IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Frank Legge And Warren Stutt Debunked

rob balsamo
post Jan 11 2014, 03:21 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



The following is from our "Debunking FDR Debunking" thread. I am placing it here in its own thread for easier reference.

The below links contain information, including discussions with "Warren Stutt", which completely and thoroughly debunk the analysis done by "Warren Stutt" and "Frank Legge".

Feel free to share this information with anyone who references such material.

Enjoy!

Warren Stutt Decode Shows Altitude too high to Impact Pentagon
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10778240

Vertical and Lateral Acceleration do not show signs of "impact", proving Longitudinal Deceleration was not due to "impact" as speculated by Legge/Stutt
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794146

Warren Stutt's admitted lack of expertise with respect to FDR Investigation
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10799563

RA - PA Correlation, proving the "Altitude Divergence" calculated by Legge/Stutt was due to RA measuring from an object higher than ground level. Fatal to the Legge/Stutt argument.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794074

If Legge/Stutt "Altitude Divergence" calculations were correct, Aircraft would be slamming into the ground. IAD ILS RWY 01R Approach Analysis, Instruments required for IFR Flight Based on Regulation.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793490

Calculations based on Stutt Theory with respect to RA Tracking Capability, proving Stutt's theory false.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10794159

More confirmation supporting RA Tracking Capability referenced is in fact a longitudinal velocity, and not the vertical velocity as speculated by Legge/Stutt
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803407

Explains Lack Of Attention To Detail in the very first paragraph of the Legge/Stutt "Paper"
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793061

Proof of Legge trying to weasel his way out of mis/disinformation he has presented
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10793501

A Response To Frank Legge And Warren Stutt, P4T rebuttal to Legge/Stutt "Paper" and "Rebuttal"
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21025

Warren Stutt Refuses to Address the tough questions
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803075

Legge/Stutt Admit to Leaving Erroneous References in their paper as a "Honey Pot" trap for readers
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803456

More statements from FDR Expert Dennis Ciminio
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803408
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10803429
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Jan 20 2014, 10:06 AM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



As a pilot that has never worked with a FDR in any capacity, I will take Cimino's word ANY DAY over the layman Stutts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Beachnut
post Feb 25 2014, 03:44 PM
Post #3





Group: Troll
Posts: 6
Joined: 6-June 07
Member No.: 1,124



QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 20 2014, 06:06 AM) *
As a pilot that has never worked with a FDR in any capacity, I will take Cimino's word ANY DAY over the layman Stutts.

And fail
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Feb 27 2014, 04:41 PM
Post #4





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (Beachnut @ Feb 25 2014, 03:44 PM) *
And fail


Do you mean that you consider Stutt's work to be more accurate than Cimino's in the FDR department?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 28 2014, 12:06 PM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 27 2014, 03:41 PM) *
Do you mean that you consider Stutt's work to be more accurate than Cimino's in the FDR department?



Awww... it looks like Beachy is getting lonely since he no longer has anyone to stalk at DP.

Wait, isn't Beachy one of those people who complains that he is banned from this forum? rolleyes.gif

For those who would like to read more on the many failures of Keith "Beachnut" Beachy, see here....

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=20979

dontfeed.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd October 2019 - 05:10 PM