Free Energy, Fire from salt water! Options

[lunk]

I just watched this video:

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3379799417422523172

So I thought I would try this myself, and see if it works.

I got an old glass salt shaker,

mixed some salt and tap water,

stuck in a piece of toilet paper for the wick

placed it in my old microwave oven,

beside a burning candle,

closed the microwave door

and turned it on...

The wet saltwater soaked wick caught fire!

I think I have just broken the second law

of thermodynamics.

lunk

[Timothy Osman]

How long did you nuke it for before it ignited, I just tried the same thing you did for about 20 seconds. I'll get into all sorts of trouble if I blow my wifes microwave up.

[lunk]

I had the old 700 watt microwave on for 1 minute.
The candle flame has to be right above the
salt shaker and wick. The brief (about a second)
bright yellow flame appeared near the end of that time.
Once the microwave started to boil the salt water
it was over. I think the radio frequencies used
in the video are different from a microwave.

I don't recommend using a good microwave for
this experiment.

[lunk]

"Microwave ovens use 2450Mhz( Res of water)
and the resonance freq. of hydrogen is 1420Mhz."

I have a very well used microwave.
It takes longer to boil water than it used to.


Has anybody else got this to work?

[Timothy Osman]

My experiment has been terminated by the terminator, Kitchen variety.

It's interesting but like all these things it usually turns out they're using far more energy to get their results then they're generating.

[lunk]

I used to have a very old chemistry book from the turn
of the previous century. In it was described a method
of welding where an electric spark zapped hydrogen gas,
the result was a mono atomic form of hydrogen that
burned at 5000 degrees C.

Seems like a lot of energy from an electric spark...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=F5PvIPgJGx0

I built one of these too.

[Sanders]

I tried it too, lunk. But my salt shaker has a metal cap and I accidentally blew up my kitchen (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)




(yeah, I know, not very funny. sorry, couldn't resist (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) )

[lunk]

Don't put metal in the microwave.

I've tried to repeat this experiment
a number of time now and have not
yet replicated the original affect.

I have a hunch that it might be my
old microwave or the one operating it.

more stuff on free energy:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1998211527319165822

explanation of what's happening:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7973590161121140087

lunk

[lunk]

I'm still searching for a "do it yourself" free energy device.
Has anyone heard of the Joe cell?

http://pesn.com/2006/04/16/9600261_Joe_Cell_instructions/

I used to think that neutral water didn't conduct electricity,
I discovered ,by experiment, that pure water does conduct.

lunk

[lunk]

What does "free energy" have to do with 9/11?

Everything. If energy is really freely available
(and it's just being suppressed) there would be
no war over oil and we could all be less
dependent on the current system.

If you have a link to a possible "free energy"
technology, please post it in this thread.

thanks, lunk

[lunk]

Interesting, the US govt. issued this patent back in 2000.

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6024935.html

So, I guess, free energy does exist.

cheers, lunk

[lunk]

Found another free energy thing:

Does it produce more energy than it uses?

http://www.icehouse.net/john34/bedinibearden.html

I guess I'll have to build one...

[lunk]

Update on the "Joe cell."

The Joe cell consists of 3 or more lengths of
stainless steel tubing, of increasing diameters,
submerged in pure water and plugged into a
direct current to charge (12 v battery charger).
The tubes are only connected by the water.

Aluminum can also be used but it breaks down
quickly.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=SDXv-Rj8tks

It's designed like a capacitor.

When first plugged in, nothing happens.
then after about a minute tiny bubbles
start to form on the cylinders.
As time goes on the bubbles get bigger
and rise to the surface and silently burst.
This is simple electrolysis.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=kfFKgzZr9Tc

Disconnect the charger.

Wait a day, plug in the charger,
bubbles start to form again, then rise
but this time they stay on the surface
as a froth like on top of a cappuccino.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=GudjUTHoubo

It's like the properties of the water are
changing.

Don't try this in a sealed container.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=ryL-MSNszb8

cheers, lunk

[lunk]

For anyone wanting to pursue
free energy in its' many forms:

http://www.overunity.com

be prepared to read...

cheers, lunk

[lunk]

Interestingly enough, there is a thread there:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1312.0.html

dealing with 9/11...

(hehe)

lunk

[lunk]

This may, or may not be, related to free energy.

Everyone knows what a gyroscope is::

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroscope

It resists a change in the angle of spin;
that's why it's easier to keep upright
on a bicycle, unicycle or motorcycle at higher speeds,
than at slower speeds.

Now, if I had 3 or more connected gyroscopes
spinning around me, and I could change the
angle of all of them at once, could this create lift,
as a force greater than the resistance in
the gyroscopes, in their change of angle?

I guess this is a question for all the aviators
and physicists out there.

humbly, lunk

[lunk]

No propeller, no jets,
for propulsion,
just a change in angles
of the gyroscopes.

If this works..
it could revolutionize flight.

If not...
at least hopping.

lunk

[Timothy Osman]

You might enjoy these Julius Sumner Miller video's. I remember watching him as a kid, he makes physics funny.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKCdq6X08Sw...related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwkUNrSCNMg...related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyw9uNF4nmE...related&search=

[lunk]

This certainly proves that
the pancake theory is bunk,
in my mind.

Thx, for the vids.

[lunk]

Explanation:
It takes time to accelerate
a mass at rest.
Each floor was a stationary
heavy mass.
(Trusses plus the weight of a
metal floor covered with
4 inches of concrete,)
Therefore, there is no way
the twin towers could have fallen
at, or even near, free fall speed,
as they, undeniably, did.

Now, you know,
it's a fact.

lunk