IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Hello - I'm Confused.

wishIwasapilot
post Feb 16 2015, 10:36 PM
Post #21





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 21
Joined: 2-December 10
Member No.: 5,484



paranoia wrote: wishiwasapilot - i believe this page might address some of the ntsb vs. commission contradictions:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/techpaperAA77

---------------------------

Have the assertions made in the above link by Pf911truth been debunked by anyone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wishIwasapilot
post Feb 16 2015, 10:56 PM
Post #22





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 21
Joined: 2-December 10
Member No.: 5,484



"The pilot of AA77 was blinded by the morning light, the Sun, so he made the big turn to try to find his intended target, the WH, and failing that took the pentagon as an alternate target."

Flight 77 to The White House?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fM8_EnpvMo4
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Feb 21 2015, 11:25 AM
Post #23





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (wishIwasapilot @ Feb 1 2015, 01:37 PM) *
But hotel, gas station videos were not rare. What gave the FBI the right to waltz in and confiscate personal property, ie. videos?


They have no lawful authority to do that, only the force of government. Obviously, they did it on orders from superiors. The coverup was from the highest levels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
excontroller
post Mar 19 2015, 06:57 PM
Post #24





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 101
Joined: 28-December 09
From: Ypsilanti, MI
Member No.: 4,819



QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jan 21 2015, 10:21 PM) *
Why perfect timing of missile?
How about perfect timing of planted bombs?


Excellent point! The premise totally removes ANY NEED for perfection. I really don't expect this to EVER be resolved. I mean, after 51 years since Kennedy was murdered, the media, when mentioning it, still say Lee Harvey Oswald, the gunman who shot Kennedy.....and the HOUSE Select Committee on Assassinations SAID that a CONSPIRACY apparently DID exist. It's THEIR LIE, and they will simply keep telling it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
excontroller
post Mar 22 2015, 08:27 AM
Post #25





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 101
Joined: 28-December 09
From: Ypsilanti, MI
Member No.: 4,819



QUOTE (JohnS @ Jan 21 2015, 06:05 AM) *
Nice post (from another non-pilot). I second the motion for a "consensus compilation" of aviation-related anomalies, as a concise summary of the most jarring phenomena. Some of it is covered in the 911 Consensus Panel stuff, but there are probably other things this community would highlight.

Emphasis on *consensus*, which would require a process of determination (a decently representative panel that can unanimously agree on certain points), which could be tough on some points.

For example, I believe it is predominantly the contention of experts here that no plane hit the Pentagon, based mainly on the "too high" FDR data and the witness statements about the approach path vis-a-vis the Citgo station. Personally, while I respect that view and understand that a strong case can be made for it (also taking into account the "too small" hole, paucity of debris, weird exit hole, smell of cordite, Rumsfeld's slip-of-the-tongue about a missile, etc.) -- I remain agnostic on that point. I have trouble discounting the other witnesses who claim to have seen the plane come in and hit (I acknowledge the problems with their line of sight), I have trouble with the idea that such a plan would depend to a non-fail-safe degree on a) perfect timing of missile and fly-over, and b) nobody catching the maneuver on their iPhone.

In short, with available evidence, can a true consensus be formed on that point? I am doubtful. On the other hand, "ain't no way Hani Hanjour pulled off that descent" seems virtually incontrovertible to me. So, basically, I love the idea of consensus points and I urge a rock-solid, critique-proof product (to the extent possible) that anticipates and addresses objections.

That's probably my two cents for the year, over to the experts!


Never forget......IF you pay someone enough.....witnesses are EASY to find. You may not even have to pay them much over the long haul.....they just wind up dead in a ditch if they complain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th October 2019 - 11:32 PM