IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Radar To The Rescue: Cessna Skydiver Crash, plane found 200 yds from last radar blip

JackD
post Oct 9 2007, 01:23 PM
Post #1





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 295
Joined: 13-November 06
Member No.: 238



http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/09/plane.cra...ml?iref=topnews

(CNN) -- Searchers planned to take a closer look early Tuesday at the wreckage of a small plane found in the rugged terrain of Washington state.
art.cessna.jpg

A Cessna 208 Caravan plane went missing Sunday with nine skydivers and a pilot aboard.

At least seven bodies were discovered Monday night after searchers spotted the wreckage south of Mount Rainier, according to Yakima Valley Emergency Management spokeswoman Lisa Truhlicka. No signs of life were detected.

The plane had been carrying nine skydivers and a pilot. Officials told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the three people whose bodies had not been found probably did not survive the crash.

The wreckage was in an area with steep terrain among heavy timber and brush, just 200 yards from where the last radar signal from the plane was detected, Yakima County Sheriff's Deputy Dan Cypher said.

The rough conditions and darkness prevented a full search of the wreckage on Monday night, he said.

--------------

would a Cessna 208 Caravan have a transponder, or simply be tracked by primary radar return?

either way, this demonstrates how planes even in mountainous terrain can be tracked by radar, and located fairly precisely.

Planes do not "disappear" from radar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 9 2007, 05:02 PM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



The Cessna probably had a transponder and it was probably working. There are precious few airplanes anymore that do no have one.

The crucial part is the location of the radar site relative to the crash site, and of course, the altitudes involved.

Here in Florida, and elsewhere I'm sure, there are some places with gaps in radar coverage, caused simply by the locations of the radar transmitting site.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan H.
post Oct 2 2011, 01:37 PM
Post #3





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 71
Joined: 24-November 07
Member No.: 2,508



QUOTE (amazed! @ Oct 7 2007, 07:02 PM) *
The Cessna probably had a transponder and it was probably working. There are precious few airplanes anymore that do no have one.

The crucial part is the location of the radar site relative to the crash site, and of course, the altitudes involved.

Here in Florida, and elsewhere I'm sure, there are some places with gaps in radar coverage, caused simply by the locations of the radar transmitting site.


That's true, amazed! But I think those gaps (at least as far as what the military can see) are pretty small, unless you fly beneath a certain altitude, like really low. But I'm sure there are many on here more qualified to answer these questions. I know Jetliners weren't designed to fly low to the ground, but could one do that? I would also love to see a definitive answer as to whether or not it is possible for a professional pilot, but 1 who's never flown a 767 before, to hit any of the targets at the speeds reported, in a simulator with "crash logic," and that was filmed live, with skeptics present. One side says it can be done easily, but PF911Truth have shown pilot's attempting to do this and not being able to--not even experienced 767 pilots! Obviously, both simply can not be true.
I know that the government's story is BS, but I still have no idea what really happened. I don't even know that it was done "from the inside" by the people we think. If it were, why was Cheney so paranoid about more terrorists? He even had his home removed from Google Earth! If any 1 group was the main force behind it, it, I would think: the Mossad. They have the ability, probably the means, and certainly the motive to carry off such an operation. It would also explain the "dancing Israelis" found cheering as they filmed the attacks! I think there were people on our side that knew something was going to happen, and decided not to stop it. But who those people were, I couldn't say. Perhaps Cheney knew, but we might be very surprised to find that the real powers are people who stay in the shadows. Someone(s) was involved on this side, I think, but who I couldn't say, but their numbers must be very low, I would think, and completely "compartmentalized."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 2 2011, 02:06 PM
Post #4





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



My thoughts are that on that fateful morning, many innocent government employees were played like pawns, once the operation started. We know that at least one FAA supervisor destroyed tapes in front of others. But the system had been comprised before that criminal act, because the system was spoofed.

There was a training exercise going on, and anybody that has ever served in the military during a fooking training exercise knows what one is. thumbdown.gif

Keep in mind that Cheney is paranoid about everything. I've never met the man, but I can tell. More than that he is a criminal of the highest order.

Good to see you back! cheers.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2019 - 08:21 PM