Wtc 7 Study By Simon Shack, Interesting rare footage of the big day Options

[ogrady]

Check it out.

I like it, but I admit I'm a fan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgU57pHMEuw

[rob balsamo]

I can definitively say that No Plane hit WTC7, it wasnt even a hologam... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

[KP50]

I can definitively say that No Plane hit WTC7, it wasnt even a hologam... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings. Those thick black lines, so mysterious.

[saturnaspider]

I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings.

Simonshack's witterings aren't pointless, they are disinfo IMHO.

He's there to muddy the waters and has put out a great deal of nonsense mixed up with some genuine truths, this corrupting it and keeping us all flying around in circles.

I personally would advise staying well clear of anything simonshack. Half truths are more damaging than flat out lies as they are more seductive.

My 2 cents

Cheers, Saturna.

This post has been edited by saturnaspider: Jan 28 2009, 10:44 PM

[KP50]

I'd be interested in seeing the rare footage, uninterrupted by SimonShack's pointless witterings. Those thick black lines, so mysterious.

Leslie had posted it already in the WTC 7 section - thanks Leslie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0CU-teE0bQ

[Sanders]

Half truths are more damaging than flat out lies as they are more seductive.

Agreed

[dMz]

I think this is actually one of the more important video clips regarding WTC7:

"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CXQY-bZn4...feature=related

[saturnaspider]

I think this is actually one of the more important video clips regarding WTC7:

"Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."

Yes, good vid, dmole.

Back to Shack:

The problem with Shack and his ilk, as I see it, is that he continues to propogate the spurious notion that the whole body of imagery related to 9/11 was the product somehow of a Future Combat System (FCS).

It is evident to me that fake planes were inserted into actual footage of WTC2 impacts, and of course there were other shenanigans going on, but to suggest, as Shack and his pack does, that things like the burning towers and the falling WTC7 building, were all faked also, is nothing more than slick disinfo, as far as I am concerned.

This all started with Fred/bsregistration and his claim that there was a missing building in the Hezarkhani clip. This claim was based on nothing more than a cynical exploitation of peoples' lack of understanding about perspective rules, and was royally debunked by Sanders and many others. Nevertheless the claims of total TVF continued to build, with suggestions of moving bridges and on and on.

THis seems to be a skilfully managed campaign designed to weaken what was a growing understanding about the No Planes at WTC evidence. It has been effective in this regard, unfortunately.

Simon's wilfull disregard of, and refusal to rectify, the many false claims contained within his "research", despite the fact that these falsehoods have been clearly pointed out to him, suggest to me that he is a major player in this particular disinfo game.

[simonshack]

Dear Saturnaspider,

Would you say the same things about my work now - 2 years on?

Have you put aside a little time to read the articles on my website?

http://www.septemberclues.info

This post has been edited by simonshack: Jun 25 2011, 06:46 PM