Flight 175 Turning And Burning, ...i`ve never seen this before! Options

[CocaineImportAge...]

south tower impact

...anybody!?!

[rob balsamo]

Well said amazed! Couldnt have said it better myself... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Has any NPTer tried to take their theories to ae911truth and ask the sheer/tensile strengths used in the outer perimeter? It appears to be rather thin steel, boxed.

(IMG:http://images.quickblogcast.com/81199-71081/fig_B_1.jpg)

I personally know how hard and durable a leading edge of an aircraft is just by feeling it with my own hand... and bumping my own head into it more times than i wish to admit..

Consider that same "arc" (wing) is filled with a fluid (read: uncompressable), and combined with the fact that there are so many witnesses which most NPTers fail to address and/or interview (read: Seeking Witnesses by posting on a forum instead of making calls and walking the NYC streets), the leap of logic from VF to NPT which most NPTers use to 'prove' their theory, is weak and short.

[chek]

Well said amazed! Couldnt have said it better myself... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Has any NPTer tried to take their theories to ae911truth and ask the sheer/tensile strengths used in the outer perimeter? It appears to be rather thin steel, boxed.

(IMG:http://images.quickblogcast.com/81199-71081/fig_B_1.jpg)

I personally know how hard and durable a leading edge of an aircraft is just by feeling it with my own hand... and bumping my own head into it more times than i wish to admit..

Consider that same "arc" (wing) is filled with a fluid (read: uncompressable), and combined with the fact that there are so many witnesses which most NPTers fail to address and/or interview (read: Seeking Witnesses by posting on a forum instead of making calls and walking the NYC streets), the leap of logic from VF to NPT which most NPTers use to 'prove' their theory, is weak and short.

While I'm no mechanical engineer, a couple of years ago, I took the time to check the values attributed by Calum Douglas to the forces required for penetration (ooh, er missus etc. etc.) and they seemed if anything overly reasonable to me.

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic...ger+tanks#48162
To my mind there is no question regarding the WTC strikes happened as they were perceived.

I have since come to the (somewhat speculative) conclusion that the whole NPT at the WTC scam - as espoused primarily by the formally insane Webfairy and Nicointelpro Haupt along with their ragtag bunch of after-the-fact supporters - and designed very cleverly as it is on deliberately misinterpreting 2-D representations of 3-D events (an art in itself which required a finely trained - or more likely fine-art trained - eye) was intentionally designed to muddy the waters regarding no B757 at the Pentagon.

Not a single WTC NPT objection has sustained in over 4 years.
End of story.

This post has been edited by chek: Dec 2 2008, 06:31 PM

[skyarcher]

While I'm no mechanical engineer, a couple of years ago, I took the time to check the values attributed by Calum Douglas to the forces required for penetration (ooh, er missus etc. etc.) and they seemed if anything overly reasonable to me.

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic...ger+tanks#48162
To my mind there is no question regarding the WTC strikes happened as they were perceived.

I have since come to the (somewhat speculative) conclusion that the whole NPT at the WTC scam - as espoused primarily by the formally insane Webfairy and Nicointelpro Haupt along with their ragtag bunch of after-the-fact supporters - and designed very cleverly as it is on deliberately misinterpreting 2-D representations of 3-D events (an art in itself which required a finely trained - or more likely fine-art trained - eye) was intentionally designed to muddy the waters regarding no B757 at the Pentagon.

Not a single WTC NPT objection has sustained in over 4 years.
End of story.

Let me get this straight. In reference to the video under discussion in this thread, you do not think there is anything suspect with it?

Is that correct?