Ron Wieck Gets Catty (or Caney?), Caution- Graphic, Adult Website discussed Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

We KNOW that you frauds are VERY, VERY unhappy that ALL your witnesses SAW THE PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON.

Most couldn't see the alleged impact point or the Pentagon at all liar.

But ALL of them saw it pass right by them on the north side just like Lagasse.

I guarantee that none of them (including Lagasse) will back off this.

So when are we doing the show?

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

WrongWeak,

It is so clear that you are seething. You can't even form a sentence without including the word frauds. What makes you so aggressive?

You should seek some help with your emotional problems.

Because I see no frauds here. Just a hack who lies, evades, ignores, moves goal posts, and lies some more so he doesn't have to admit he was wrong.



Main Entry: hack
Function: adjective
Date: circa 1734
1 : working for hire especially with mediocre professional standards <a hack journalist>
2 : performed by, suited to, or characteristic of a hack <hack writing>
3 : hackneyed , trite

This post has been edited by Aldo Marquis CIT: Apr 1 2009, 03:38 PM

[Craig Ranke CIT]

So do you guys shoot your projects at the same time to cut costs?

I swear it looks like you're getting caned here:

(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/miscellanious/ronweak.jpg)

[rob balsamo]

Ron sent me a few emails playing dumb with respect to "Tony Holt".

From: Ronald Wieck <pomeroo@verizon.net>
Subject: RE: Pseudo-Skeptic Program Hardfire Shares PO Box with Hardcore S&M Producers
To: pilotsfortruth@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 4:51 PM

Gee, that’s the best work your outfit has ever done. Now, what possible significance does this character have for me? Neither Gary nor I have ever heard of him. If you were someone other than the person you are, I would wonder what possible point you imagine you’re making.

Here is my reply...

Pseudo-Skeptic Program Hardfire Shares PO Box with Hardcore S&M Producers
Wednesday, April 1, 2009 4:56 PM
From: "Pilots For Truth" <pilotsfortruth@yahoo.com>
To: "Ronald Wieck" <pomeroo@verizon.net>


So.. Gary doesnt see checks in his PO Box for S&M Porn? Cause according to Tony Holt, he shares the same PO Box as Hardfire and is acceptng checks to purchase his porn through the same PO Box Hardfire gets check for their Hardfire DVD's.

As for our work, since its clear you dont understand our work, im not surprised you think our best work was uncovering dirt on Hardfire with respect to porn. Perhaps its more along your understanding.

Again Ron.. anytime you have a real expert who wants to discuss real data... let us know. We'll spank them as hard and furious as the DVD's sold through the Hardfire PO Box in Brooklyn.

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Ron sent me a few emails playing dumb with respect to "Tony Holt".

Here is my reply...

We'll spank them as hard and furious as the DVD's sold through the Hardfire PO Box in Brooklyn.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)


Be careful, he's going to think you're coming on to him!

[RonWieck]

Oooh I am shaking in my kicks, PentagonRon. So do the quotation marks mean you are now saying Lagasse and others aren't witnesses at all?

Ron, nothing you could do or say can change the fact that plane approached on the north side of the Citgo and the implications this brings. Not even your alleged dialog with Lagasse and any hard feelings he may now have towards us.

The cat is already out of the bag and you can't put it back in.

LaGasse regards you simpleminded frauds as liars and morons. He SAW the plane hit the Pentagon. Your inept attempts to pretend that you have "established" a flight path for the plane other than the one it actually followed has made you laughingstocks even in the fantasy movement.

There is nothing "alleged" about my dealings with Lt. LaGasse, fraud.

[RonWieck]

Ron sent me a few emails playing dumb with respect to "Tony Holt".




Here is my reply...

Yeah, I'm playing dumb, but you're the real thing.

[RonWieck]

WrongWeak,

It is so clear that you are seething. You can't even form a sentence without including the word frauds. What makes you so aggressive?

You should seek some help with your emotional problems.

Because I see no frauds here. Just a hack who lies, evades, ignores, moves goal posts, and lies some more so he doesn't have to admit he was wrong.



Main Entry: hack
Function: adjective
Date: circa 1734
1 : working for hire especially with mediocre professional standards <a hack journalist>
2 : performed by, suited to, or characteristic of a hack <hack writing>
3 : hackneyed , trite

I see the line about "working for hire." Hmmm, you've been caught lying again, fraud. I'm aggressive in pinning down cowardly purveyors of vicious falsehoods.

The CIT-heads have produced absolutely NOTHING. Your gutless refusal to take your mindless, deceptive trash to a real news outlet tells us everything we need to know.

[RonWieck]

Most couldn't see the alleged impact point or the Pentagon at all liar.

But ALL of them saw it pass right by them on the north side just like Lagasse.

I guarantee that none of them (including Lagasse) will back off this.

So when are we doing the show?

YOU are not doing any show until you crawl out from under your bed and take your trash to a real news outlet.

I will keep you posted on the dates of my exposes.

[rob balsamo]

Yeah, I'm playing dumb, but you're the real thing.

Always good when we are able to come to an agreement Ron.. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

Well your dealings are "alleged" until you prove otherwise

Edit by rb: Sorry Aldo, i deleted your post here by mistake when hitting the edit button instead of the reply button.

The below written by rb:

Ron also alleged that the NTSB has commented on their data not supporting an impact. Ron made this claim sometime last year when he also alleged P4T refuses to debate. Ron still has yet to provde proof of either claim.

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

Your gutless refusal to take your mindless, deceptive trash to a real news outlet tells us everything we need to know.

RonWieck, accomplice to the cover-up of mass murder, can you source that refusal? Then can you show us the proof that we haven't?

[Craig Ranke CIT]

LaGasse regards you simpleminded frauds as liars and morons. He SAW the plane hit the Pentagon. Your inept attempts to pretend that you have "established" a flight path for the plane other than the one it actually followed has made you laughingstocks even in the fantasy movement.

There is nothing "alleged" about my dealings with Lt. LaGasse, fraud.

Haha.

Lagasse will NEVER back off the north side flight path.

We know he is in denial about the implications and afraid to talk about it anymore.

That is no secret.

Lagasse SAW the plane on the north side like everyone else.

He already admitted that he "flinched" and jumped in his car out of "fear" and that he could not tell exactly what the plane did when it reached the building due to the fireball.

You would know this if you had bothered to watch his interview.

Whether or not you were able to bait him into attacking us personally has ZERO relevance to the fact that he was willing to wager his life on the north side approach and that this was unanimously corroborated by EVERYONE else in the area.

What about Brooks?

Turcios?

How about Middleton, Aman, Carter, Prather, Stafford, and everyone else who corroborates the north side appraoch?

You haven't watched ANY of their interviews because YOU are clearly the fraud.

A fraud who works with S&M slinging perverts no less.

[JFK]

This topic does not surprise me in the least. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/nonono.gif)

[Craig Ranke CIT]

LaGasse regards you simpleminded frauds as liars and morons. He SAW the plane hit the Pentagon.

There is nothing "alleged" about my dealings with Lt. LaGasse, fraud.

Haha.

Lagasse will NEVER back off the north side flight path.

We already know he is in denial about the implications and afraid to talk about it anymore.

That is no secret.

Lagasse SAW the plane on the north side like everyone else.

He already admitted that he "flinched" and jumped in his car out of "fear" and that he could not tell exactly what the plane did when it reached the building due to the fireball.

You would know this if you had bothered to watch his interview.

Whether or not you were able to bait him into attacking us personally has ZERO relevance to the fact that he was willing to wager his life on the north side approach and that this was unanimously corroborated by EVERYONE else in the area.

What about Brooks?

Turcios?

How about Middleton, Aman, Carter, Prather, Stafford, and everyone else who corroborates the north side appraoch?

You haven't watched ANY of their interviews because YOU are clearly the fraud.

A fraud who works with S&M slinging perverts no less.

[Craig Ranke CIT]

YOU are not doing any show until you crawl out from under your bed and take your trash to a real news outlet.

I will keep you posted on the dates of my exposes.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

Figures you coward.

At least you admitted there is nothing "real" about your show.

So you will resort to attacking us personally un-opposed while ignoring the evidence (that you haven't bothered to view) because you KNOW you will look like a complete idiot if you have to address it direct.

Of course there is nothing that could wipe that freshly caned look off your face making you look like an idiot either way.

Looking forward to it!

[RonWieck]

Most couldn't see the alleged impact point or the Pentagon at all liar.

But ALL of them saw it pass right by them on the north side just like Lagasse.

I guarantee that none of them (including Lagasse) will back off this.

So when are we doing the show?

You've been caught lying, tiny dunce. Most witnesses support the actual flight path. Your cherry-picked handful got it wrong. You are well aware of why you scurry off, tail between your legs, every time I slam you across the face with THE question about the Titanic survivors. Although you are incredibly stupid, you do get the idea that witnesses to a traumatic event remember the big picture, i.e., they all saw the plane hit the Pentagon, but details grow fuzzy over the years.

[RonWieck]

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

Figures you coward.

At least you admitted there is nothing "real" about your show.

So you will resort to attacking us personally un-opposed while ignoring the evidence (that you haven't bothered to view) because you KNOW you will look like a complete idiot if you have to address it direct.

Of course there is nothing that could wipe that freshly caned look off your face making you look like an idiot either way.

Looking forward to it!

Uh, itty-bitty jackass, you got it bass-ackwards as usual. THE EVIDENCE IS GOING TO ADDRESS YOU.

This post has been edited by RonWieck: Apr 1 2009, 05:48 PM

[RonWieck]

RonWieck, accomplice to the cover-up of mass murder, can you source that refusal? Then can you show us the proof that we haven't?

Right. I am impressed by your Pulitzer Prize. Here I though you were just America-hating, terrorist-loving, dishonest, ineducable morons. But your success in breaking the biggest story in the history of journalism made me eat my words.

Pathetic lying imbecile.

[rob balsamo]

Edit by rb: Sorry Aldo, i deleted your post here by mistake when hitting the edit button instead of the reply button.

The below written by rb:

Ron also alleged that the NTSB has commented on their data not supporting an impact. Ron made this claim sometime last year when he also alleged P4T refuses to debate. Ron still has yet to provde proof of either claim.

Sorry Aldo, the above quote/post was a reply/edit button brain fart.