Pete Zalewski, Air Traffic Controller On 9/11 Options

[Carl Bank]

Whatch this video from 14:36 - 17:10

"911 - False Flag" - "Unter falscher Flagge" - documentary German - English Subs - 1:12:58 - 23.03.2009


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=80...IOKi02wL88rmoCg

14:36 - 17:10 ...Pete Zalewski...

Why is he never mentioned in any other doc?

This post has been edited by Carl Bank: Apr 7 2009, 02:56 PM

[Carl Bank]

The complete NBC interview with Pete and many other 9/11 ATCs. Aired 9/11/02

The Air Traffic Controllers of 9/11:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5373490407014986726

Thanks for that link, gid!

WTF are these guys talking about?
Although, they report precisely every minute,
they anly talk about lost radio contact and lost transmitter signals
and how they turned over the plane to another controller, about thinking
what this could mean, about the highjacker's "mistakes" of transmitting
radio to the control center instead of into the cabin and switching on UA175's
transponder briefly... and so on. -
But not a word, not even the mentioning of the idea, of contacting NORAD
in the first 4o minutes or so of the obvious highjacking. Not a word.

And the moderator of the show doesn't even try to implicate that
this should be a standart procedere.



not very astonished: Carl

[airshow]

"But not a word, not even the mentioning of the idea, of contacting NORAD
in the first 4o minutes or so of the obvious highjacking. Not a word."


Wow there's a lot information and reference's on this site and I will try to work through it. As for the above, let me say that as a former centre and tower controller, the interview seems normal. there have been times where ATC news interviews deal with limited information. Don't even give them more information to confuse them. It is fairly common for the media to screw up anything to do with aviation. Tell them the aircraft was a small piper and it turns out to be a small commuter a/c in the media. Also when doing an interview, the things that are normal to you, you might not mentioned because they are not out of routine. I won't assume what the US controller is mandated to do, but I would place bets that as soon as an a/c is 'deemed' to be in an emergency situation, the floor supervisor is immediately called. In order to call NORAD, a determination has to be made that the a/c will penetrate a defence 'Identification zone' or that in fact it has been hijacked. So because the interview with the controller does not mention this, does not mean that he didn't report his concerns to a supervisor. What the manager does with it is never questioned. If I were a supervisor and a qualified controller tells me he thinks the flight has been hijacked, I would back him up 100%. The worse is that a colonel or a reservist gets his monthly quota of flight time.

There are reports that Indy did not have knowledge that the first tower had already been hit. Officially that might be correct, but I have never visited a control unit where the lunchroom TV wasn't onto some news channel. It is hard to fathom that someone wouldn't call the floor from the lunchroom with this type of breaking news. Especially because it involves aviation. I would guess that after the first tower was hit, almost every control unit in America had this knowledge.

Hope I responded in the right spot. I hope to add to this site and it might be a few weeks before I feel comfortable with the procedures.