Important Conference With Cit And P4t, July 11 at 10:00am in Arlington, VA Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Thanks to Enver Masud with The Wisdom Fund at twf.org for organizing this and making it happen.

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2009/0611-Pentagon.pdf

The presentation will reveal groundbreaking, independent, verifiable evidence with serious geopolitical and historical implications. It will feature a detailed deconstruction of the Flight Data Recorder information — allegedly from the black box of Flight 77 — released by the National Transportation Safety Board in 2006. A simulation of the official flight path based on this data, with carefully constructed topography and obstacles, will be compared to physical aircraft limitations by a certified pilot. The data and the physical damage will also be compared with first-hand video-recorded, witness accounts from Pentagon police, Arlington Cemetery employees, and Arlington citizens. This timely presentation, with
rare photos and videos, challenges and undermines the official account of what happened on that tragic September 11, 2001.

Presenters:

Shelton F. Lankford: Lt. Col. USMC (ret.), fighter pilot with 300+ combat missions and 10,000+ hours flight time. Awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, and 32 Air Medals.

Aldo Marquis: Co-founder, Citizen Investigation Team, independent researcher, concerned citizen and father.

Enver Masud: Engineer, Director, Operations Review Division (State of Iowa), Acting Chief, Strategic and Emergency Planning (U.S. Dept. of Energy), consultant to USAID and World Bank.

Craig Ranke: Co-founder, Citizen Investigation Team, independent researcher, concerned citizen and
activist.

It's free.

Make a trip out of it.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: May 29 2009, 09:50 PM

[Craig Ranke CIT]

(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/CIT/TWFconference.jpg)

[albertchampion]

WELL, i shall sure try to arrange my schedule to be there. even though i really hate DC in the summer.

[Craig Ranke CIT]

WELL, i shall sure try to arrange my schedule to be there. even though i really hate DC in the summer.

No way it's awesome!

I'm a Michigan raised California transplant so I miss the humidity.

Hope to see you there!

[rob balsamo]

Im going to do my best to be there as well...

I just included this topic in our Newsletter to forum members.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Awesome!

Thanks and we sure hope you can make it after all!

[onesliceshort]

Fantastic. I´ll pass this important info on.

This post has been edited by onesliceshort: Jun 2 2009, 04:31 PM

[Bruce Sinclair]

I am delighted to see that Shelton has agreed to represent us at this important event. Thank-you Shelton!

Regards,

Bruce

[rob balsamo]

I am delighted to see that Shelton has agreed to represent us at this important event.

I am too.... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:http://patriotsquestion911.com/Photos/Shelton%20LankfordG%20220%20JPG80.jpg)

Now thats a Marine Aviator and Officer concerned about his country and oath. Stepping up to the plate, putting his face and name on the line... A Professional Aviator who doesnt make excuse for his govt, but questions/monitors it as our Founding Fathers so cautioned.......

I must say, im damn proud of our organization and its members. Thank you for speaking out!

Shelton, this is for you.. as you just scream "American Bad Ass" in any photo you take... or any article you write...



Salute!

[Aidan Monaghan]

Glad to see CIT is still pressing the Pentagon matter.

I don't know what happened at the Penatgon on 9/11 but because of all the CIT research, it seems virtually certain that AA 77 did not fly south of the Citgo station and topple the light posts as alleged by "official" accounts.

All of the Pentagon scene interviews are a very important historical record.

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Thanks Aidan!

Please check out our new website and brand new presentation that is the definitive piece for our work in context of the anomalous physical damage, the official story, and all of the evidence for a north side approach flyover including the details about Lloyde the cab driver:

http://www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com

View presentation here:

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Jun 7 2009, 12:33 PM

[Aidan Monaghan]

Thanks Aidan!

Please check out our new website and brand new presentation that is the definitive piece for our work in context of the anomalous physical damage, the official story, and all of the evidence for a north side approach flyover including the details about Lloyde the cab driver:

http://www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com

View presentation here:

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT

Watched the film. A good production.

Didn't know Lloyd's wife worked for the FBI. And AA 77s reduced appraoch speed is very interesting.

Perhaps the extreme speeds apparently falsely attributed to AA 77 were to create a perception that so little wreckage of AA 77 could be discovered because it could not have survived an alleged 400-500 mph impact.

I can't recall for certain, but did the Pentagon officer who described a low-flying plane after the alleged AA 77 explosion via phone also describe a similar scene during his official interview?

By the way, I have a lawsuit underway with the FBI seeking all Pentagon records, plus more. Within a few weeks I should be able to force the FBI to at least declare what records they do have and why they are holding them.

I must confess, the collective acounts and building damage do imply at the very least that the light posts and C-Ring hole were likely staged in anticipation of a south-of-Citgo approach.

And one obvious reason for staging crash evidence would be to create the appearance of a crash that wasn't supposed to take place.

This post has been edited by Aidan Monaghan: Jun 9 2009, 07:37 AM

[maturin42]

Thanks for the kind words. I hope I can live up to them. I am proud to be on the same bill as the CIT guys (and will finally get to meet them). I hope I can translate some of the anger and frustration felt by many of us in the 9/11 Truth community at the utter worthlessness of members of our "free and independent press" and the bovine acceptance of propaganda by our fellow citizens, into words that will inspire action and a willingness to speak out.

I know that when I take the stage I will be standing on the shoulders of some very dedicated professionals and patriots.
SFL

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Watched the film. A good production.

Thanks again Aidan. I'll reply to your questions in the other thread.

[p.w.rapp]

I hope I can translate some of the anger and frustration felt by many of us in the 9/11 Truth community at the utter worthlessness of members of our "free and independent press" and the bovine acceptance of propaganda by our fellow citizens, into words that will inspire action and a willingness to speak out.

...how I love this kind of precise wording! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/handsdown.gif)

In German we call it "die feine Klinge" an expression, that to my knowledge hasn't yet been translated satisfactorily into English.

Good luck for the conference to you and the CIT-team.

[Teardrop]

A very good, clear and concise video presentation, great 3d graphics. Well done Cit.
Is there any chance you could get any of the witnesses who had the guts to speak up
on camera to be present at the meeting ?
As they have said they would be willing to testify to their statements, it would be a really
benificial meeting between them and Cit and P4t members and should bolster their
knowledge of the depth of support they have.

Should also be interesting to see how news of this meeting may have spread thru the Pentagon
and if there may be any other staff willing to attend and maybe tell their stories.

Hope this snowballs forward for you guys. You got my respect.

[datars]

I watch the video last night, Nice! Work! Craig Ranke.

You put it all together; my hat is off to you (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

I was thinking of putting it up on Torrent too give your site more exposure

[Aidan Monaghan]

Any reference to "AA 77" should be taken as loose. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

If I understand correctly, in a fly-over scenario "AA 77" may have veered right once over the Pentagon? If so, its proximity and angular orientation to runways at Reagan International, combined with what seems to be aircraft speed comparable to those pre-touchdown during a landing approach, may have been intended to provide a casual observer with a perception of an "AA 77" fly-over with an aborted touchdown and ascent of a normal flight into Reagan International (consistent with normal traffic patterns at Reagan International).

Hard to determine, but I find the apparently much lower approach speeds for "AA 77" to be equally as remarkable as the apparent north-of-Citgo trajectory.

If I understand correctly, the C-130's proximity to "AA 77" was exagerated in order to be substituted in media accounts for a departing "AA 77" post-fly-over?

I must confess that the evidence does strongly imply fly-over.

- downed light posts, destroyed trailer and C-Ring hole that could not have been created by an apparent north-side approach.

- the apparent staging of the above evidence would only occur if there was an interest in creating a perception of a "AA 77"/Pentaon impact.

- the staging of the above evidence would only occur in the event that "AA 77" was never intended to strike the Pentagon.

This post has been edited by Aidan Monaghan: Jun 13 2009, 11:08 AM

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Any reference to "AA 77" should be taken as loose. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

If I understand correctly, in a fly-over scenario "AA 77" may have veered right once over the Pentagon? If so, its proximity and angular orientation to runways at Reagan International, combined with what seems to be aircraft speed comparable to those pre-touchdown during a landing approach, may have been intended to provide a casual observer with a perception of an "AA 77" fly-over with an aborted touchdown and ascent of a normal flight into Reagan International (consistent with normal traffic patterns at Reagan International).

There is no evidence it landed at Reagan and Roosevelt Roberts Jr is the ultimate evidence that this is clearly NOT what happened.

Hard to determine, but I find the apparently much lower approach speeds for "AA 77" to be equally as remarkable as the apparent north-of-Citgo trajectory.

Yes this is what facilitated the rather extreme bank described.

Naturally even this would appear "fast" to some witnesses, particularly those who did not see it approach, and only saw as it passed them, like the citgo witnesses.

If I understand correctly, the C-130's proximity to "AA 77" was exagerated in order to be substituted in media accounts for a departing "AA 77" post-fly-over?

Precisely. But this was taken even further with proven fabricated witness accounts and embellishments from people like Keith Wheelhouse and Joel Sucherman. Watch our exclusive on camera interviews with them in How They Pulled It Off.

I must confess that the evidence does strongly imply fly-over.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/welcome.gif)

- downed light posts, destroyed trailer and C-Ring hole that could not have been created by an apparent north-side approach.

- the apparent staging of the above evidence would only occur if there was an interest in creating a perception of a "AA 77"/Pentaon impact.

- the staging of the above evidence would only occur in the event that "AA 77" was never intended to strike the Pentagon.

All very true.

We've updated the article about the impossibility of a north side impact on our FAQ page here.

[Aidan Monaghan]

There is no evidence it landed at Reagan and Roosevelt Roberts Jr is the ultimate evidence that this is clearly NOT what happened.

Sorry, I meant to suggest that a relatively slow moving, ascending and banking "AA 77" may have been intended in order to blend with normal air traffic happenings within the area of Reagan National.

Hopefully your presentation can find its way into the hands of people who could become whistle-blowers. (people involved with Pentagon evidence collection or lack thereof)