The Eleventh Of September Two Thousand And One, A view from down under Options

[23investigator]

If I may I would like to start a topic in this Forum

11-9-2001, it is interesting that this adds to -23- adds to 5,-pentagon-.
[Just an observation].
But perhaps it points in a certain direction.

Why bring these thoughts forward in this Forum.
Well, the terrible 'events' which rocked America and shocked the rest of the world, were in fact a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
They were totally 'indiscriminate', any of us could have been victim, if we just happened to be there.
That is, [excluding those who possibly 'knew' it was going to happen, and made sure they were not going to be any where near].
By whatever means.
'Direct involvement', or 'prior warning', 'pre-emption'.

What is the 'suggested' tying factor to the events?
Four 'hijacked aircraft', by influences outside of the country AMERICA.

It only needs one of those assumptions to 'fall over', to bring a very big question over authenticity.

So four aircraft went missing, but not one hard piece of evidence has been brought forward to qualify that any one of the four aircraft was directly involved in striking the world trade centre, or pentagon, buildings.
Oh yes, certain flight recorder 'boxes' were 'recovered', [ironically], how convenient.
But do they prove that any of the four aircraft actually struck any of the three buildings.
Not at all, how can they, [that's hanging one right out there!!].

There is [purported] 'video', of one of the aircraft striking the southern tower at the world trade centre. This can not be considered to be more than that. Witness account at the immediate time of the event at the southern tower, does not support the opinion that the aircraft they were reporting about, was a passenger aircraft.

Video of an aircraft [purported] to have struck the north tower at the world trade centre, can hardly be considered to prove that the aircraft involved was a passenger aircraft. More significantly, it appears from careful consideration of frames of the footage, that the image of what ever was recorded at the time, is not as clear as it could possibly be. But even so the evidence within the image does not suggest that the aircraft was of the dimension of a passenger aircraft. The audio associated with the video, again does not support the opinion of a large two engined passenger aircraft at such a low altitude.

As I have submitted, video evidence of whatever aircraft struck the Pentagon building does not support the opinion of a large two engined passenger aircraft actually striking the building.
Quite the contrary, a relatively small aircraft, [although with very wide wings for its size, 116 feet, seems much more likely from an accumulation of parts of image in videos and still photographs, strongly suggesting a particular aircraft.

If this should prove to be so, it then raises a very serious question.
How could influences outside the country America, have gained access to such an aircraft.

There is one apparent common factor between the three events.
By careful consideration of frames of video of each event, the explosion associated with the destruction at the time of impact of the aircraft, in all three cases is "white".
Not a puff of white, that has been suggested on occassion, but significant white explosion.
In fact in the case of the explosion, at the two world trade centre towers, the ultimate red orange hydrocarbon explosion can be sen to emerge through the white explosion.
Also, there is very strong evidence to suggest that the hydrocarbon explosion at the Pentagon was preceded by white explosion.

The question then, must be raised.
How could influences, outside the country America, install incendiary devices on passenger aircraft they purportedly hijacked?

[Travis]

all the hallmarks of False Flag are apparent in each of the events. Ergo, inside job.

[amazed!]

The US government is fairly well populated with Israeli citizens at the highest levels, and has been for several decades at least.

The Military Industrial Complex is very complex indeed, and oh so powerful.