Flight 175 Turning And Burning, ...i`ve never seen this before! Options

[CocaineImportAge...]

south tower impact

...anybody!?!

[amazed!]

Now we are into hypotheticals Skyarcher, so what's the point?

It seems to me that the point is there were no Boeings at WTC, which I am willing to accept IF somebody can offer some sort of proof. To me, the existence of doctored video proves nothing but the existence of doctored video.

There are too many ordinary people who seemed to have seen and heard the airplanes. I am willing to accept the long-shot theory of holograms too, IF there is some sort of proof.

As I stated above, it seems to me that the exoskeleton with its multiple holes spaced maybe two feet apart could be compared to a sieve. The mass of the airplane was but a tiny fraction of the mass of the building. I am no engineer at all, but it seems the post impact damage appeared consistent with having been struck by the airplanes. And, if one were going to do this, why NOT fly 2 drones into the buildings? The technology to do so is long mature and refined, and airplanes are cheap.

Whatever the equations prove, which have not yet been offered for a long list of reasons, the point is that the buildings were brought down by CD, and the events regarding the airplanes were virtually irrelevant in their demolition.