IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I., To Identify 9/11 Plane Wreckage

Alan Miller
post Mar 17 2008, 12:57 PM
Post #1





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 18-July 07
Member No.: 1,477



Astonishing, but perhaps to be expected.

F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I. To Formally Identify 9/11 Plane Wreckage
http://www.911blogger.com/node/14406
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Mar 17 2008, 12:59 PM
Post #2


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



Thanks, Alan. Great work!

I'd already taken the liberty of copying/pasting the article into the 9/11 Blogger RSS thread that I moved into the Flight 77 Forum:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....c=11403&hl=
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan Miller
post Mar 17 2008, 01:18 PM
Post #3





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 18-July 07
Member No.: 1,477



Just to clarify -- Aidan Monaghan gets the credit for this. I had no involvement. I only posted the article link here in the forum.

QUOTE (painter @ Mar 15 2008, 03:59 PM) *
Thanks, Alan. Great work!

I'd already taken the liberty of copying/pasting the article into the 9/11 Blogger RSS thread that I moved into the Flight 77 Forum:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....c=11403&hl=
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Mar 17 2008, 01:34 PM
Post #4


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Alan Miller @ Mar 17 2008, 09:18 AM) *
Just to clarify -- Aidan Monaghan gets the credit for this. I had no involvement. I only posted the article link here in the forum.


Right! You're worthy of considerable recognition for your work, however! wink.gif

cheers.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Mar 17 2008, 05:32 PM
Post #5





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,910
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Consistent with the theory that the official theory is bogus.

I wonder what those parts are inside Iron Mountain? Probably parts from aircraft OTHER THAN the ones claimed to be involved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
p.w.rapp
post Mar 18 2008, 01:36 AM
Post #6





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,743
Joined: 19-October 06
From: European Protectorate
Member No.: 110



Very interesting read, Alan!

A case record like that is 'required reading' for every US attorney, lawyer and law student!!!

The fraud is so obvious as if the words COVER-UP were printed in bold from bottom left to top right on the court file.

Is US-Justice blind?



@amazed
QUOTE
I wonder what those parts are inside Iron Mountain? Probably parts from aircraft OTHER THAN the ones claimed to be involved.

my 2 Euro-cents added...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd August 2014 - 11:20 AM