true, about flight 800 rising
some 9,000 feet after the nose of the aircraft came off. We thought it was the
NTSB who was responsible for that film clip, but the FBI came forward and
claimed it as a demo. But only after every technically aware person on usenet
agreed that after the nose came off the plane could not climb at all.

Anyway, planes, missiles or drones don't crash into buildings and leave no
debris, most especially when they come through the building and out the other
side. You see, the building structure would not create wake vortexes if the
fireball came behind it. Only material that came through the fireball would
have a trailing wake vortex. In none of the films you will be able to find any
wake vortexes of debris, so I'll let you draw your own conclusions.

Posted by: beijingyank Nov 22 2014, 02:21 PM

QUOTE (mick @ Nov 19 2014, 11:14 PM) *
"Operation Terror"


This is one of the best links to recent breaking news about 911.
Betty Ong's conversation has always been extremely interesting and important to the official conspiracy theorists.
The cell phone calls are a marker for concern and debate.

There was an FBI investigation into the cell phones made by Barbara Olson on flight #77, to Ted Olson, Solicitor General, revealed the phone calls did not take place.

It was Ted Olson who passed on the "knives and box cutters" story to the nation.

It's so obvious now it is a joke. The government is rogue and the terrorists are inside the Beltway.

Posted by: realitycheck77 Nov 27 2014, 03:36 PM

QUOTE (beijingyank @ Nov 22 2014, 01:21 PM) *
This is one of the best links to recent breaking news about 911.
Betty Ong's conversation has always been extremely interesting and important to the official conspiracy theorists.
The cell phone calls are a marker for concern and debate.

There was an FBI investigation into the cell phones made by Barbara Olson on flight #77, to Ted Olson, Solicitor General, revealed the phone calls did not take place.

It was Ted Olson who passed on the "knives and box cutters" story to the nation.

It's so obvious now it is a joke. The government is rogue and the terrorists are inside the Beltway.



Two AT&T operators on 9/11 got calls from a woman saying her plane had been hijacked and asked to be put through to her husband in Washington, giving the office number of Ted Olson. The calls were taken by Ted Olson's secretary who passed them through to Ted Olson. The operators rang the FBI and reported the calls and were interviewed about them.

Posted by: paranoia Nov 27 2014, 11:16 PM

QUOTE (realitycheck77 @ Nov 27 2014, 03:36 PM) *
Two AT&T operators on 9/11 got calls from a woman saying her plane had been hijacked and asked to be put through to her husband in Washington, giving the office number of Ted Olson. The calls were taken by Ted Olson's secretary who passed them through to Ted Olson. The operators rang the FBI and reported the calls and were interviewed about them.


could you please cite your source(s) for the above claims? thanks.

Posted by: NP1Mike Nov 28 2014, 01:15 AM

QUOTE (paranoia @ Nov 27 2014, 10:16 PM) *
could you please cite your source(s) for the above claims? thanks.


I'm not going to look them up myself
(I'll let Realitycheck do that) but I also researched the same info.

When I found it (although I wasn't convinced this is what actually happened) I was quite pissed with David Ray Griffin who went on a tirade proclaiming that since none of the cell calls went through (Mous trial) Barb's calls had to have been faked or her husband was a liar.
He never mentioned seat back phones as a possibility.

Some said seat back phones weren't in the 757's at that time. Others said they hadn't been completely phased out.

As others have said, hasn't there been enough proof that 9/11 was an inside job?
Do we really need each and every last lead?

For me Shanksville is enough.
The Pentagon is enough.
WTC7 is enough.
WTC1/2 "collapses" are enough.
I could go on and on and on...
We have more than enough 'smoking guns'.

Posted by: amazed! Nov 28 2014, 09:33 AM

Could not agree more--the many holes in the official story have been apparent for years now.

Impossible aviation details, impossible building collapses, molten steel for 90 days, reports of nuclear decontamination protocol enforced. Investigatory commissions 'set up to fail'.

And on, and on, and on.....

Posted by: Truthissweet Nov 28 2014, 01:43 PM

QUOTE (politicstahl @ Nov 19 2014, 10:22 PM) *
I have seen online a movie in which the passengers are taken off the planes and killed. Rebekah Roth, an experienced fight attendant, has just announced on http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags/2014/11/20/methodical-illusion-series-w-rebekah-roth-part-3 that she has (independently) come to that conclusion and knows where the planes were taken.

Can anyone identify this movie? Does anyone have any comments on Phil Jayhan's information at: http://letsrollforums.com/happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?amp; ?

Thanks.


What is your opinion on Phil's thread? Does it change any prior thought you had on 911?

Here is a link on the laughable calls to old Ted:
http://911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls

Posted by: realitycheck77 Nov 29 2014, 06:33 AM

QUOTE (paranoia @ Nov 27 2014, 10:16 PM) *
could you please cite your source(s) for the above claims? thanks.


The information and links can be found in this article.

http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/news/2011-02-10/critique-david-ray-griffin-s-911-fake-calls-theory

Posted by: politicstahl Nov 29 2014, 03:59 PM

QUOTE (politicstahl @ Nov 19 2014, 10:22 PM) *
I have seen online a movie in which the passengers are taken off the planes and killed. Rebekah Roth, an experienced fight attendant, has just announced on http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags/2014/11/20/methodical-illusion-series-w-rebekah-roth-part-3 that she has (independently) come to that conclusion and knows where the planes were taken.

Can anyone identify this movie? Does anyone have any comments on Phil Jayhan's information at: http://letsrollforums.com/happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?amp; ?

Thanks.



Please investigate Rebekah Roth's discoveries, contained in her book _Methodical Illusion_ http://www.methodicalillusion.com/ and supplemented in her series of 5 2-hour radio interviews beginning at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags...kah-roth-part-1 (et seq.)

Posted by: Truthissweet Nov 29 2014, 04:29 PM

QUOTE (politicstahl @ Nov 29 2014, 02:59 PM) *
Please investigate Rebekah Roth's discoveries, contained in her book _Methodical Illusion_ http://www.methodicalillusion.com/ and supplemented in her series of 5 2-hour radio interviews beginning at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/911falseflags...kah-roth-part-1 (et seq.)


Your blog radio link is 404. You may have copied it wrong.


'Realitycheck77': link does not work.

Posted by: excontroller Jun 10 2015, 01:36 PM

QUOTE (beijingyank @ Nov 22 2014, 01:21 PM) *
This is one of the best links to recent breaking news about 911.
Betty Ong's conversation has always been extremely interesting and important to the official conspiracy theorists.
The cell phone calls are a marker for concern and debate.

There was an FBI investigation into the cell phones made by Barbara Olson on flight #77, to Ted Olson, Solicitor General, revealed the phone calls did not take place.

It was Ted Olson who passed on the "knives and box cutters" story to the nation.

It's so obvious now it is a joke. The government is rogue and the terrorists are inside the Beltway.



Finally! Someone telling it like it is. There are TONS of anomalies in this tale. It is patently obvious that the official story is ridiculous. Most Americans now apparently believe at least that the story is false. But what is to be done? When we can not get the government to investigate themselves, they MUST ALL be complicit.

Posted by: excontroller Jun 10 2015, 01:40 PM

QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Nov 28 2014, 12:15 AM) *
I'm not going to look them up myself
(I'll let Realitycheck do that) but I also researched the same info.

When I found it (although I wasn't convinced this is what actually happened) I was quite pissed with David Ray Griffin who went on a tirade proclaiming that since none of the cell calls went through (Mous trial) Barb's calls had to have been faked or her husband was a liar.
He never mentioned seat back phones as a possibility.

Some said seat back phones weren't in the 757's at that time. Others said they hadn't been completely phased out.

As others have said, hasn't there been enough proof that 9/11 was an inside job?
Do we really need each and every last lead?

For me Shanksville is enough.
The Pentagon is enough.
WTC7 is enough.
WTC1/2 "collapses" are enough.
I could go on and on and on...
We have more than enough 'smoking guns'.



Boy, Mike, I will DRINK to THAT! If ALL Americans haven't learned ANYTHING the last 15 years about how our government behaves and does "business", NO AMOUNT of evidence will suffice.

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)