IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Smoke Is Coming From What Building?, new images could be key in debunking

Wingmaster05
post Mar 23 2007, 12:56 PM
Post #1





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 568
Joined: 23-January 07
From: where the lorax sleeps
Member No.: 487



I haven't had time to investigate these photo's yet, but prisonplanet is suggesting that most of the billows of smoke purported to be coming from WTC 7 are coming from 5 and 6. I think i have my buildings confused because what they were saying when i first read this didnt make sense in collaboration with the pictures.

I'm going to class, check it out for yourself.

http://infowars.net/articles/march2007/200307building7.htm

This seemed to be the biggest case for fire causing collapse, did it not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
painter
post Jun 4 2007, 02:30 AM
Post #2


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (biggahthebettah @ Jun 3 2007, 07:16 PM)
Interesting photos! These are the first ones I've ever seen which show that WTC7 had setbacks. I never noticed those before. What's so interesting to me is that the damage wasn't sustained by the setbacks but by the outer walls themselves. I'm no architect, but what I do know about physics suggests to me that these setbacks mean that the lower, outer sections of the building took the brunt of the damage, and that the main "setback" part of the building, would not have collapsed. I'm not sure if I'm making myself clear, but if you drew a line from the inner, or setback, part of the building, top to bottom, there has to by design be columns going from top to bottom.
the lower, outer walls would have their own corner or outer columns. If this part of the building collapsed, the rest of the building should still have its own load bearing columns which would hold it up.

Anyone here get my drift? If not, maybe I can try explaining again. This is really quite an interesting cache of photos! Thanks for finding them.

perhaps I'm not understanding what you are saying but I don't see any 'stepbacks' in 7. Are you sure you're looking at the correct building?

This is 7:





Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2019 - 09:34 PM