Was WTC Brought Down By The Controlled Demolition?, 9 minutes video, which shows a lot Options

[tumetuestumefais...]

Hi,
A colleague from the Czech-Slovak 911 movement have sent me a link to a video (whose original intention was to debunk another debunkers video about WTC7: http://youtube.com/watch?v=IwdD6ERutEI )

But in fact it shows much more than just counterarguments against the above debunkers video.

It shows that from the North tower were during the "collapse" clearly visibly ejected large chunks of its core - cut in pieces of size of several floors, weghting probably at least hundreds of tons - to a considerable distance. They were in past notoricaly confused with the perimeter columns - but perimeter columns were much thinner and mounted with much narower distances.

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/core1.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/core2.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/core3.jpg)

What a force could do something like that? Gravitation?

Ok, and my father is Michael Jackson. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif)

The video also clearly shows the squibs at the southwest corner of the WTC7, exploding just exactly during the collapse of the North tower.

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib1.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib2.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib4.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib5.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib6.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib7.jpg)

(IMG:http://sweb.cz/xmarinx/squib8.jpg)

Is this ultimately confirming the controlled demolition hypothesis of the WTC 7 (and also Twin towers) fall?

The video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=N0RqVtTpIuk

If the video would be deleted from the Youtube, search for "Pull it down, Larry" from buckeye studio production

Merry Christmas or Chanukah

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Dec 22 2007, 01:35 PM

[tumetuestumefais...]

The core collapse is certainly demonstrated by the falling antenna, but the other photos showing the square pieces falling and smoking are not of the core columns, but the famous exoskeleton pieces.  One ended up on I think Building 5.

No, it is the core remains. For the "exoskeleton" they are too massive, having the column distance mount provingly at least 3 times wider than was in case of perimeter structure (the column distance in chunks, compared to the north face 64m reference, is at least 4 meters, while the distance of the perimeter columns was 1m). Without any doubt what shows the video aren't the chunks of the perimeter.
The chunks of the core, derived from trajectory, ended surely not at the building 5 but in the area of building 6. (If they would finish on building 5 it would be need for them to travel ground distance at least 70 meters, which even in the case of the controlled demolition I find highly improbable.) In comparison with the north face size reference they were at least so wide as 6 floors of the North tower and weighted at least several hundreds of tons. No way they would travel so far outside the perimeter in case of a gravitational collapse. Period.
Also the clearly visible squibs during the North tower collapse prove the WTC7 was brought down by the controlled demolition as well. Lump it.
Somebody who is an "extreme poster" on 9/11 truth site should already know, where the WTC5 was relatively to the North Tower. If not, he is either an ignorant or an disinformator.

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Dec 23 2007, 11:05 AM