The Malthusian Conspiracy?, The Possible Big Picture Options

[Timothy Osman]

Yup, that's the way I see it, too.
The psychopaths want to bring us into a new,
more easily manageable,
form of enslavement,
and they have to knock down
some of their older constructs,
to accomplish this.

The scary part is we're entering a phase in which things will be run a little bit more sophisticatedly, the blunt instrument of the neo-conservatives have played their role of evil imperialists to a tee and attracted millions to anything anti Bushco.
In reality they just had the prearranged prang with Cadillac, the all white coke heads driving have put the black kid behind the wheel and they're off to South America.
Now Obama is left with a clapped out banged up old thing with It's full purchase price still owing. While the passengers, the US citizenry are busy with their new austerity measures imposed by the new driver of the Cadillac which of course will include the emissions of the car itself all hell will break loose with western intel run terror cells causing havoc throughout the regions they wish to destabilize for future religion free democratization. IMO.

Conclusion



Ultimately, the aims of the Mumbai attacks are to target Pakistan for balkanization. The question of who is responsible – either the ISI, largely rogue of Pakistan’s civilian government and under the authority of Anglo-American intelligence; or separate Indian terrorists, likely supported by the same Anglo-American intelligence community – while important, is ultimately a secondary consideration in comparison to the question of Why?

The Who, What, Where, and When is a show for public consumption; masked in confusion and half-truths, designed to confuse and ultimately frustrate the observer – creating a sense of unease and fear of the unknown. The WHY, on the other hand, is the most important question; once you discover the why, the who, where, what, and when begin to fall into place, and create a full picture.



If the Mumbai attacks were designed to be blamed on Pakistan – as they likely were – and thus, to possibly start a war between Pakistan and India – which is now a growing reality – what is the ultimate significance of knowing if it was the ISI or Indian elements responsible? Albeit, this is important to know, however, when it comes to understanding the motives behind the attacks, it pales in comparison.



Pakistan is a strategic lynch-point in the region. Pakistan borders Iran, Afghanistan, India and China. It lies directly below the Central Asian republics of the Former Soviet Union, which are rich in natural gas resources. With NATO’s war in Afghanistan, and the Anglo-Americans in Iraq, and American forces in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, the occupation of Pakistan would position Western imperial militaries around Iran, the central Middle Eastern target. With the balkanization of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, destabilizing forces would cross the borders into Iran, ultimately creating the conditions for political and social collapse within the country.



A conflict between Pakistan and India would not only have the effect of dismantling Pakistan, but would also greatly deter India’s rapid economic and social development as the world’s largest democracy, and would force it to come under the influence or “protection” of Western military might and International Financial Institutions. The same is likely for China, as destabilization would cross Pakistan’s borders into the most populated country on earth, exacerbating ethnic differences and social disparities.



A large Anglo-American military presence in Pakistan, or, alternatively, a NATO or UN force, combined with the already present NATO force in Afghanistan, would be a massive military strategic position against advancement of China, Russia or India into the region. With China’s massively increasing influence in Africa threatening Anglo-American and European domination of the continent, a massive military presence on the border of China could act as a powerful warning.



The Mumbai attacks do not aid India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, or any nation within the region. The beneficiaries of the Mumbai Massacre are in London and New York, in the boardrooms and shareholders of the largest international banks; which seek total control of the world. Having dominated North America and Europe for much of recent history, these bankers, primarily Anglo-American, but also European, seek to exert their total control over the world’s resources, currencies, and populations. There are many concurrent strategies they are employing to achieve this end: among them, the global financial crisis, to reign in and control the world economy; and a “total war” in the Middle East, likely escalating into a World War with Russia and China, is the perfect tool to strike enough fear into the world population to accept an over-arching supranational governance structure – to ensure no future wars occur, to ensure stability of the global economy – a utopian vision of a single world order.



The problem with utopias is that they are “ultimate ideals,” and if humanity has learned anything in its history on this planet; it is that perfection is impossible, be it in the form of an “ideal person” or an “ideal government;” humanity is plagued by imperfections and emotion. Accepting our imperfections as a species is what can make us great, and understanding that a utopian ideal is impossible to achieve is what can allow us to create the “best possible” society we can have. All utopias attempted throughout history have always turned into dystopias. We must learn from humanity’s history of sordid flaws; and only when we accept that we are not perfect, and cannot ever become perfect, in person or in politics, are we free to become humanity at it’s most advanced and at its most noble.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...a&aid=11313

[Timothy Osman]

Kissinger Spells out how the NWO will be created from the edge of the Abyss.





I once had the misfortune of working for a corporation who had to downsize their operation, in order to persuade the employee's to either leave voluntarily or accept the new conditions it was decided by management to put in place a work environment where every employee should expect to be dismissed on a daily basis. In other words if you make things shitty enough anything looks better. The managers exact words to me were that I should come to work expecting to be sacked.



edited to add, pinched from JFK's post at LC and used to demonstrate my new skillz at embedding

This post has been edited by Timothy Osman: Dec 23 2008, 06:56 AM

[lunk]

Kissinger (born Heinz Alfred Kissinger on May 27, 1923)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger#Quotes

He sure looks healthy and seems very mentally active,
for his advanced age of 85!

imo, lunk

[Timothy Osman]

He sure looks healthy and seems very mentally active,
for his advanced age of 85!

Hmm, to me he looks like a cross between an elderly Millhouse and a young Jabba the Hut. Probably because he has the body of Millhouse and the total lack of conscience of Jabba. Again with the Star Wars.

[Timothy Osman]

Word of the day

Demography

Demography is the statistical study of all populations. It can be a very general science that can be applied to any kind of dynamic population, that is, one that changes over time or space (see population dynamics). It encompasses the study of the size, structure and distribution of populations, and spatial and/or temporal changes in them in response to birth, migration, aging and death.

(IMG:http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i295/sedman/800px-Muslim_distribution.png)

[Timothy Osman]

Bretton Woods 2.0 and the taxation on carbon content

The international financial system is broken. An integrated set of reforms will be needed to achieve sustained economic growth and shared prosperity. The G8 leaders of Europe, Japan and the US have agreed on an emergency summit this autumn in New York to revamp the international system - a good idea, provided it initiates a wide-ranging set of changes rather than being a one-off meeting focused on market regulation.

The G8 leaders are keen to start on regulation and that is understandable. Wall Street, the City of London and other financial centres ran wild with undercapitalised borrowing and lending stoked by over-the-top fees and bonuses. Alan Greenspan's Federal Reserve fed the financial bubble with rock-bottom interest rates and regulatory forbearance, when it had the chance to restrain it. And the derivatives market was allowed to become so vast and unwieldy that there is no clarity as to who owes what to whom in tens of trillions of dollars of credit default swaps and other derivatives.

Risk assessments have been made enterprise by enterprise without consideration of systemic risk. When institutions are "too big to fail", they must be closely supervised so that indeed they don't bring the entire system down when they do, from time to time, fail. And we have learned again that there is no global lender of last resort, only a hodgepodge of individual central banks and treasuries, whose individual actions may be sufficient or not to stem a panic.

The G8 leaders must go well beyond the issues of financial regulation, however. Even before the current crisis, the global economic system was failing in crucial ways. Many poor countries remain cut off from global prosperity, often falling into poverty-induced violence and conflict. These will be still harder hit by the downturn. The global environmental crisis was also worsening, and climate shocks were wreaking havoc with world food supplies. Energy systems were in turmoil as the growing world economy pushed against supply constraints, yet there was no consensus on how to create an energy system compatible with the environmental and economic needs of the planet. These challenges are in desperate need of attention not only on their own merits, but also because global economic growth cannot be sustained without solutions to these crises.

Financial assistance to the poorest countries - a lifeline for more than a billion people - is in tatters. Europe and the US have mobilised around $3 trillion in the past month in guarantees and bail-out funds for the banks but failed to mobilise even one ten-thousandth of that this year to help the world's poorest grow more food in the midst of a massive food-price increase and hunger crisis.

The US has been blind to the millennium development goals (MDGs) on fighting poverty, hunger, and disease. When George Bush addressed the UN in September - supposedly the mid-point in achieving the goals - he mentioned "terror" 31 times while failing to mention the goals even once. All the big donors except Britain - including the US, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Canada - are failing to live up to long-standing aid commitments.

The leaders should pause to reflect that there is another little-mentioned international summit scheduled for December in Doha, Qatar, to take up the challenge of financing development. It comes six years after a similar summit in Mexico, at which countries pledged "concrete efforts" to achieve 0.7% of GNP in development assistance - a level of aid none of them have yet fulfilled.

A true Bretton Woods II summit would set a financial framework to achieve urgent global goals in macroeconomic stability, economic development, environmental sustainability and trade for development. All these are vital for long-term sustainable growth, but global goals in all four areas remain unachieved. Summiteers should come with chequebooks and international commitments in hand.

Here, then, is an agenda for Bretton Woods II. First, we need to restructure global finance, based on an expanded system of capital adequacy standards, financial reporting, system-wide risk management, and new lender-of-last-resort capacities. Derivatives traders, hedge funds, and broker dealers would be brought under regulatory control. The IMF would be empowered to be a true global lender of last resort (as I urged a dozen years ago, warning of the threat of self-fulfilling panics). To make this possible, a small tax on financial transactions - a Tobin tax - would be implemented to expand the IMF's war chest in case of crisis and to fund other urgent international needs.

Second, the new global financial structure should help to rescue the world from human-induced climate change. A straightforward tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels, levied by all countries, would do the job, and much better than the enormously cumbersome emission-trading system concocted and championed by the same financial engineers who brought us our current banking crisis. Most of the carbon-tax revenues would stay at home in each country, to help finance low-emission technologies. Some would be directed to finance three global public goods: research and development on sustainable energy; transfer of sustainable-energy technology to low-income countries; and climate-change adaptation.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/20...lobaleconomy-g8

It's a done deal with the signatures of the stooges supposedly representing us the only requirement left. The actual working plans were drafted years ago. IMO.

[Timothy Osman]

Former Australian Prime Minister and "worlds best treasurer" Paul Bearer or Keating if you prefer lays out his vision on Bretton Woods 2.0 and the reasons behind the collapse we had to have.
This man is the globalists globalist, he is silky smooth and his arguments are always persuasive. This is an oscar winning performance from him in these video's because you must remember one thing when watching his delivery about the creation of a new finacial order. That is that there will be no Suplus nations, that whatever surplus the Indian and Chinese economy's might have run in the past is being wiped out. That even if you're Chinese it's impossible to bank wages you're not earning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaiHknko6dM



part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJiOZIdJOeA

part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MixVLZeVz7c

This post has been edited by Timothy Osman: Feb 5 2009, 08:01 PM

[Timothy Osman]

The Men Behind Hitler, a German warning to the world by Bernhard Schreiber.

http://www.toolan.com/hitler/index.html

pdf file

http://www.mediafire.com/?glc01yh3zym

I haven't read it all yet but it's about the usual suspects and so belongs here.