IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
One Picture Worth A Thousand Words, ::picture of WTC Ground Zero::

Fatrix
post Oct 26 2006, 08:55 PM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 14



Is this supposed to look like the structural failure of two 110-story buildings? Doesn't look like a structural failure to me.... more like, the resault of a controlled demolition. What do you think?

(IMG:http://haznata.com/wtcgroundzero2.jpg)

CLICK HERE TO ENLARGE (3413x2730)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Oct 26 2006, 09:08 PM
Post #2


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



Yep. That's not a stack of pancakes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lights
post Oct 27 2006, 08:42 AM
Post #3





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 320
Joined: 23-October 06
From: Evansville, IN USA
Member No.: 150



Yep, looks like a controlled demolition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Robyn623
post Oct 27 2006, 12:10 PM
Post #4





Group: Newbie
Posts: 272
Joined: 17-October 06
Member No.: 101



I don't know how anyone could take a look at that picture and think the floors collapsed on top of each other.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fatrix
post Oct 27 2006, 12:27 PM
Post #5





Group: Newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 14



QUOTE (Robyn623 @ Oct 27 2006, 04:10 PM)
I don't know how anyone could take a look at that picture and think the floors collapsed on top of each other.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) Pffft.... tin-foil-hat weirdos!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
waterdancer
post Oct 28 2006, 04:50 AM
Post #6


Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog


Group: Library team
Posts: 1,696
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 77



Now that would have been a good position to have been in to show the massive hole, er I mean smoke on WTC 7 clearly, huh? Of course, the smoke from WTC 6 would have gotten in the way, but at least we would have known they were trying if we had a 9/11 pic from that angle with that kind of resolution...

Instead, I now have about 100 or so images from the West St./Vesey area and pretty much zilch as far as showing lower (below floor ten, say) south face (or smoke). Shots from the east, shots from the west, a shot from the roof of WTC 5, I've seen all of those. Still haven't seen any massive hole (except in the SW corner, of course).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
forester
post Nov 2 2006, 11:54 AM
Post #7


parky76sock


Group: Troll
Posts: 152
Joined: 27-October 06
Member No.: 173



what should the pile look like if it was brought down by structural failure?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
waterdancer
post Nov 2 2006, 12:55 PM
Post #8


Polymeta.com search Sibel Edmonds bradblog


Group: Library team
Posts: 1,696
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 77



Probably more concrete, for one thing, even if we assume a total collapse. The first two images are borrows from a "debunking site", which seems to have gotten them from here. If it was not a complete collapse (much more likely) it would proably look more like some of the earthquake damage photos which you may have seen. Still, lots of concrete. Now, I'll grant you that these pictures aren't of steel frame buildings which had fires in them. Still, last time I checked, fires don't generally turn concrete into microscopic concrete powder. CDs do. Highly unlikely that it would look like a bunch of pickup sticks scattered around on the ground for hundreds of feet in all directions, IMO.
3rd - 5th images source
Image 6 source
images 7 and 8 source
(IMG:http://911myths.com/assets/images/aplaza.gif)
(IMG:http://911myths.com/aPlaza_Big.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_LAmbiancePlaza.JPG)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_FairfaxCollapse.JPG)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_FairfaxCollapse2.JPG)
(IMG:http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/collapse/docs/ronanpt.gif)
(IMG:http://web.archive.org/web/19980129115748/http://eqe.com/publications/kobe/building/bu17-30.jpg) (IMG:http://web.archive.org/web/19980129115748/http://eqe.com/publications/kobe/building/bu26c30.jpg)

This post has been edited by waterdancer: Nov 10 2006, 03:36 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
v2rot8
post Nov 2 2006, 07:58 PM
Post #9





Group: Guests
Posts: 22
Joined: 28-August 06
Member No.: 22



Maybe the same folks who planned and constructed the "Big Dig" in Boston are the same ones who built the WTC, only years earlier.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Nov 8 2008, 11:23 AM
Post #10





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



I dont see any floors pancaked on top of each other at ground zero, so obvious it was a controlled demolition, it certainly was not a pancake collapse, all i see is a huge f*cking crater at ground zero where the towers sat like someone planted a huge bomb in the basement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 01:48 AM