Another Amazing Coincidence Related To The Wtc, By Kevin Ryan |

Jan 7 2008, 05:32 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,271 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Kevin Ryan does an excellent job here connecting the dots.
QUOTE There appears to be a remarkable correlation between the floors upgraded for fireproofing in the WTC towers, in the years preceding 9/11/01, and the floors of impact, fire and failure. The fireproofing upgrades would have allowed for shutdown of the affected floors, and the exposure of the floor assemblies and the columns for a significant period of time. Exactly what work was done during that time? In some sections of the NIST WTC report, the exact floors upgraded are listed. Other sections of the report suggest even more floors were upgraded, a total of 18 floors in WTC 1 and 13 floors in WTC 2, but the additional floors involved are not specified.[1] (click picture for larger size) (IMG:http://www.911blogger.com/files/Correlation2-thumb.jpg) Full Article The pentagon strike just "happened" to be in a reinforced section, and now we find out the same for WTC on both towers. 3 for 3. Geee, what are the odds? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 7 2008, 11:29 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
QUOTE (1999-2000 WTC Tower Construction Upgrades) WTC1 Upgraded 92 to 100 + 102 Impact 93 to 99 Major Fires 93 to 99 + 104 Failure 92 to 100 Correlation Chart of WTC Towers This relationship is unmistakable for WTC 1. Some investigators have pointed out that a number of floors failed simultaneously in this tower, in accordion-like fashion, before the rest of the building began to 'collapse'. These floors seem to match up almost exactly with the floors that were upgraded. Two blueprints for the 1999, 2000 construction upgrades to WTC 2, provided by a supporter, indicated that the work was done at almost exactly the point of impact and failure in that tower. That is, the southeast quadrant of WTC 2 was the focus of the work, at least on the 78th floor (the blueprints provided were for floors 77 and 78 only). It was the southeast quadrant of WTC 2, at and just above floor 78, where flight 175 hit. Another amazing coincidence related to the WTC Extraordinary evidence supporting the INSIDE JOB demolition of the WTC Towers (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif) QUOTE (NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS: WTC TOWERS DESTROYED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION) [Note: I will be speaking with Kevin Ryan, a leading expert on the NIST cover-up, at the Peoria Public Library at 2 pm this Saturday, 10/20/07, 107 N.E. Monroe St., Peoria, IL 61602]
In an amazing about-face, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) has implicitly admitted that its 10,000-page report on the destruction of the Twin Towers is a fraud, and that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. In its recent reply to family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, NIST states: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." Thus NIST euphemistically admits that its 10,000-page report on the Towers does not even pretend to provide any explanation whatsoever for the Towers' total collapse--and that indeed no such explanation is possible without invoking the politically-incorrect idea of controlled demolition. http://911blogger-bans-truth.com/node/12027 |
|
|
|
rob balsamo Another Amazing Coincidence Related To The Wtc Jan 7 2008, 05:32 AM
georgie101 What an unbelievably strange coincidence!
You ... Jan 7 2008, 07:59 AM
jo56 Very interesting! Good find! Jan 7 2008, 10:42 PM
rossgs To the last poster re the NIST report. You should ... Jan 7 2008, 11:57 PM
SPreston Yes I know. The collapse initiation was contrived ... Jan 8 2008, 11:50 AM
rossgs "In its recent reply to family members Bill D... Jan 8 2008, 12:22 PM
KP50 QUOTE (rossgs @ Jan 9 2008, 05:22 AM)"In... Jan 8 2008, 04:28 PM
rossgs I'm good with that.
My own view is that sinc... Jan 9 2008, 12:33 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4826764420... Jan 9 2008, 05:00 PM
KP50 I first saw this film a couple of weeks ago and ha... Jan 9 2008, 07:12 PM
rossgs You must have sent the wrong video as there isnt ... Jan 9 2008, 07:13 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (KP50 @ Jan 9 2008, 06:12 PM)I first sa... Jan 9 2008, 09:34 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (rossgs @ Jan 9 2008, 06:13 PM)You must... Jan 9 2008, 09:40 PM
KP50 QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ Jan 10 2008, ... Jan 9 2008, 10:33 PM
SPreston QUOTE (tumetuestumefaisdubien @ Jan 9 2008, 0... Jan 9 2008, 11:35 PM
dMole QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 7 2008, 02:32 AM)The... Jan 15 2008, 02:31 AM
newton QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 15 2008, 01:31 AM) Doe... Mar 11 2008, 04:13 PM
paranoia regarding smoke plumes at the base of the wtc... Jan 15 2008, 08:23 AM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (paranoia @ Jan 15 2008, 07:23 AM)regar... Jan 15 2008, 10:29 AM
Philadelphia The video does not 'clearly show' a many f... Jan 15 2008, 01:37 PM
tumetuestumefaisdubien QUOTE (Philadelphia @ Jan 13 2008, 03:37 ... Mar 15 2008, 10:00 AM
georgie101 Philadelphia, you got anything to back up your cla... Jan 15 2008, 01:48 PM
Philadelphia QUOTE (georgie101 @ Jan 15 2008, 12:48 PM)Phi... Jan 15 2008, 02:09 PM
amazed! Well that speculation thing works both ways.
Diff... Jan 19 2008, 10:55 AM
newton the smoke coming from the top is easily explained ... Mar 11 2008, 04:19 PM
morninscott This is something i'd noticed quite a while ag... Apr 11 2008, 05:19 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 08:57 PM |