IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
Question For Atc/pilots, regarding aviation language
woody
post Jan 9 2007, 04:14 PM
Post #1


Woody Box


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 231
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 20
Here's the dialogue between two NEADS technicians after learning that another airliner - Delta 89 - is hijacked.


09:40:57
ROUNTREE: Delta 89, that's the hijack. They think it's possible hijack.
DOOLEY: f*ck!
ROUNTREE: South of Cleveland. We have a code on him now.
DOOLEY: Good. Pick it up! Find it!
MALE TECH: Delta what?
ROUNTREE: Eight nine—a Boeing 767.
DOOLEY: f*ck, another one—

My question: What does "We have a code on him now" mean? Has the FAA tagged the target so NEADS can identify it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Jan 9 2007, 04:34 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1
Robin or Andrew would be better to answer that question.. but from my standpoint it appears to be a hijack code.. 7500. (which anyone can google.. for those who may think im giving away classified info)

Where did you find that woody? Link to source? Got the audio clip?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Jan 9 2007, 04:58 PM
Post #3


Woody Box


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 231
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 20
It's from the Vanity Fair article about NORAD:

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/feature...8?currentPage=8

Unfortunately, they have replaced the original URL with this one and skipped the little audio snippets. Schade, schade...wonder why the did it.

Would be great if someone has saved the audio clips. I didn't. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/doh1.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
waterdancer
post Jan 10 2007, 03:09 AM
Post #4


Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog


Group: Library team
Posts: 1,696
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 77
That tape and article get what I consider to be a great critique by David Ray Griffin here:
9/11 Live or Fabricated: Do the NORAD Tapes Verify The 9/11 Commission Report?

I'm not saying that looking into the tape further doesn't have merit, I think it does. Just keeping in mind that it may be another "story".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Research · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic · Subscribe to this forum


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 01:39 AM
Powered By IP.Board © 2013  IPS, Inc.