Barack Obama - "the devil’s spawn", Webster Tarpley "scared shitless" Options

[painter]

I am posting the below for informational purposes only. I received the email quoted late this evening. I can not vouch for either its authenticity or accuracy. RBW

---

Barack Obama - the devil’s spawn.

I already wrote to you on this matter. I don’t know how well you may know Webster Tarpley. He is very highly regarded, and rightly I think, for his book, “The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush,” and for his work on 9-11, especially in revealing the nature of “Able Danger” as the covert basis for establishing the pretext of Islamic high-jackers.

He has been a fierce critic of the Clinton’s in the past. He has been the fiercest critic of the Bushes.
And yet, like me, he finds himself encouraging people to pull out all the stops in opposing Obama, including supporting Hillary. I asked him “Do you mean to say that informed people must support Hillary?” He wrote back:

Voting is the least of it - vote against Obama in whatever way is most congenial to you. But voting is the beginning of political activity only and not the sum total of it. What you need to do is call in to talk radio of all sorts -- Air America, right wingers, anybody and everybody, and denounce Obama as a puppet Manchurian candidate controlled from behind the scenes by Brzezinski. Take that you-tube video you sent me http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9P15YZrnv0
and blast it out to your entire list in ways that you never thought possible. In other words, get political in the full sense of the word.
WGT

I thought I’d share Tarpley’s research and the basis of his conclusions regarding Obama. He is scared shitless, or he would not possibly be able to advocate supporting Clinton.

I’m reminded of 2000 when I ran around desperately arguing with intelligent people that Bush was a fascist, and that people should support Gore, not Nader, or sit idly by. Nobody listened then. Why should now be any different? No reason, but Tarpley asked me to write you so I’m writing you.

BRZEZINSKI SEIZING CONTROL OVER US POLICY IN SLOW-MOTION CREEPING COUP

By Webster G. Tarpley

Washington DC, Feb. 23 -- Events of the past few days indicate that the Zbigniew Brzezinski faction of lunatic Russia haters have now won the upper hand inside the secret councils of the Anglo-American finance oligarchy, displacing the hitherto dominant George Shultz-neocon faction. Although George Bush and his cronies still occupy the White House, the policies that are being carried out are coming from the Brzezinski left CIA machine. Brzezinski has returned to public prominence in recent months due to his role as top establishment controller for the Obama campaign. But Brzezinski is not waiting for the outcome of the November elections to take over key parts of the US government. Brzezinski and his left CIA allies are already moving to assert their strategy, even as the neocons and their characteristic obsessions are moved to the back burner. The probability of an attack on Iran or Syria is declining, even as the danger of confrontation with Russia, China, and Pakistan -- all much more dangerous targets to trifle with -- increases exponentially.

1. KOSOVO: The independence of Kosovo has opened a new crisis front in Eastern Europe, with the potential for very nasty complications in regard to Russia. This is the essence of the Brzezinski anti-Russian policy. Kosovo independence is of course a flagrant violation of all existing norms of international law, most notably the Helsinki CSCE treaty of 1975 which finally put an end to World War II by declaring that all borders in Europe were to be considered final unless and until any changes had been agreed through mutual consultation of the interested parties. Since the Serbian government in Belgrade is vehemently opposed to Kosovo independence, the unilateral actions of the US, British, and NATO are the very essence of international anarchy. The new regime in Kosovo goes far beyond the usual kleptocracy of NATO puppets favored by Brzezinski and his circles. The new regime in Kosovo is essentially the terrorist KLA, an organization devoted to gun-running, drug-running, and trafficking in human slaves. The KLA is a Balkan version of Al Qaeda, and both are wholly owned creations of the CIA and British intelligence. With Kosovo independence, the US, British, and NATO stand ready to use armed force to defend the right of a terrorist gang to assert sovereignty over a segment of modern Europe. The criminal obscenity of this policy could hardly be greater, but for Brzezinski all methods are legitimate provided that they increase tension with Moscow, and in that respect Kosovo independence is already a glowing success.

2. SPACE WARFARE: The shooting down by the Pentagon of a US satellite over the Pacific is a very provocative military stunt designed to intimidate both Moscow and Beijing, who happened to be Brzezinski's immediate targets. This reckless and irresponsible action has raised the specter of an uncontrolled arms race reaching into outer space.

3. SYRIA: Zbigniew Brzezinski himself, fresh from addressing a retreat of House Democrats in Williamsburg Virginia, is now in Syria at the head of a RAND Corporation delegation. The purpose of this mission should not be construed as peace in the Middle East, although some foolish observers may read it in that way. Brzezinski's goal is immediately to lessen Russian influence in Syria, including the closing of certain naval facilities that the Russian navy has maintained in that country. In the longer run, Brzezinski would like to turn both Syria and Iran into components of the ring he means to forge around Russia for the purpose of the strategic encirclement of that rival superpower. Zbigniew's argument against the neocons is, why attack Iran and Syria, when you can turn them into kamikaze stooges, play them against Russia, and get rid of all of them that way? Europe and China are destined to play similar anti-Russian roles in Brzezinski's playbook.

4. CIA UNILATERAL KILLINGS IN PAKISTAN: Back in July 2007, Obama attracted much unfavorable attention when he announced his plan to bomb targets inside Pakistan without reference to the government of that country. He was vigorously criticized by Bush, McCain, and Mrs. Clinton. Obama turned out to be a bigger warmonger than Bush himself, since the tenant of the White House said that it was absolutely essential to work with the government of Pakistan against terrorism, and not humiliate them unnecessarily. Now it turns out that Obama's puppet master Zbigniew Brzezinski is more powerful than Bush on this issue. The Washington Post of Tuesday, February 19 revealed that a CIA Predator drone aircraft had attacked the Pakistani town of Mir Ali, killing a certain Abu Laith al-Libi, supposedly a leading figure of the al Qaeda patsy organization. The big news was that this time around, the CIA had not sought approval from the government of Pakistan. President Musharraf, weakened by the CIA destabilization of his country that is now ongoing, was only notified of the operation once it was underway, meaning that he was not even consulted in advance. Thus, the aggressive policy put into Obama's mouth by Zbigniew Brzezinski has become operational US policy, regardless of what the lame-duck Bush had to say about this issue last summer. Pakistan is now being targeted because of President Musharraf's strategic understanding with China. Brzezinski intends to strip the Chinese of all their traditional allies as part of his campaign to smash the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and any other foci of resistance inside Eurasia against Anglo-American imperialism.

POLICE STATE MOVES TO ELIMINATE OBAMA'S COMPETITION

The campaign of scandal revelations against Senator John McCain in the New York Times suggest that the banking establishment is determined to remove all obstacles that might impede the March of Brzezinski's puppet Obama to the White House. In addition, Arizona Republican Congressman Rick Renzi, a McCain ally, has just been indicted on charges of extortion, wire fraud and money laundering in an alleged scheme to profit from a land deal. Renzi is an honorary co-chairman of McCain's presidential campaign. This is not the first time that the intelligence community-police state apparatus has had to intervene decisively to provide assistance to the faltering ambitions of their puppet, Obama. During his quest for a seat in the United States Senate from Illinois in 2004, Obama received a scandal boost not once but twice. Obama's opponent in the Illinois Democratic senatorial primary of March 2004 was Marson Blair Hull, a wealthy securities broker who spent $28 million on television advertising and was heavily favored to defeat Obama in that primary. But Hull's campaign was torpedoed by a barrage of well timed media charges that he had abused his former wife. Hull was therefore obliged to drop out of the race.

After Hull had been eliminated, Obama still had to face his Republican opponent in the November general election. Here his adversary was Jack Ryan, an investment banker from Goldman Sachs. Ryan had divorced his wife Jeri in 1999, and the case was sealed at their mutual request. Suddenly the Chicago Tribune and WLS television began undertaking mighty exertions to get these divorce records made public, even though they involved a dispute about child custody. On June 22, 2004, Los Angeles Superior Court judge Robert Schneider released the court documents in question. They revealed an accusation by Jeri Ryan against her husband, now Obama's political competitor, to the effect that Jack Ryan had induced her to frequent sex clubs in a number of locations, and had attempted to coerce her into sexual intercourse in the presence of third parties. Judge Schnider's decision was all the more extraordinary because it was made in the face of the direct opposition by both parties to the divorce, and bore on a Family Court matter that is normally kept vigorously secret. It was as if some totalitarian invisible hand were intervening in favor of the beleaguered Obama candidacy. At this point Jack Ryan was compelled to abandon his candidacy at the urging of Dennis Hastert, then Speaker of the House. By now the Illinois Democratic Party appeared to have gotten the message that Obama enjoyed divine protection, since they did not nominate a serious candidate to oppose him in the November election. Instead, they brought in a carpetbagger and well known windbag in the person of Allan Keyes of Maryland, who predictably went on to lose to Obama by the most lopsided margin in Illinois political history.

With US missiles about to be installed in Poland under the direct supervision of Ian Brzezinski, the Pentagon's top man for Eastern Europe, the world is demonstrably moving towards a US - Russian superpower confrontation with unmistakable thermonuclear overtones. The one missing ingredient in this pattern is a suitable demagogue in the White House who can make an appeal for national mobilization in this crisis, including quite possibly a restoration of the military draft, planeloads of body bags, and a dimension of economic sacrifice and tax increases which Bush never proposed. This is the role of Zbigniew Brzezinski's puppet and Manchurian candidate, Obama. The anointed one can still be prevented from carrying out the Brzezinski-Soros plan to seize the Democratic presidential nomination through the domestic equivalent of a color revolution or people power coup.

The dynasty we need to worry about at this point is neither the Clintons nor the Bushes. The main concern today is an extension of the Brzezinski dynasty. Zbigniew Brzezinski, founder of the Trilateral Commission, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and RAND Corporation operative, personally selected Carter as president of the United States in the mid-1970s. The resulting 1977-1981 Brzezinski Trilateral administration was an unmitigated catastrophe, leading to two decades of severe political reaction from which this country has not recovered. Given the ongoing breakdown crisis of the Anglo-American banking and currency systems, another Brzezinski administration would pose the threat of thermonuclear war with Russia in an infinitely more acute form than in the 1970s. After a few months of Zbigniew Brzezinski running the show, the era of Bush and the neocons might begin to look like the good old days. It is still possible to avoid this nightmare by timely action.

[p.w.rapp]

As I posted here I never had a shadow of doubt, that Obama is part of the plan.
Now knowing, that Brzezinsky is the éminence grise behind Obama, your post connects the dots in an extraordinary way.

WGT is right on the money IMO.

[tumetuestumefais...]

Yes, Obama sucks more than anyone else, as I wrote immediately after the Iowa Caucus victory speech:
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...;st=0&#last
Obama in my oppinion is very dangerous, because he has a charisma the other candidates haven't. And if one even briefly looks what he's advocating it realy induces a fear in me, because he can even more confuse and deteriorate the american people's common sense. I didn't much fear GHWBush, Clinton or GWBush, I just didn't liked them and it was easy to find them out, but Obama he induces a real fear, because he almost confused also me, who studied loads about their tricks, and then just researching of his true background took me quickly back to the reality.
I'm a poor European, might be I'm completely wrong and paranoiac, but what I see: There is even no need for any new 9/11 - they just leave crash dollar (by simply print full ships of it) - then the people would suffer an economic chaos, they'll riot, then they'll disarm them using police and army (all made for the sake of "security", "emergency", and also much BS about "unity" etc. - from mouth of Obama or obamists, media heavily involved with additional propaganda...) then they make the people want (or pretend the people want it - by faked polls) the NAFTA and AMERO... essentially to the end of ABOLITION OF THE US CONSTITUTION...and it would be the end - WHY? Because the US is one of very few places on this Earth where still are some unalienable civil rights and especially right and means to defend them. I was studiying the US Constitutional system quite thoroughly and it in fact completely changed my political oppinion - before I was confused, almost leftist, pacifist - after, when I started to understand why is so important US Constitution and Bill of Rights - by then I'm convinced this are one of the most sophisticated legal documents ever written in history of mankind and its struggle for freedom. If this would be abolished, not just Americans, but whole mankind would leap back to very dark ages.

There is now an old-new president here - he was (just by majority of 2 votes) reelected because of his absolutely suprising speech before the last vote cast (there were 6 rounds) where he very directly bounded himself to the legacy of Abraham Lincoln, conservative republicanism, libertarianism, to the true christian values, national sovereignity, showed harsh skepticism to the UN, EU and Euro or even skepticism to the global warming and neo-liberalism. It looked almost like a kind of "Ron Paul speech". He was also elected, because the real behind-the-scenes struggle where some people exposed to some crucial legislators (who elect here the president) the ties of the rival candidate (an american citizen proposed here by leftists) sent here most probably directly by the CFR, WB and IMF he has very close ties to... unfortunately only few know, what this small victory in the small country means.

Sorry to remind you about, but the Declaration of Independence reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.


This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Feb 27 2008, 09:32 AM

[bill]

I remember thinking at the time that Obama's election to the Senate didn't smell right (I live in Illinois)

bringing in Allan Keys at the end was tantamout to throwing the election ---just didn't make sense at all

Obama just 'came out of nowhere' and all his oponents were knocked out of his way


I have read elsewhere that Brezinski is Obama's 'godfather'

I find Obama scary as well

but hillary is just as bad


http://www.rense.com/general80/spawn.htm

eta

McCain is a madman !

This post has been edited by bill: Feb 27 2008, 09:56 AM

[p.w.rapp]

I have read elsewhere that Brezinski is Obama's 'godfather'

Of course you did!

2 posts above yours.


(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)



Sorry Bill!

[FM258]

JHFC

HRC....McCain...Obama....does it really f*cking matter anymore?

[Sanders]

Cool thread.

Thanx for bringing that to us, painter. I don't doubt Mr. Tarpley's info - not sure about all of the conclusions ... I don't doubt that Zbiggy Bzrezinski wouldn't waste a chance to get in Russia's face, but surely he knows that China is the US' banker? What are we gonna shoot China with if they won't loan us the money for the bullets?

It's all so convoluted and complex ... I wonder sometimes, why so little talk about the Shanghai Co-op Org? I've NEVER heard it mentioned in the mainstream news, only fleetingly read about it ... one of those subjects you have to go searching for to learn about. Definitely a big threat to US hegemony in Asia, I'm sure Mr. Bzrezinski is obsessed with this threat. And sure Mr. Bzrezinski has noted that the US' efforts to gain a foothold in Central Asia has met with utter failure, I point out that the US was thrown out of Uzbekistan outright a few years ago, despite president Bush having welcomed their detainee-boiling president to the White House on one occasion. Apart from Turkey & Georgia's NATO presence, US bases int Afghanistan and a tentative presence in Kajikistan (sp?) the US has gotten nowhere on this front. I'm sure this failure, along with other huge cluster $%$*s and president Bush's record breaking popularity have propped the door open for Mr. Bzrezinski and his POV.

I wonder about this though ... yes, I'm easily convinced that there is a big rift between a so-called Cheney/Bushies/neocon faction and a so-called Rockefeller/Bzezinski (/Obama!?) faction - I thought so from the moment I read about Bzrezinski's speech in front of the Senate re: potential Iran invasion. Where the Clintons fit in to all of this, I don't know. But, whenever I see factions fighting about something, I can't help but imagine that there is some other more powerful faction even further behind the scenes playing those two camps off of each other. I have no evidence of this mind you, my mind just automatically goes there. I won't say who that might be ... but I have an idea, hee-hee. And I gotta guess that Henry Kissinger is in THAT camp - only because I see him swimming with both the Rockefeller/Bzezinskis and the neocons (particularly R. Pearle). But I'm just suppositioning (for what it's worth).

But hey, aren't all these guys, D. Rockefeller, Z. Bzrezinski, H. Kissinger, G. Shultz, R. Cheney, all really really old and decrepid? Why won't they just die off already? (...And who will we have to fear when they do???)

[tumetuestumefais...]

JHFC

HRC....McCain...Obama....does it really f*cking matter anymore?

Of course there is a difference: HRC is just a neurotic cow while McCain and Obama are booth psychopaths (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Feb 28 2008, 09:26 AM

[tumetuestumefais...]

?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM7L4SDGdqU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_MeRDQx0Ys
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5795192287721698174
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0DoxrNCImI

and here I've found in english (just for information - I was already writing here about the Czech president)
Vaclav Klaus on danger of environmentalism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUaX3Mw8qvg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEQmJBINYj4

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Feb 28 2008, 11:44 AM

[Lasthorseman]

Hello, REMAX
I'm looking for a David Koresh style survivalist compound way back up in the woods.

[tumetuestumefais...]

Hello, REMAX
I'm looking for a David Koresh style survivalist compound way back up in the woods.

Probably even that would not help>Ruby Ridge...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9-Ih4H70MM

[jadenter]

Hello, REMAX
I'm looking for a David Koresh style survivalist compound way back up in the woods.

Need a roommate? Have dog will travel... lol.

Jeff