Sun Watch Options

[GroundPounder]

i'm not dying w/ you....i'm immortal ...or or ...the aliens are taking me away ...or or... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[lunk]

We, and everything that is, around in nature,
has survived this in the past.
Or at least their/our ancestors have.

When i was young, i wondered why the north pole was water,
and the south pole was land...

If this polar reversal happens, and the crust moves again, as predicted,
North America (land) could become the next, -poles rotate-,
South rotational pole. (The North pole will, once again, be over water.)

...a bamboo framed, geodesic ball, covered in nylon netting,
and thick plastic, and an outer layer of reflective thermal blankets, double hulled, and water-tight...

[lunk]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frAEmhqdLFs

(edit, added explanation)
A coronal mass ejection, from the sun, hitting the side of the Earth, while the magnetic field was weak, could roast everything on that side of the globe, fires everywhere.

...but don't worry, the tidal waves will put them all out.

This post has been edited by lunk: Nov 18 2009, 02:43 PM

[Omega892R09]

When i was young, i wondered why the north pole was water,
and the south pole was land...

If this polar reversal happens, and the crust moves again, as predicted,
North America (land) could become the next, -poles rotate-,
South rotational pole. (The North pole will, once again, be over water.)

I would think that the Earth's continental area movements over the eons has more to do with changes in the Earh's rotational axis, and orbit of the components of the solar system, than of its magnetic axis and orientation thereof. The magnetic axis changes being a function of shifts in the directions of fluid movements within the earth brought on by such adjustments.

It is also probably true that the Earth's magnetic polarity has been affected by the Earth's rotational axis and not vice versa.
Further, the magnetic polarity may flip again because of the chaotic currents still in effect in the Earth's fluid sections, which are also affected by similar solar system induced tidal forces which exert themselves on the seas, and also the land masses. You probably don't notice the rise in the earth under your feet, a rise of as much as 10- 12 inches where the forces are greatest, as the Earth rotates under the Moon. Or rather as the Earth - Moon system rotates around the combined barycentre which is within the terrestrial globe.

[lunk]

It's the spin of the Earth that keeps the rotational poles in place.
If for some reason, the Earth were to stop spinning, it could then
change its' pole position, because the centrifugal stabilization,
would no longer be a factor.
The heaviest part of our globe will gravitate toward the moon,
and the, then pole-less Earth, will begin to rotate the other direction,
pulled along by the reversal in direction, of its' core.

The core doesn't stop spinning, it just flips upside down,
due to the upcoming magnetic, or electrical forces,
soon to be unleashed, once again, by the sun.

The science of sunspot prediction is fairly good,
short cycles have been recognized,
however there are larger cycles of sunspots,
with THE BIG ONE every 11500-11800 years.

(IMG:http://www.sidc.be/images/wolfjmms.png)
The red lines are the predicted sunspot count for the next year.
They are both overestimates, imo.

History and myth is full of stories of people, hiding out in caves,
or building boats and loading them with supplies in preparation for
a cataclysm.
It just so happens, that this is a rare, but regular cataclysm.

[lunk]

The Earth is slowing down,
second by second.

June 28, 1993

For the 18th time since 1972, scientists will fiddle with Father Time by adding another second to atomic clocks to keep in step with the Earth's rotation.

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archiv...ackval=GooglePM

December 29, 1995

At 5 p.m. New Year's Eve, a second will be added to the atomic clock here to slow it into synch with Earth's rotation.

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archiv...ackval=GooglePM

Dec. 31, 2008

a leap second will be added to atomic clocks around the world to realign Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the international standard for atomic clocks, with Earth's rotational period.

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,...1869250,00.html

[Omega892R09]

The Earth is slowing down,
second by second.

Yep! I think I mentioned that back awhile back in that Expanding (Hah!) Earth thread.

And the moon is lowly drifting away.

If the moon were to fly off beyond the solar system then we would be in big trouble.

[Omega892R09]

It just so happens, that this is a rare, but regular cataclysm.

And there are some not so regular that are long overdue like the next big one along the Andreas (or nearby faults) or in Yellowstone. Oh! And Mount Ranier is long overdue a lahar caused by just lumps of rock falling off the mountain. Watch out Tacoma and Puget, Galloping Girty had nothing on these. I wonder if BG has relocated yet. Oh! Of course he has to a rocky island off Norway maybe which will be just perfect as the ice melts.

[Sanders]

Yep! I think I mentioned that back awhile back in that Expanding (Hah!) Earth thread.

And the moon is lowly drifting away.

If the moon were to fly off beyond the solar system then we would be in big trouble.

Yes, but at the rate we are going, I don't think there will be much worth saving by the time the moon decides to spin off into space. Look how much damage these bankers and ruling elite have managed to do in a few hundred years - give 'em a billion?

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)


(All half-joking.)

[lunk]

If all those reports on the time clock adjustments are true, we have added about 20 seconds, to the year, i think, since 1972.

Now what do they mean by rotation? The daily rotation of the Earth; or it's yearly rotation around the sun; or the the number of revolutions of the Earth in a year?

It's interesting the comparison between an atom and the solar system.
...electrons can have one of two directions of spin.

[Omega892R09]

It's interesting the comparison between an atom and the solar system.
...electrons can have one of two directions of spin.

Ah! But!

The Niels Bohr model of the atom, whereby an electron can be thought of as a little sattelite orbiting the planet of a nucleus has been superceded (when will Open Office acknowledge the UK English spelling of that?) by the thinking of Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger whereby an electron can 'appear' to be smeared out across its orbit.

Then there is the positron.

[Omega892R09]

...however there are larger cycles of sunspots,
with THE BIG ONE every 11500-11800 years.

And there are others measured in decades or centuries too.
Here is another cycle prediction chart:

(IMG:http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/images/noaaprediction/prediction_strip2.jpg)

the supporting article:

New Solar Cycle Prediction

this bit is interesting,

"Even a below-average cycle is capable of producing severe space weather," points out Biesecker. "The great geomagnetic storm of 1859, for instance, occurred during a solar cycle of about the same size we’re predicting for 2013."

The 1859 storm--known as the "Carrington Event" after astronomer Richard Carrington who witnessed the instigating solar flare--electrified transmission cables, set fires in telegraph offices, and produced Northern Lights so bright that people could read newspapers by their red and green glow. A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences found that if a similar storm occurred today, it could cause $1 to 2 trillion in damages to society's high-tech infrastructure and require four to ten years for complete recovery. For comparison, Hurricane Katrina caused "only" $80 to 125 billion in damage.

[Sanders]

It's debilitating to think of a quantum particle as an "object". Frequency and wave mechanics rule that world ... electrons stick to their orbits because of wave mechanics - they only exist where the probability waves of their existence coincide in the "positive". ...Which tells you that they are not little balls ... what exactly they are, I don't know, no one knows. (And yes, I am fully aware of string theory.)

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

[lunk]

And there are others measured in decades or centuries too.
Here is another cycle prediction chart:

(IMG:http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/images/noaaprediction/prediction_strip2.jpg)

the supporting article:

New Solar Cycle Prediction

this bit is interesting,

Patrick Geryl has his own theory about sunspot cycles:

The Maya calculated with this theory a super sunspot cycle for 2012

http://www.howtosurvive2012.com/htm_night/sun_05.htm

it seems to describe the variations in sunspot peaks and numbers.

[lunk]

As we approach the predicted sunspot maximum,
according to the current sunspot forecasts, that have been fairly accurate in the past, we should be seeing at least 5 to 15 sunspot,
each lasting about 25 days on average,
by now.
It isn't happening.
(IMG:http://www.sidc.be/images/wolfjmms.png)

According to Clif High at halfpasthuman.com
the sun will get so entwined in its' invisible magnetic fields,
that we shouldn't see any sunspots at all.

However we may see a lot of violent activity,
like huge solar flairs, and no more than, 1 to 3 short lived,
(lasting only days, later just hours) very violent sunspots, at a time.

(IMG:http://spaceweather.com/images2009/25nov09/midi163.gif)
Sunspot number: 0

http://spaceweather.com/

...thinking boat

[lunk]

INCOMING COMET!

(IMG:http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c3small.gif)

at 8 o'clock

[Ricochet]

INCOMING COMET!

(IMG:http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c3small.gif)

at 8 o'clock

8:30 Newfoundland
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

[lunk]

There seems to be other things traveling around the sun too.
(and they aren't on the planetary plane either)

if you watch the pictures at a slower frame rate there is a something else moving above the sun at 10 o'clock, (not on the planetary plane)
(i know 10:30 in NFLD) lol

http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c3.mpg

(edit) prepositions

This post has been edited by lunk: Jan 2 2010, 09:48 PM

[lunk]

Ongoing thread, going on,
on the topic, of this thread.

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message956338/pg1

17 pages, and counting, (sorry)

If there is anything in the sky to watch for,
this IS, an unexpected, extraordinary, phenomena!

(IMG:http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c3.gif)

(if this is too slow of a load, feel free to delete this post)
cheers, lunk

(edit) added
The cosmic rays, that you may think you see "flying around"
in the sequences of pictures, are really mostly just plain, ordinary, ufo's.
(...though, some may say otherwise)

This post has been edited by lunk: Jan 3 2010, 12:44 AM

[lunk]

It looks like the comet has disintegrated.

bright comet discovered by NASA's STEREO-A spacecraft is swinging by the sun today and apparently disintegrating.
(snip)
The comet was found on Jan. 2nd by Australian amateur astronomer Alan Watson, who was inspecting images obtained by STEREO-A's Heliospheric Imager on Dec. 30, 2009.

http://spaceweather.com/


Hmmm, that was the same day, i posted about it here,
...funny how time works in space, and place.

i nearly discovered it first,
...it could have been called, "lunks' comet". LOL


(edit) forgot to link

This post has been edited by lunk: Jan 3 2010, 03:31 PM