IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Pentagon Flyover full feature presentation now released!, but sadly on google only

Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 25 2008, 09:33 PM
Post #1





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



Stage6 went out of business so I am looking for a different site to host the divx version but the google version is now released:

http://www.thepentacon.com/PentagonFlyover.htm

Feel free to spread the link anyway you can!
thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Feb 25 2008, 10:53 PM
Post #2


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



Cool. Watching now. Looks and sounds great! WHEN CAN I GET A DVD??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 25 2008, 10:55 PM
Post #3





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



QUOTE (painter @ Feb 26 2008, 02:53 AM) *
Cool. Watching now. Looks and sounds great! WHEN CAN I GET A DVD??


No plans to release a dvd for now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Feb 25 2008, 11:20 PM
Post #4


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Feb 25 2008, 06:55 PM) *
No plans to release a dvd for now.



crybaby2.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 26 2008, 12:14 AM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Excellent job guys... especially uncovering that JEMS report regarding a scheduled departure out of Reagan. Ask Woody if he can get the BTS reports of departures out of Reagan, im sure he already has them.

Also, do you have a link to that JEMS report statement?

Again.. great job... nice editing too Craig.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 26 2008, 12:26 AM
Post #6





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



Thanks man.

Yeah that was a score.

http://info.jems.com/911/pdf/jems0402.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 26 2008, 12:31 AM
Post #7





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



I'm pissed though that the google compression knocks the sound a tiny bit off synch.

It's fine in the file.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 26 2008, 12:46 AM
Post #8



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Front page my friend.. .sending to Media contacts now...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 26 2008, 01:08 AM
Post #9





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



oops better republish it the site is down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 26 2008, 01:09 AM
Post #10



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



our site or yours? Both seem to be up for me...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 26 2008, 01:13 AM
Post #11





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Feb 26 2008, 05:09 AM) *
our site or yours? Both seem to be up for me...


It's up now.

That's awesome thanks!
salute.gif


You added an "s" to Citizen though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Feb 26 2008, 01:38 AM
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,675
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



fixed.. i had a few other typos in there as well... smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
riv
post Feb 26 2008, 11:49 PM
Post #13





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 50
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 2,015



I do not agree with every single part of this new doc but definitely most of the arguments are very solid. Well done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aldo Marquis CIT
post Feb 27 2008, 01:25 AM
Post #14


Citizen Investigator


Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,179
Joined: 16-August 06
Member No.: 10



QUOTE (riv @ Feb 27 2008, 04:49 AM) *
I do not agree with every single part of this new doc


Well please, by all means, elaborate.

elaborare per cortesia smile.gif
(Did I get that right?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
riv
post Feb 27 2008, 06:44 AM
Post #15





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 50
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 2,015



QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Feb 25 2008, 03:25 AM) *
Well please, by all means, elaborate.

elaborare per cortesia :)
(Did I get that right?)


Yep it's right :)

One of these things is the alleged white livery (with the blue stripe, similar to the C32 or whatever is called) of the decoy jet. I've counted 29 eyewitness that reported an American Airlines livery, plus 6 that described a silvery fuselage without mentioning a specific airline. I know just a small part are verified, but I don't see this huge evidence that point to this white livery. Also it's important to note that even if the fuselage is polished, wings, engine and wingmount that constitute more than the half of the visible portion of the aircraft from below are painted white. And this could be the reason why we have a small number of white plane reports.
By the way as I said before the doc is still built on solid arguments (and eyewitnesses) and the interpretation of the white livery reports doens't change the thing too much.

This post has been edited by riv: Feb 27 2008, 06:47 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
riv
post Feb 27 2008, 07:20 PM
Post #16





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 50
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 2,015



Anybody alive?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Craig Ranke CIT
post Feb 27 2008, 08:34 PM
Post #17





Group: Contributor
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 75



QUOTE (riv @ Feb 27 2008, 10:44 AM) *
Yep it's right smile.gif

One of these things is the alleged white livery (with the blue stripe, similar to the C32 or whatever is called) of the decoy jet. I've counted 29 eyewitness that reported an American Airlines livery, plus 6 that described a silvery fuselage without mentioning a specific airline. I know just a small part are verified, but I don't see this huge evidence that point to this white livery. Also it's important to note that even if the fuselage is polished, wings, engine and wingmount that constitute more than the half of the visible portion of the aircraft from below are painted white. And this could be the reason why we have a small number of white plane reports.
By the way as I said before the doc is still built on solid arguments (and eyewitnesses) and the interpretation of the white livery reports doens't change the thing too much.



Well the white claim isn't all that necessary for the hypothesis.

We assert it because it was so heavily corroborated by random previously unpublished witnesses that we have found on the street.

29 unconfirmed previous published accounts of AA livery aren't that many if you consider when they were interviewed and who the are etc.

Honest people will embellish details innocently. They don't all have to be liars to report it looked like an AA jet since of course many would have already heard this detail from the news before they were interviewed.

So take the people who are innocently embellishing added with the deliberate liars and operatives and I'm sure they could reach 29 rather quickly.

Each random previously unpublished account is worth more than dozens of previously published accounts that we KNOW consists of many liars.

As the white claim became more corroborated from independent witnesses we found on the street it became something we could not deny and had to report.

But bottom line it's not critical and perhaps it was some sort of hybrid livery of some sort to partially look AA and also blend with reports of the E4B.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Feb 27 2008, 08:37 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
georgie101
post Feb 28 2008, 06:40 AM
Post #18



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 1,221
Joined: 20-October 06
From: south london, uk
Member No.: 114



Great job CIT
Well made, and nicely put together.
Thankyou all for all your hard work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
riv
post Feb 28 2008, 02:05 PM
Post #19





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 50
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 2,015



QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Feb 25 2008, 11:34 PM) *
But bottom line it's not critical and perhaps it was some sort of hybrid livery of some sort to partially look AA and also blend with reports of the E4B.


It's not critical indeed.

BTW, did you try to find Captain Joseph Candelario? Seems like he saw something interesting but we need more details.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
riv
post Feb 28 2008, 08:28 PM
Post #20





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 50
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 2,015



QUOTE (riv @ Feb 26 2008, 04:05 PM) *
It's not critical indeed.

BTW, did you try to find Captain Joseph Candelario? Seems like he saw something interesting but we need more details.


Another thing, who told Scott P. Cook all the details about the 757 path? And did you have a chance to talk with him?

This post has been edited by riv: Feb 28 2008, 08:28 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2014 - 09:42 AM