IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
War Games Targeting Wtc Created In '76, Army officer Tim McNiven helped plan exercises, merged

George Hayduke
post Jan 24 2007, 12:37 PM
Post #1


Got aliens?


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,052
Joined: 21-October 06
Member No.: 120



According to Jim Marrs in his most recent book "The Terror Conspiracy" a military officer based in Germany in 1976 was approached to invent exercises that would be realistic and that would dovetail with a fictional scenario wherein the WTC is destroyed.

That officer's name is McNiven, I think. I don't have the book on hand at the moment.

Anyway, he and some other soldiers created a scenario, and this is in 1976 mind you, 3 years after the CIA invented Al Queda, wherein Boeing jumbo jets are hijacked by suicidal Arabs who fly them into the WTC, destroying it. They turned this, what shall we call it, vision, over to their superiors. And then became nervous.

Acting on his conscience he threatened some powerful military folks, saying that he would go public if the scenario ever happened. He was beaten for it, according to Marrs.

Later the same people who beat him turned around and said if that scenario ever happens that he must go public. This position was later reasserted, and he was told that if he was ever ordered to remain silent about it all he must go public because the people that want him to remain silent are the same ones that would make his invented, fictional scenario become operational.

This post has been edited by George Hayduke: Jan 24 2007, 12:39 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Jan 24 2007, 12:38 PM
Post #2


..with liberty and justice for all.


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,152
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Orlando, FL
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (George Hayduke @ Jan 24 2007, 11:37 AM)
According to Jim Marrs in his most recent book "The Terror Conspiracy" a military officer based in Germany in 1976 was approached to invent exercises that would be realistic and that would dovetail with a fictional scenario wherein the WTC is destroyed.

That officer's name is McNiven, I think. I don't have the book on hand at the moment.

Anyway, he and some other soldiers created a scenario, and this is in 1976 mind you, 3 years after the CIA invented Al Queda, wherein Boeing jumbo jets are hijacked by suicidal Arabs who fly them into the WTC, destroying it.

After he submitted it he threatened some folks, saying that he would go public if the scenario ever happened. He was beaten for it, according to Marrs.

Later the same people who beat him turned around and said if that scenario ever happens that he must go public. This position was later reasserted, and he was told that if he was ever ordered to remain silent about it all he must go public because the people that want him to remain silent are the same ones that would make his invented, fictional scenario become operational.

ohmy.gif


Hmm...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarya
post Jan 24 2007, 04:31 PM
Post #3


Library Team


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 170
Joined: 16-October 06
From: Middle Earth
Member No.: 82



QUOTE
27 June 2002

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Timothy S. McNiven,
114 Grand Avenue, No. 202,
BELLINGHAM, WA
98225 1465

Dear Sir:

You attended my office on 27 June 02 and were identified as Timothy Stuart McNiven, Date of Birth 1 Nov 53, Social Security Number 537-56-87[41]. The purpose of the visit was for you to take a polygraph examination in order to support the fact that you were a member of a group assembled as part of the C Battery, 2/81st Field Artillery US Army stationed on Strassburg Kaserine, Idar Oberstein, West Germany for the purpose of developing defensive strategies against attacks by hijacked aircraft. The discussions covered the possibility of aircraft being taken over by dissidents and used to attack important buildings in the United States of America.

You signed an agreement to undergo the polygraph examination. A copy of the agreement is attached.

After discussion it was agreed that the following were to be relevant questions.

1. Regarding the study that took place when you were a member of C Battery 2/81st FA in Idar Oberstein, West Germany in the 1970's. Do you intend to answer truthfully each question?

A. Yes

2. Did that study take place?

A. Yes.

3. Did you discuss aircraft hijacking?

A. Yes.

4. Did you discuss the possibility of hijacked aircraft destroying buildings?

A. Yes.

T.S. McNiven. 27 Jun 02 Page. 2.

Three charts were produced in respect to the above questions and other questions relevant to the technique. Your physiological responses recorded on the charts to Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 were those expected from someone who was not attempting to deceive the examiner. I believe you were being truthful when you answered the questions as shown.

The polygraph charts are on file at my office and available for review by any competent authority.

_____

Information Polygraph Exam Based On

Briefly 25 years ago I was stationed on Strassberg Keserne in Idar Oberstein, Rhienland Pfatz, W. Germany assigned to C Battery, 2/81st FA, US Army. Here I took part in a Military Group for the purpose of "defending against" a developed attack scenario of hijacking airliners and crashing them into buildings to get around our air defence system.

For this letter I have selected facts from the records for the purpose of confirming that the records exist, they are in no sequence or order but they will suffice for the purpose of identifing the existence of these 25 year old records. These facts are from group conversations following the creation of the concept of hijacking airliners.

When asked the question, what kind of plane would be best to hijack? My choice was Boeing because it had the one lock/one key fleet; information I acquired from living in Everett, WA and having brothers who worked there. Lt. Teague on another day asked what could be done about it (?) I suggested asking Boeing to change their lock system.

When asked what kind of weapons could be used (?) I said a plastic handled box knife to get it through a metal detector; then Sgt Middleton said that you could get weapons on a plane through the luggage area (he knew someone who worked on a ground crew at an airport) he was then questioned separate like others whose ideas the groups leaders wanted more information on.

When asked what type of political climate the country would be in when the attack happens(?) we came up with hamstringing ; that is when one political party sets up the incoming administration with a disaster to happen.

When asked who might do this (?) another member said a name which I made an agreement to allow him to say in public first; but I can say that it was not George Bush neither President Bush who was President on Nov. 9, 1989 or George Bush who is President now.

4. One of the people from the group had done calculations and had came up with a time frame for a 100 story building to collapse after being hit by an airliner, it was between 1 and 2 hours the exact minutes I can't remember. Later when he was questioned by Military higher ups about a building's engineers disputing his calculations; he said, that unlike him they had to say that to keep their job.

5. The Military's calculations were what the warnings to NYC were based on.

One person from the group said that the US Government should contact NYC and have it tell the firefighters and police officers to not try and go up 80 floors in a building to try and put out the fire because the building would collapse before they could get there.

The records also include a person from the group who considered himself a religious person being a Priest in his Religion; made an International plea begging the US Government to tell New York City to not send those people to their unnecessary death.

When asked what an International plea of begging was (?) he explained that religious people can not twist anyone's arm to do anything, all they can do is beg a government to intercede and prevent a calamity.

_____

Personal Account and Invitation

Since September 2001 I have been trying to get the information on this 25+ year old US Military Study Group into the public's knowledge but have only met with censorship from the US media...

http://cryptome.org/mil-911-study.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Jan 24 2007, 04:57 PM
Post #4


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



There are many things about this that make me question the veracity of this report, but even if it is completely accurate, Mr. McNiven apparently believes the World Trade Center "collapsed." That is not a position I take in regards to what happened at the WTC and this difference of observation is cental to why I question the veracity, and indeed, the value, of this statement.

Ok, so someone ran a contengency "thought experiment" in 1976 regarding this incident bla bla bla. So what? The military and think tanks, even the oval office, run contengency scenarios about all kinds of things all the time. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO.

How is this of any help to us?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
George Hayduke
post Jan 25 2007, 07:55 AM
Post #5


Got aliens?


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,052
Joined: 21-October 06
Member No.: 120



QUOTE (painter @ Jan 24 2007, 08:57 PM)
Ok, so someone ran a contengency "thought experiment" in 1976 regarding this incident bla bla bla. So what? The military and think tanks, even the oval office, run contengency scenarios about all kinds of things all the time. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO.

How is this of any help to us?

In 1976, when this scenario was envisioned as a military assignment, Bush was in the CIA.

Twenty-five years later that scenario becomes operational.

This bit of information is important to you Painter because you need evidence that the crime syndicate that forms the shadow government running this country has been in place and fully effectual for, literally, many decades and some of the things we are seeing now are the fruits of decades of foresight and planning. You now have one more morsel of evidence to further this view.

You also likely can use this tidbit of information to further the argument that the crimes of 9/11 extend well beyond the junta and that the removal of the junta will only be a superficial and short-term fix to a much larger, even cancerous, problem.

Also, this is nugget if information should be kept in mind when you read on total411.info that evidence mounts that explosives were built into the facade of the tower, literally mixed in with the concrete in the walls and floor, when those towers were constructed. ...

This post has been edited by George Hayduke: Jan 25 2007, 08:00 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jo56
post Jan 25 2007, 11:45 AM
Post #6





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,283
Joined: 14-December 06
Member No.: 321



Video here:

http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=8&id=11




More info here:

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/09/325502.shtml
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post May 22 2007, 07:30 PM
Post #7



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



I havent went through all of the source links yet... but i did read the letter. Interesting to say the least. For those who wish to research it.. enjoy!

QUOTE
"I Helped The U.S. Army Plan The 9/11 Attacks" (ATS Newsletter Special)

In 1976 Congress commissioned a plan to determine how terrorists could attack the World Trade Center under the guise of an "airport security" study. The theoretical (at the time) plan specified how the towers might be felled using commercial aircraft hijacked with nothing more than "box cutters." The exercise, run by the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency, made use of specialists in C-Baterry 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army stationed in Strassburg, Germany. I was one such specialist, I participated in these events was and then went on to work for Army Intelligence and the Department of Defense.

My story is one of frustration, harassment, stress, and desperation as I try to communicate my ordeal to any who will listen.


Email Newsletter Special Feature
May 22, 2007
By ATS Member, Timothy S. McNiven


C-Battery 2/81st FA, US Army 1975-76 Where are you?

In January 2005, Frank Bass wrote an article for the Chicago Sun -Times about the Nixon - Ford administration's Cabinet Committee to Combat Terrorism that the Strassburg study was an activity of. This Committee ran until Democratic Political Party President Jimmy Carter cut the Funds from his administrations' Budget for the Implementing of the Improvements that were developed from the study, thus ending US Air Travel Security improvements until after September 11,2001.

In 2003, my US Military study information was used in the Ellen Mariani RICO lawsuit that was filed against the Bush administration; it was Count III of the Lawsuit text, pages 25 to 27. In the first paragraph of my Affidavit, I identify myself as the DoD Agent.

I am with three decades in Services to the DoD.

I like to point out to people that US Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was one of the Lawsuit's Defendants, did not have me arrested, or even questioned about my committing the US Federal Felony of impersonating a US Federal Agent when I testified before US Federal Court that, in fact, I am a US Federal Agent for the US Defense Department.

When US Attorney General John Ashcroft did not arrest me for impersonating a US Federal Agent for testifying in US Federal Court that, in fact, I am a US Federal Agent; he 'publicly confirmed' that what I stated was true; that I was, in fact, the DoD agent I testified I was. When he did this, he also 'publicly confirmed' that the rest of my affidavit was also true (unless you can explain and prove why I only told the truth in the first paragraph of my affidavit and did not in the rest of it), which makes my US Defense Department US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information- the only US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information (that which has come from US Government Departments or Agencies), to be "Publicly Confirmed" to be true by the US Government.

I have issued this challenge to everyone who said my information was not true: do you have a higher US Government legal opinion than the US Attorney General's Office, under US Attorney General John Ashcroft, on whether or not I told the Truth when I Testified in US Federal Court, that in fact I am a US Federal Agent and a US Federal Law that gives you this higher US Government legal opinion? Not one Democrat has answered this question or had any further contact with me.

My US military study information has also been considered for use in the International Criminal Court case against Tony Blair for using cluster bombs on civilians. I sent my information to the International Legal Panel who wrote up the ICC charges because they were looking for a way to connect Bush to Blair (my 1976 US Military Study information establishes a "25 Year" time period in which the UK and US Governments could have made plans), so that he can be charged as a co-conspirator in the ICC, which is legal even though Democratic Political Party President Bill Clinton "refused" to allow his Democratic Political Party's world wide activities to be scrutinized by the International Criminal Court and did not allow the US Government to join.

I have also been given the written support of the Canadian Government that what I say about the US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information is true over what John Kerry and the Democrats - John McCain and the Republicans have said about US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge. Here are the links to the letters of support that I was given by: the Honourable John McCallum, Canada's Minister of National Defence and Carolyn Parrish, MP and former Vice Chair to the Internaional NATO Executive as well as being the Elected Official who 'stomped' on the George Bush Doll for the Canadian TV show This Hour has 22 Minutes.

I would like to point out that Mr. McCallum did not get into Political trouble like the 'German woman Government Official' who compared Bush to Hitler and was forced to resign... instead he was named the Canadian Government's Official Announcer for the Rolling Stones' Concert that was broadcast Live from Toronto to the US and Canadian Troops in Afghanistan and then was Promoted to Canadian Minister of Finance. Is the reason that Bush did not go after Mr.McCallum the way he went after the 'German woman Government Official' because he knew he would lose the US Government's closest Military Ally, Canada, on the issue of US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information?

My United States Defense Deartment US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge has been subjected to the most stringent test in America, that of; the US Federal Court and the US Attorney General's Office under US Attorney General John Ashcroft; it also has been given the written support of the Canadian Government through its highest military representative and is being used for an International Criminal Court Case. So, why has the Democratic Political Party censored this information from the people of the world? Is it because it shows that the Democratic Political Party is 'equally' involved in the 9-11-01 attacks and the World War for Money that resulted from them?

In the Spring of 2002, Cynthia McKinney came on US National TV and cried out for US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information. Within days of her crying out for US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information I faxed to her Georgia and Washington, DC offices the information about the 1976 US Military Study to Improve US Air Travel Security and received No reply.

In August 2002 I once again faxed the 1976 US Military Study information to her Georgia and Washingto,DC Offices with a note that I would hand-deliver a copy, if that is what it took to get a reply. Her staff sent me a one-line political party reply; McKinney has 'refused' to have any contact with me at all; the US Defense Department Agent who sent her the US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information- she came on American National TV and cried out for; "why?"

In December 2002 I contacted Nine Eleven Families for Peaceful Tomorrows with my 1976 US Mililtary Study information and they referred me to Kyle Hence, who was going to be doing a civilian 9-11-01 investigation. I wrote to Kyle Hence and we exchanged emails and talked on the phone about Kyle wanting me to be part of his first news conference in March 2003, in New York City, and that I was to wait for his next communication to tell me when I needed to travel to NYC.

His next email did not arrive, so I thought it was just taking him longer to set up then he thought. Then I see where he had his news conference and had dropped me for Cynthia McKinney. I contacted him that she was one of the elected officials who was responsible for Improving US Air Travel Security during her 5 Terms as Congressional Representative prior to the 9-11-01 Attacks and 'did not' do it. He wrote back that it 'did not' matter to him since she had done other things for him. (Anyone with an average intelligence knows that when someone from Washington, DC does something for you, it means they gave you money.) This made me so angry that I deleted his email or I would have that one for you today also.

In September 2006 I went to Camp Democracy on the Mall in Washington, DC and on Saturday morning, September 16th, I checked what the schedule would be for that day and Kyle Hence was going to be giving a 9-11 Truth presentation; so, I attended. During the Q and A time I asked Kyle Hence (without identfing myself) about the 1976 US Military Study information that was Count III of the Ellen Mariani RICO Lawsuit and why wasn't the 9-11 Truth Movement promoting this information?

Kyle Hence was surprised by this question and he did not know how to answer it and had a worried look on his face. Then he quickly, like a politician, said that it had been covered in his new movie (I will not give it any promotion by naming it) and that I should watch it. So, I gave Kyle Hence the chance to prove that what he said was true and came back later that night to watch it when it was shown in the main event tent. Not one word was mentioned about the 1976 US Military Study in Kyle Hence's movie. Kyle Hence had 'straight faced lied' about him covering the information in his movie. (If Kyle Hence had to 'lie' about him not covering this information in his movie; then what other information has Kyle Hence 'lied' to everyone about?)

Before the house lights were turned back up, I went forward to Kyle Hence and asked him if I could give him some information I had... since he could not see well enough to read what I handed him he took it to read later. I gave him a copy of his email asking me to be part of his first news conference in March 2003. Kyle Hence did not and has not replied to me about why he did a 180 degree turn around on my 1976 US Military Study information- from wanting it to be part of his first news conference in March 2003 to totally censoring it after having contact with Cynthia McKinney. Take the time to write to Kyle Hence and ask him why he has censored the information that has been recognized by the US Federal Court, the US Attorney General's Office under US Attorney General John Ashcroft, the Canadian Government and the international legal panel who wrote up the ICC Criminal Charges agaisnt Tony Blair as being true? Send along his email to me asking me to be part of his March 2003 news conference in New York City.

I received an email from a Mick Stuart, that he received from Glen Ford, co-publisher of the Black Commentator magazine in which he calls me a "Confederate from Georgia who is worshiping his skin and flag; and should be organized AGAINST". Why is Cynthia McKinney's corporation media supporter calling me 'racial slurs' that are as offensive as the 'N-word' comment made by Michael Richards? Here is a link to a photo of me at the San Francisco Anti-War Rally held on October 26,2002: Do I look like a skin head white supremacist from Georgia? http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/20060808/uknewuknew.pdf

Another Democrat I contacted with my 1976 US Military Study information was Jimmy Walter, who wrote back that he thought my information was interesting and would read it further for consideration to promote it. After he read it and found out that it showed that his Democratic Political Party was 'equally' involved he refused to promote it and instead censored it for the Democratic Political Party.

Other Democratic Political Party 9-11 (self annointed) Truth Movement Leaders I have contacted are: Jim Marrs, Jim Fetzer, Kevin Barrett, David Ray Griffin, Michael Moore and Bob Bowman, who all have censored my United States Defense Department US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information. At the 9-11-2006 events in New York City Jim Marrs stood on stage and yelled at the top of his lungs, stomped his foot, pounded his fist on the podium and waved it in the air about the US Government finding an airliner hi-jacking scenario on a confiscated laptop in 1995. If this information made Jim Marrs yell at the top of his lungs; then, why, when he was given (two or more times) the information that, not only did the US Government have the hi-jacking scenario of the confiscated laptop, but also had created it in the 1970's, by the US Defense Department, then make him come totally unglued (?) instead of making him censor it? Have you seen Jim Marrs ever promote the 1976 US Military Study information? Why not? Please contact him and ask him why.

You can also contact and ask the other Democrats I have named and ask them why they have censored my 1976 US Mililtary Study information, when it is the only US Government 9-11-01 prior knowledge information that has been 'publicly confirmed' as being true by the US Government?

In March 2005 internet jouralist Greg Szymanski wrote an article about the 1976 US Military Study and it was picked up by a few internet news sites overseas... in Germany, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Brazil by June. I found this out one day near the end of June while doing a Google Search and was going to have my webmaster put links to these articles online, following the 4th of July Holiday, but this did not happen; the FBI came to my home instead.

On July 6, 2005, four FBI Agents came to my home in Bellingham,Wa., under the guise of wanting to talk to me about an information request I sent to them over a year ago. At first they were civil and then they became belligerent and demanded my DoD ID Card. When I balked at this one of the agents who said he was from the Seattle FBI Office yelled in my face that; "if I did not give them my DoD ID Card they were going to go to the Bellingham Police for reinforcements come back and tear my apartment apart"!

When they did this, I knew that they were trying to escalate the situation into a physical confrontation with me, since it was a 4 to 1 advantage to the FBI with all of the Agents being in their 20's or 30's, in weightlifer condition ,and me in my 50's with heart disease. I knew that if I wrestled them for my ID Card, they would stress out my Heart and cause another heart attack... so, I decided to get a Lawyer to take the FBI to court over this illegal confiscation of my DoD ID Card.

The legal reason the FBI gave for their confiscation was: FBI Special Agent Lance Boyer had never seen a DoD ID card before. Not even the Patriot Act gives the FBI this legal authority and there is a simple reason he had never seen a DoD ID Card before; Lance Boyer does not have a DoD Security clearance. I got a receipt for my ID card.

Following the FBI leaving I contacted the ACLU who refused to provide me with legal services.

I contacted Greg Szymanski, who wrote another article about the FBI raid on my home, to include him calling the FBI Office, who confirmed they had gone to my home and confiscated my ID Card but would not give details about the legallity of their actions.

I continued to look for a Lawyer, and, after 3 months of lawyers telling me "No", I thought; 'what can I do myself'? So, I filed an investigation request with the Seattle Office of the US Marshall, who reviewed my incident report and forwarded it to the US Attorney General's Office for further investigation. To date the US Attorney General has done nothing with my request.

I have continued to look for a lawyer to represent me, but none will. In March 2007 I talked to Ms.Fulton, a lawyer from Seattle, who refused to provide me with legal services after it was explained to her that it was a political case instead of a criminal case. When I asked her if she could tell me of a lawyer who might help me; she said; "No lawyer was going to represent me"! The lawyers do not want to have themselves, their law firms, family or friends to be put on the FBI Domestic Spying list.

Please investigate all information I have given you to find out why the Democratic Political Party has been censoring this information from you for over 5 years, beginning with Cynthia McKinney in April of 2002. I have a website with some of this info posted:


Thank you,
United States Defense Department Intelligence Investigative Office Supervisor to the Office of the Secretary of Defense,
Timothy S. McNiven


Supporting Links, Documentation, and messages of Support:

My Website:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com

A supporting email:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/2006-07/7...searchgroup.pdf

The Mariani Lawsuit:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/docs/mariani_lawsuit.pdf

My sworn affidavit:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/docs/affidavit.pdf

ACLU Rejection Letter:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/jan2006/l...r_from_ACLU.jpg

U.S. Marshals Service Response:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11042005/usmarshals2.jpg

Communications:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer22.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer29.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer30.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer31.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer32.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer33.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer34.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer35.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer36.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/11232005/lawyer37.jpg

Supporters:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/images/supporters1.jpg
http://www.codenamegrilfire.com/images/supporters3.jpg
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/images/supporters4.jpg

Greg Szymanski Articles in The Arctic Beaxon:
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/9-Mar-2005.html
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/23-Mar-2005.html
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/13-May-2005.html
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/31-Jul-2005.html



Original post of this letter:
http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread283741/pg1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
democrazy
post May 23 2007, 04:17 PM
Post #8





Group: Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 151



BS angry.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
datars
post May 23 2007, 04:23 PM
Post #9


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 997
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



QUOTE (democrazy @ May 23 2007, 01:17 PM)
BS angry.gif

Not!

I have all the documentation on my HD about Timothy. Itís the read deal!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
democrazy
post May 23 2007, 05:30 PM
Post #10





Group: Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 151



"I Helped The U.S. Army Plan The 9/11 Attacks"

The plan if you please, all i see is blahblah1.gif blahblah1.gif bout the aftermath and a good storyteller.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
datars
post May 23 2007, 05:36 PM
Post #11


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 997
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



QUOTE (democrazy @ May 23 2007, 02:30 PM)
"I Helped The U.S. Army Plan The 9/11 Attacks"

The plan if you please, all i see is blahblah1.gif blahblah1.gif bout the aftermath and a good storyteller.

No storyteller here. So the only Blah is you!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bill
post Aug 11 2007, 02:58 PM
Post #12





Group: Guest
Posts: 1,922
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 147



Jus tfound this on another website


interesting website





http://members.cox.net/scappero/ScapperoHome.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Aug 11 2007, 03:34 PM
Post #13





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Fascinating story Bill, thanks for the link.

Even though I understand full well it was an inside job, stories like McNiven's still blow my mind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Apr 28 2009, 09:11 PM
Post #14



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



[Also see this interesting article:]

http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=22&id=27

Second Arcticbeacon interview
THIS IS A LOCAL ARCHIVE
ORIGINAL DOCUMENT LOCATION:
http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/arti...18131/23265.htm

Threats Don't Stop Information Leak About Our Military's 1976 Plan to Blow Up WTC
Former GI not concerned about death threats and releases names of others who participated in what has been called 'the perfect terrorist plan' devised by our own military to bring down the WTC with airplanes and box cutters.
March 23, 2005

By Greg Szymanski

A former U.S. Army corporal and Department of Defense (DOD) operative has

received a number of death threats after releasing information his military unit

in 1976 was commissioned by Congress to create the perfect terrorist plan to

level the WTC with airplanes and box cutters.

Timothy McNiven, under contract with the DOD, claims the threats were

transmitted by email and snail mail from unknown origins in what he calls on ongoing

harassment campaign to keep him quiet about the government sponsored "perfect

terrorist plan," almost identical to what happened on 9/11.

McNiven, however, disregarded the threats, telling his story to the AFP. His

account first appeared in last week's edition.

Besides personal threats, he also claims other members of his 1976 unit,

including one named Sgt. Riggs, were also threatened. Sgt. Riggs and more than 100

of McNiven's unit members have not come forward or spoken publicly about his

accusations.

"I am just one of the enlisted men who took part, but I can confirm it took

place and our plan was just like what went down on 9/11," said McNiven. "There

were about 100 people from my unit involved and I am actively seeking help to

find them.

"Sgt. Riggs told me one day that he and others had their wives and children

threatened by the U.S. Government with retaliatory acts if they were to

release their information to the media. But he said if I could break the censorship

and get to the media first, he then would come forward and tell what he knows."

The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army,

stationed in Strasbourg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the

Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial

airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.

McNiven first went public with the hidden purpose behind the Congressional

study in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO)

lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004.

The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to

identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However,

McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the

perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.

To back up his story, he passed a credible lie detector test, testified in a

sworn affidavit contained in a federal 2004 RICO lawsuit file against Bush and

provided the names of the men in his 1976 unit.

McNiven claims to have lost contact with the members of his unit, but he

especially is interested in finding Lt. Michael Teague, the officer in charge of

the unit who gave the specific orders to devise the mock 9/11 plan.

"I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100

story building to the Twin Towers," said McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague

was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.

"He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to

blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse

on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing

we devised in the 1976."

McNiven said he was originally told by Lt. Teague "never to go public" about

the contents of the details and findings of the mock terrorist plan. But later

for unknown reasons Lt. Teague changed his mind, perhaps due to guilt

feelings, giving him direct orders to go public if anything like 9/11 ever occurred

in the future.

"I was given the direct order, which I feel I am still under, that if the

Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to

do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the

American people,
" said McNiven..

"I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically

told that this order was never to be rescinded - never - because those who would

rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American

people."

Besides Lt. Teague and Sgt. Riggs, he is hoping others in his unit will come

forward with more details in order to verify his story.

THIS IS A LOCAL ARCHIVE

ORIGINAL DOCUMENT LOCATION:
http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/arti...18131/23265.htm
--------------------------------------------
"I am willing to take additional polygraph exams to prove I am telling the

truth until other participants in the study come forward," added McNiven.
--------------------------------------------
Some of the other members of his unit, names provided by McNiven, include

Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt Maj. McKay, Sgt Middleton, Sgt

Arroyo, Sgt Murray, Sgt Edwards, Sgt Broder, Sgt Steadman, Sgt Wolford, Sgt Jackson,

Sgt Garza, Sgt Meralas, Sgt Taraza, Sgt Spears, 1st Sgt Ray, Sgt Terry

Henderson, Sgt Barber, Cpl Picket, Cpl Wisner, Richard Seanz, Berni Domoski, George

Cinch, Harry Waldren, Tom Kimber, Rick Lyons, Michael Hubbert, Dan Henderson,

Martian Seals, Jake Asuit, Bruce Levine, Thomas Gumbs, Rick Bruns, Dennis

Montoya, Phlash Richardson, Fetch, Bob Bender, Johnson, Drew Cousins and Terry Cook

Greg Szymanski
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McNiven's Affidavit .PDF is available at:
http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/docs/affidavit.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Apr 28 2009, 09:13 PM
Post #15



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



http://www.reopen911.org/ReOpen911_2007Archive/76plan.htm

Army Theorists Crafted Model of 9/11 Attack Back in 1976.

by Greg Szymanski
This is a very important article because it shows the degree of long-term planning that went into these attacks. It should be noted that from November 1975 until January 1977 the Director of Central Intelligence was none other than George H.W. Bush. (C.B.) (ed..)

The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level the Twin Towers
Created In 1976

By Greg Szymanski
Exclusive to American Free Press

Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC using commercial airliners and box cutters as weapons.

The laundry list of terrorist warnings handed to the Bush administration prior to 9/11 makes the President and others look like "bumbling idiots or a bunch of conniving criminals" responsible for the mass murders at the Twin Towers and in Afghanistan and Iraq.

These are the harsh words of Timothy McNiven, an outspoken critic of the President's handling of 9/11 and a 29-year U.S. Defense Department operative still under contract with the government.

He says not only did the Bush administration purposely ignore Al Q'aida in the months preceding the WTC attacks, but the situation is even more disturbing, considering his military unit way back in 1976 devised a mock terrorist attack of the Twin Towers exactly like what occurred on 9/11. McNiven, who first went public in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004, claims his unit was ordered to create the "perfect terrorist plan" using commercial airliners as weapons and the Twin Towers as their target.

The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.

The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.

To silence critics, McNiven has successfully passed a credible lie detector test regarding his participation in the study as well as other specific orders given to him by his superiors in case of a real attack on the Twin Towers.

The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.

McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that "the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976."

"I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100 story building to the Twin Towers," recalled McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.

"He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we devised in the 1976."

Since that ominous realization, McNiven has devoted his entire life to alerting the American public about the similarities between 9/11 and the 1976 study without much success, his story basically being ignored by politicians and the mainstream media.

"Why am I doing this? Why have I spent every waking hour trying to bring this story to the American people?" asked McNiven, claiming he still is following a strange direct military order given to him more than 25 years ago. "During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I'd go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers."

However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds.

"I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people. "I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded - never - because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people."

Besides taking a lie detector to verify his story, McNiven has made public a detailed list of about 40 names of those individuals who took part in the mock terrorist plan, including Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt. Middleton, Sgt. Arroyo and many others.

"There were also people from the Defense Department and the CIA who were monitoring the study, but I wasn't able to get their names," he added. Some of McNiven's most recent assignments with the Defense Department include work on the Northwest Drug Task Force and various other drug smuggling and weapons trafficking cases.

March 9, 2005:
"If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." (George H.W. "Poppy" Bush)

Finis

First published on the front page of the March 21, 2005, issue of American Free Press (Volume V, No. 12)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th September 2019 - 06:19 AM