IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Banning No-planers?, Merged with No Planes at WTC- Proven? Beyond All Doubt

acebaker
post Nov 12 2008, 01:56 AM
Post #1





Group: Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: 12-November 08
Member No.: 3,988



Hello. My name is Ace Baker. I have authored a work entitled "The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites". I bring 22 data points to test two competing hypotheses:


The real airplane hypothesis A real Boeing 767 airplane flew into WTC2 on 9/11.

The video composite hypothesis The jet crash was faked by inserting airplane images into otherwise authentic video footage.


I'd like to begin eliciting review from the members in this fine forum. Does Pilots allow video compositing to be discussed, or is it moved/deleted/authors banned, as in many other forums?

Thank you.

-Ace Baker
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Nov 12 2008, 02:16 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Hello Ace... welcome to the forum. Is this also you?

If not, we do not ban civil discussion of any type. Please review forum rules and post in the proper sections of the forum for the type(s) of topics you would like to discuss. A quick search will reveal VF and NPT has been discussed ad nauseum in this forum section. Please review the rules of that section pinned topics as well.


Regards,
Rob
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
acebaker
post Nov 12 2008, 05:26 AM
Post #3





Group: Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: 12-November 08
Member No.: 3,988



Hey Rob,

I'm sorry, yes, I had forgotten I registered and made that post. That is me.

I glanced at the thread topics under "Alternative Theories". I see threads on:

Age of Humans
Elite family Insider
Crop Circles
Chemtrails
Porn
Lockheed Martin and ANti Gravity
Matrix
Uber Soldiers
Georgia Guide Stones
Rat CLoning
Portal to the Sun
INvestigating Banks
Theory synthesis
Numerology

I thought this was a fourm about 9/11?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
acebaker
post Nov 12 2008, 05:30 AM
Post #4





Group: Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: 12-November 08
Member No.: 3,988



Here's a section on "UA175".

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showforum=8

Seems I should begin posting my evidence there. Will evidence of video compositing be allowed to remain in the UA175 section?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Nov 12 2008, 06:11 AM
Post #5


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



Welcome to the forum. Go to page 6 - 11 of the Alternative Theories forum to see the discussions of NPT/VF. They took place last year. We do allow discussion, unlike some forums, but NPT is still confined to that forum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Nov 12 2008, 06:23 AM
Post #6


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



QUOTE (acebaker @ Nov 12 2008, 01:26 AM) *
I thought this was a fourm about 9/11?

The scope of the Research Forums is broader than just 9/11. We also have a politics forum and one for discussion of religion. Most message boards have forums that do not directly relate to the common interest of it's members. For instance, a board for fans of a band likely has a politics forum.

In general, 'Pilots' is a research forum rather than a debate forum. Not that we always agree with one another, but facts, science and logic are the main focus. Debates also have their own forum here, but it's always good to be polite.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Nov 12 2008, 01:03 PM
Post #7



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....Video+Fakery%5C

Man i love the search feature on this forum... wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aldo Marquis CIT
post Nov 12 2008, 02:46 PM
Post #8


Citizen Investigator


Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,179
Joined: 16-August 06
Member No.: 10



I for one, do not think it should be allowed. It is pure disinfo and makes my job harder with its existence.

Ace, how come you haven't contacted any eyewitnesses from NYC who were around the South Tower?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
acebaker
post Nov 14 2008, 12:59 AM
Post #9





Group: Banned
Posts: 101
Joined: 12-November 08
Member No.: 3,988



Please review this thread. If any flying object hit WTC2, then my scientific conclusions must be proven false. I will appreciate your confining the discussion to such an attempt. Good luck.

Sincerely,

Ace Baker

This post has been edited by acebaker: Nov 14 2008, 01:02 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Nov 14 2008, 04:38 AM
Post #10


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



Moved to Debate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th February 2020 - 02:42 PM