Pentagon Fraud For Dummies, Does it exist? |
  |
Pentagon Fraud For Dummies, Does it exist? |
 Jan 15 2008, 07:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Administrator Posts: 826 Joined: 14-May 07 From: New Zealand Member No.: 1,044  |
Hello all,
Firstly this board has some great evidence exposing the murder and fraud perpetrated at the Pentagon. I have often read that a plane could not have hit the light poles and entered the Pentagon flying level as is indicated by the punch through hole and dodgy CCTV footage - that is the plane would have to still be descending on impact. What I am looking for is something that exposes the fact that this is an impossibility. Whether a diagram showing the topology or a photograph or whatever. The simpler the better - it just has to be enough to draw someone in to thinking about the fraud. Many thanks, KP aka Nick in NZ |
 |
 
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 08:31 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Contributor Posts: 1,168 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 10 |
I don't know if there is proof that it would be "impossible" to level out.
But it is clearly highly unlikely for a massive 757 jumbo jet to do so in 1 or 2 seconds while traveling at the reported speed of 535 mph. Is that fair to say Rob? The trends in the FDR report a descent angle: P4T 10 minute video here. (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/north_far.jpg) (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/north_med.jpg) (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%20folder%202/north_near.jpg) |
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 10:14 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Administrator Posts: 826 Joined: 14-May 07 From: New Zealand Member No.: 1,044 |
Great stuff Aldo, thanks for that. That sets it out nice and clearly.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 10:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Jan 15 2008, 07:31 PM) I don't know if there is proof that it would be "impossible" to level out. Based on the descent rate provided by the NTSB in the FDR data, it is impossible for this aircraft to have pulled out of that dive instantaneously and be level with the lawn as the object is seen on the DoD "5 Frames Video". Namely due to G loads required. Further, the FDR does not show and has not recorded any positive load required to pull out of this dive. Matter of fact, it shows less than 1 G for that segment, again, according to the NTSB. More on vertical speed http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...p?showtopic=106 G Loads required based on Radar Altimeter http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=4801 (scroll down a bit in the original post. G load required highlighted in red.) |
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 11:45 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 1,072 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 75 |
Awesome!
Thanks I've been hesitant to state it like that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 07:44 PM |
