IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Nist Finally Admits Free Fall Of Wtc7

dMz
post Apr 4 2009, 11:25 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80...feature=related

This was posted at Infowars:
http://www.infowars.com/wtc7-nist-admits-freefall-the-movie/

Related threads here can be found at:

Nist Wtc7 Press Release Thurs. Aug. 21, NIST NCSTAR 1-9 & 1A
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=14257

Nist Releases Final Report On Wtc 7
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=15610

NIST's velocity function can be found in Figure 12-77 of NIST NCSTAR 1-9 (Vol. 2).

David Chandler has put together a FAQ on this:
http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf

EDIT: A related discussion may be found here:

It's Official! It's Faster than Free Fall!
http://the911forum.freeforums.org/it-s-off...e-fall-t91.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Graeme
post Apr 5 2009, 11:16 AM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 64
Joined: 18-February 09
From: UK
Member No.: 4,130



[quote name='dMole' date='Apr 5 2009, 04:25 AM' post='10769465']
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I) '& 2'

=-=-=-=-=-

Who is the NIST geezer replying? It isn't Dr. Shyam Sunder, by any chance?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
panthercat
post Sep 9 2009, 12:04 AM
Post #3





Group: Core Member
Posts: 50
Joined: 14-April 07
From: Pahoa, HI
Member No.: 952



Yes he is and he is blowing enough smoke to make a destroyer's smoke screen seem like a cigarette. You should see all 3 videos http://www.ae911truth.org/info/77 (scroll down, they’re on the left) in the sequence. The analysis of NIST’s analysis is NIST “dry labbed” the tests (made the model fit their presumptions), which presumed the collapse started earlier than it did to fit everything into their model, which had no variable for controlled demolition, something they appear loathe to admit. Albeit they did admit to free fall, it was fudged into their original model, not changing anything but admitting to free fall at one stage of the collapse.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stangit
post Jun 6 2011, 11:09 PM
Post #4





Group: Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: 3-June 11
Member No.: 5,961



QUOTE (panthercat @ Sep 8 2009, 10:04 PM) *
Yes he is and he is blowing enough smoke to make a destroyer's smoke screen seem like a cigarette. You should see all 3 videos http://www.ae911truth.org/info/77 (scroll down, they’re on the left) in the sequence. The analysis of NIST’s analysis is NIST “dry labbed” the tests (made the model fit their presumptions), which presumed the collapse started earlier than it did to fit everything into their model, which had no variable for controlled demolition, something they appear loathe to admit. Albeit they did admit to free fall, it was fudged into their original model, not changing anything but admitting to free fall at one stage of the collapse.

I have actually had people say that the building experienced an internal collapse, and that it is no big deal that the outer facade had 2.25 secs. of free fall. They also go on to mention that because the "penthouse" collapsed into the building first, that somehow that disqualifies saying WTC 7 fell in a symmetrical fashion.

I've watched the videos, and Chandlers informative refutation of the NIST report. I have watched the buildings corners as it fell and it looks pretty symmetrical to me.
When I mention to them that an internal collapse would most likely show some tell tale deformity, they point to the penthouse as proof!??
It seems like some are trying to make me think I actually did not see what I saw..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd July 2019 - 01:07 AM