IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Wow! Has Anyone Seen This Video., Id like to hear what the pros here think

shug7272
post Sep 5 2007, 11:34 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 89
Joined: 18-August 07
Member No.: 1,750



Video

This is something else. Why has it taken this long for it to come out?

ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shoon
post Sep 6 2007, 02:20 AM
Post #2





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 202
Joined: 22-October 06
Member No.: 126



Because some is interrupting it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl Bank
post Sep 6 2007, 06:20 AM
Post #3





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



QUOTE (shug7272 @ Sep 6 2007, 05:34 AM)
Video

This is something else. Why has it taken this long for it to come out?

ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif

Good flick, indeed.

But why does it state that both the "Missles at the WTC"-
and the "No plane at the Pentagon"-theories are disinfo
and UA93 is the real smoking gun?

is reminded of Killtowns selfish desire for fame: Carl
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guinan
post Sep 6 2007, 08:35 AM
Post #4


Location: Netherlands


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,702
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Netherlands
Member No.: 72



I've always thought the Shanksville crashsite looked artificial.

Airplanewings are made of aluminium and are hollow - if I have been informed correctly -. Even the tanks couldn't have been full anymore.
Then how is it that all these miracle-wings on 911 reacted as if they were made of solid steel?

The WTC-crashes are weird enough, but after all, there was only air behind those walls, so, with those high speeds, well, who knows?

But at Shanksville those hollow aluminium wings went straight into the solid ground - and just went on going in for at least 3 yards (don't know the exact size of wings), in order for them to be buried to the point of non-visibility!?
Also, where on those 'wing-scars' are the holes made by the engines?

The same of course goes for the fuselage. I can accept that the fuselage would - for a large part - have burrowed itself into the ground... but all of it ???? A giant empty toothpaste-tube ??? And then the ground just 'closes up' behind it???
It has always reeked of Hollywood to me.

And last but not least, the Petagon. Those wings first conveniently broke off so they couldn't make a hole in the wall and then evaporated.... yeah sure !!


Nothing new here to any of you of course, I just had to vent some frustration...

G
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
georgie101
post Sep 6 2007, 08:36 AM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 1,221
Joined: 20-October 06
From: south london, uk
Member No.: 114



Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
Agree with what Carl just said too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shug7272
post Sep 6 2007, 01:23 PM
Post #6





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 89
Joined: 18-August 07
Member No.: 1,750



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Sep 6 2007, 05:20 AM)
QUOTE (shug7272 @ Sep 6 2007, 05:34 AM)
Video

This is something else. Why has it taken this long for it to come out?

ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif

Good flick, indeed.

But why does it state that both the "Missles at the WTC"-
and the "No plane at the Pentagon"-theories are disinfo
and UA93 is the real smoking gun?

is reminded of Killtowns selfish desire for fame: Carl

To tell you the truth I dont know. I have never paid much attention to the messenger, just the message. Thats why I bring things to you guys, trained eyes. To see if there is a problem with the message or "evidence". biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Sep 6 2007, 10:02 PM
Post #7





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,016
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



I had heard the audio portion before, probably here at PFT. Something about it sounds staged to me. Ain't nuthin new with the video.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Sep 7 2007, 09:31 AM
Post #8



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,983
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Looks to me like just
another entrance to the
same old rabbit hole.


lunk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shoon
post Sep 18 2007, 11:37 AM
Post #9





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 202
Joined: 22-October 06
Member No.: 126



How was this scar made before 1994? dunno.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cary
post Sep 18 2007, 01:23 PM
Post #10


Ragin Cajun


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,691
Joined: 14-August 06
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Member No.: 5



It could be a natural hole there. Blow some explosives in the middle of it and then claim that the sides of the hole were "wing impact craters."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shoon
post Sep 18 2007, 01:43 PM
Post #11





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 202
Joined: 22-October 06
Member No.: 126



Then why did any plants not glow there?

I need to more informaiton of this large scar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aldo Marquis CIT
post Sep 19 2007, 04:25 PM
Post #12


Citizen Investigator


Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,179
Joined: 16-August 06
Member No.: 10



It's not the same scar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shoon
post Sep 21 2007, 02:40 AM
Post #13





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 202
Joined: 22-October 06
Member No.: 126



So this video shows wrong scar?

Even so I still want to know how it is made.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SwingDangler
post May 14 2008, 12:46 PM
Post #14





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 154
Joined: 1-March 07
From: Indiana
Member No.: 711



Has anyone been able to verify the USGS photo as highlighted in the video? If so, please link it up!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Killtown
post May 16 2008, 05:41 PM
Post #15





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 170
Joined: 10-May 08
Member No.: 3,317



The '94 scar is not the same as the 9/11 scar, however I believe the 9/11 scar was a natural scar as the '94 was. I think the 9/11 scar was a drainage ditch and the perps just dropped a bomb in the middle of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Killtown
post May 16 2008, 05:44 PM
Post #16





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 170
Joined: 10-May 08
Member No.: 3,317



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Sep 6 2007, 05:20 AM) *
is reminded of Killtowns selfish desire for fame: Carl

Yeah go f*ck yourself "Carl".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl Bank
post May 16 2008, 06:57 PM
Post #17





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



QUOTE (Killtown @ May 16 2008, 03:44 PM) *
Yeah go f*ck yourself "Carl".


Brilliant. handsdown.gif

loves ya, too: Carl
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Leslie Landry
post May 19 2008, 08:26 PM
Post #18





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,107
Joined: 2-May 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,264



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Sep 6 2007, 05:20 AM) *
Good flick, indeed.

But why does it state that both the "Missles at the WTC"-
and the "No plane at the Pentagon"-theories are disinfo
and UA93 is the real smoking gun?

is reminded of Killtowns selfish desire for fame: Carl



Why did it say this? Because its the person who made the video's interpretation based on his opinion.

I would also like to add that the markings that were made in 1994 are much longer in '94 then it apears to be in '01. I say "apears" because i have not went and researched this yet..but plan to to find out how true this is. I will try and find the satalite picture from 9'11 to determine if this is infact true.

But as it stands right now...if those markings where there since '94...then the people that live around there are not dumb..they know its there and would have said something. That would be like going out to some farm in the country and digging deeper into some mans Well and saying "hey look, i found water".
At this moment, i can not take this video too seriously.

I did like the part tho when the guy said "the 9/11 Drug is wearing off" lol
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2019 - 09:03 AM