What Hit The Pentagon? Nothing., Listened to this yesterday |

![]() ![]() |
May 14 2008, 03:09 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
This makes Norman Minetta's testimony ("the plane is 10 miles out, do the orders still stand....."blah, blah) a blatant piece of disinfo. No wonder he looked so nervous. .... What do you think? Hi ogrady, IMO the plane(s) could well have been 50, 30, 10 miles out on FAA and/or USAF radar and still flown over, or altered course to miss the wall, or have been spoofed "blips", or ?? I'm not ready to call disinfo on Norman Mineta's testimony just yet (was that under oath for a Congressional Committee?). He might have looked nervous because he knew it was "career suicide" to say so [or maybe he feared a Chenian DC "suicide" like recently made news (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif) ]. |
|
|
|
May 14 2008, 12:54 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
QUOTE (ogrady) I've been thinking. I saw a website (unfortunately, can't remember the name or location at the moment - I'll have to search) which showed how the holes created in the Pentagon's rings were identical to charges used by the military to make holes in buildings through which they could launch attacks. (I'll get back on this when I find it.) I now really believe that nothing hit the Pentagon. There was an explosion/bomb. This makes Norman Minetta's testimony ("the plane is 10 miles out, do the orders still stand....."blah, blah) a blatant piece of disinfo. No wonder he looked so nervous. Also, the much viewed 5 frames of video, meant to suggest (no doubt) a missile, and the many 'accidental' missile mistakes (most notably, Rumsfeld's) that we viewed in the press. More disinfo to distract us. If April is correct, the frame of an object entering the field of vision must have been a CGI. What do you think? We did a thread on the Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kit based on some pretty good research by Russell Pickering over at LC forum here. (IMG:http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x180/T-Guide/exit_hole3.jpg) Rapid Wall Breaching Kit Hole breach is centered between columns - Bricks are blown to right of alleged aircraft angle of flight path (IMG:http://www.mindswell.org/pentag1.jpg) (IMG:http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/allhands/nov01/war18sm.jpg) The No Parking sign survived the impact of a fuselage nose cone or landing gear or jet engine allegedly impacting the entire interior wall, while a Rapid Wall Breaching Kit would only exert force on the portion of the wall targeted leaving the No Parking sign un-touched (IMG:http://www.serendipity.li/wot/exit2.jpg) |
|
|
|
May 14 2008, 04:20 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Hole breach is centered between columns - Bricks are blown to right of alleged aircraft angle of flight path Exactly. As an aside, an HE warhead denonation could also cause the bricks to migrate outside the wall. Hydrostatic shock "waves" in terminal ballistics are a notable exception in fluid-filled objects (I've got a really cool picture of a rifle bullet "exploding" an apple that is inconsistent with the above). QUOTE The No Parking sign survived the impact of a fuselage nose cone or landing gear or jet engine allegedly impacting the entire interior wall, while a Rapid Wall Breaching Kit would only exert force on the portion of the wall targeted leaving the No Parking sign un-touched. Again, exactly as any "good little" [focused blast wave] shaped charge would be expected to do. Why again haven't we seen any photos of the "holes" in 3 of 4 brick walls that should be in the outer two rings in order to reach the wall shown in SPreston's excellent photos above?? EDIT: In the photo with the "respirator guy" note the broken windows on the floor above. SPreston, have you got a high-res version of this one handy? The upper panes are broken only on the upper left of 3 second story windows visible. Going off memory [Please DO NOT quote me here as my references are elsewhere, and I'm not certain I should list them anyway in the interests of public safety- I can actually understand a "need to know" when it comes to HE], high explosive pressure waves decrease approximately with 1/distance^3. To me this indicates an overpressure detonation "wave" that was higher pressure near the 2nd story floor than near the 2nd story ceiling, especially above/left of the "impact" hole. In laymans terms: based on the observed damage in these photos above, IMHO an explosive device or devices was/were inside the First Floor C-ring, with blast center a little left of the hole's center, but stairwells, furniture placement, or floor "venting" could explain some of this "offset." Of course I'm not Gene Corley, FEMA, or ASCE (strangely, they were at WTC, the Pentagon, and OKC, you know). This post has been edited by dMole: Feb 27 2009, 05:09 PM |
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 12:43 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
QUOTE (dMole) EDIT: In the photo with the "respirator guy" note the broken windows on the floor above. SPreston, have you got a high-res version of this one handy? (IMG:http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/punchoutwheel2.jpg) No, sorry I do not. However this photo might be of some help here or this photo here or here or here |
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 04:57 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Thank you immensely SPreston, and I found what I was looking for there- unfortunately-- I've "smoked" too many guns today for my comfort...
HINTS: AEDrive1.jpeg, AEDrive2.jpeg Does anyone have labeled versions of the above [or similar] photos? [C ring-inner, C ring-outer, B-ring inner, etc.] Those MSM/DC dogs just don' hunt... |
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 11:08 AM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
Thank you immensely SPreston, and I found what I was looking for there- unfortunately-- I've "smoked" too many guns today for my comfort... HINTS: AEDrive1.jpeg, AEDrive2.jpeg Does anyone have labeled versions of the above [or similar] photos? [C ring-inner, C ring-outer, B-ring inner, etc.] Those MSM/DC dogs just don' hunt... (IMG:http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/victims/docs/pentagon_victims.jpg) (IMG:http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h279/hatenames/pent3rdfloorvictim1.jpg) (IMG:http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h279/hatenames/pent3rdfloorvictim2.jpg) (IMG:http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h279/hatenames/pent3rdfloorvictim3.jpg) Sorry to get a little off subject, but exactly how could the DNA of this alleged Flight 77 passenger officially get into the open area between D-Ring and C-Ring on the 3rd floor? In the photo below, there appears to be no breach in the 3rd floor and no visible damage of any sort in that area. The windows appear unbroken. ( here and here and here ) There is a short length of a white something near that location. How would her DNA survive the alleged firestorm and claimed fuel/air explosions inside the 1st floor and somehow move through two solid concrete floors to arrive on the 3rd floor in this open area? Proof of faked DNA sampling? Don't forget that her DNA would have been originally as alleged, inside the sealed fuselage of an aircraft, with no massive objects inside the fuselage with her to carry DNA tissue through to the A&E Drive nor to the 3rd floor. The massive engines would have been out on the wings and the massive landing gear would have been below the fuselage and below the alleged passengers. The fuel would be below the fuselage and inside the wings, if one was foolish enough to believe that an aircraft actually hit the Pentagon. (IMG:http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/17.jpg) This post has been edited by SPreston: May 15 2008, 11:26 AM |
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:24 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
I went looking for a Pentagon map in the pinned sections and didn't find it.
http://www.hqda.army.mil/aoguide/Pentagon_Map.htm PDF [with strange "anti-North" rotation] http://www.dtic.mil/ref/html/Welcome/PDFs/Pent.pdf Pentagon dimension info [height 77 ft 3.5 in/24m, wall length 921 ft/281m]: http://renovation.pentagon.mil/history-features.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pentagon These links above probably should be pinned somewhere close for reference. ----- SPreston's photos and DNA question above set me to thinking. OK, it's too late to edit my earlier post, but the 3 of 4 walls that I was referring to are in the D and E (outermost two) rings, with "OPEN AREAS" that I'll call "Open Area CD" and "Open Area DE" in the "flight" path as I understand the Pentagon map(s). I'll predict that the "debunkers" will claim that AA77 flew through these "OPEN AREAS" and that's why you don't find evidence of holes in D-inner, D-outer, and [pre-collapse] E-inner walls. If you search carefully, you can find a pre-collapse picture of that [16 ft?] hole in the [lower 2? floors of the] E-outer (Western perimeter) wall. It might be time to get a scale analysis of those Pentagon window sizes soon. Problem for "debunkers": those are load bearing brick walls- just because you don't see the brick walls in the roofed-over? 2 story "open areas" in the photos above does NOT mean that there were not brick walls there. What else would hold up the 3rd, 4th, and 5th floor brick walls that we can see as rows of windows in SPreston's [more recent excellent] photos. Now is that C-outer? hole right of the No Parking sign bigger or smaller than the pre-collapse E-outer hole? Why didn't the D-ring or the "open areas" collapse if the D-ring had 2 "punch holes" similar to those in the collapsed E-ring? I don't have [non-speculative] answers here, but neither does the OCT. The C-ring is a poor location to take the "hole evidence" photo IMHO. The DoD/US Navy captured a little more in those "evidence" photos than they intended, I believe... I do not believe that a wall breaching charge was the only thing used in the C and E ring damage/destruction, based upon the photos above. Knowing how brick/mortar buildings react to "seismic" events is also helpful while looking at the broken windows in the C-ring photo. I'm pretty new to the Pentagon investigations- who is our resident researcher on Pentagon "bomb" eyewitnesses, and how many of them are there? On the white object seen in "Open Area CD" in SPreston's DNA question that looks to be about "window"-length- I'll guess it is a piece of roof "flashing" (commonly either galvanized steel or aluminum) glinting in the sun, and that it was loosened by whatever caused the E-ring collapse. Maybe not. Good work men. [And women of P4911T too- it's an old inside joke- no sexism intended] This post has been edited by dMole: May 15 2008, 05:30 PM |
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 01:16 AM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
1st and 2nd floors open with columns supporting overhead floor slab
(IMG:http://bp3.blogger.com/_PcI9awojNLQ/Rw23ndNXF0I/AAAAAAAAA1s/-5JPmJyHmuo/s400/x_asce_033.jpg) (IMG:http://renovation.pentagon.mil/IMAGES/W1barebones-half.jpg) As I understand the building structure, there are no walls in the 1st story area between the alleged entry hole in E-Ring outer and alleged Exit Hole in C-Ring inner. There are only columns supporting the floor slab of the story above. As you can see in the photo, there are five stories in the A&E drive ( C-B ) and only three stories in the openings ( D-C and E-D ). There is a concrete floor slab between the 1st and 2nd stories and the 2nd and 3rd stories. In the opening where that shiny piece of roof flashing is laying and allegedly the DNA of Norma Lang Steuerle was found, that is the 3rd story floor slab. In the diagram above, the 2nd story floor slab was displaced in one area by an explosion. I have not read anywhere that the 3rd story floor slab was displaced or penetrated. So how did her DNA get on top of the 3rd story floor slab since it was supposedly sealed inside the fuselage as it burrowed through the alleged entry hole at 535 mph? Most of the passenger DNA was allegedly found out near the A&E Drive Exit Hole in the 1st floor area. So apparently the sealed fuselage containing the passenger bodies allegedly made it inside the 1st floor area. Of course since the aircraft has been proven above the Navy Annex, there is no chance of the aircraft returning to the official flight path and entering the Pentagon along the official damage path. The circle contained most of the passenger remains, which indicates the fuselage allegedly made it to C-ring — intact! (IMG:http://911exposed.org/ASCE%20remains2.jpg) Alleged DNA locations (IMG:http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g171/boloboffin2/911/Pentagonfatalities-full.jpg) (IMG:http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/17.jpg) |
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 02:02 AM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Thank you for the "Open Area" correction SPreston,
Have you got any specifics on these "Open Area" support columns then [dimensions, materials, spacing, etc.]? I've looked closer at the Towers [as they were pretty damned impressive engineering in their own right and there was much more "evidence" on WTC2] and the aircraft. Thanks all for being parts of a great team. It is a both a challenge and a pleasure to be among such fine individuals. d |
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 03:07 AM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Patriotic American Group: Valued Member Posts: 518 Joined: 14-May 07 From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY Member No.: 1,045 |
Thank you for the "Open Area" correction SPreston, Have you got any specifics on these "Open Area" support columns then [dimensions, materials, spacing, etc.]? I've looked closer at the Towers [as they were pretty damned impressive engineering in their own right and there was much more "evidence" on WTC2] and the aircraft. Thanks all for being parts of a great team. It is a both a challenge and a pleasure to be among such fine individuals. d You are quite welcome d. No I do not, but I will include a few links below which might help. We enjoy and appreciate your fine input also. SP I did find this, but the accuracy may be incorrect. QUOTE Relevant dimensions of Pentagon (Infoplease, 2003) height of building: 23.6 m (77′ 3″) inter-window distance: 3.1 m (10′ 2″) (derived) inter-column distance: 3.1 m (10′ 2″) (derived) This is an official diagram of the 1st floor from the Pentagon book. here 1st floor Pentagon diagram here (IMG:http://911files.info/77/pentagon_911_book/roof_damage.jpg) Pentagon book photos here Arrogant Deception - Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up? THE PENTAGON BUILDING PERFORMANCE REPORT pages 5-9 This post has been edited by SPreston: May 16 2008, 03:15 AM |
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 03:23 AM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 744 Joined: 25-April 08 From: Canada Member No.: 3,225 |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 04:16 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Thanks Rico and SP.
One not-so important question- WHY_TF? are so many Pentagon maps and diagrams oriented with North anywhere but "up?" I don't think that the magnetic declination is anywhere near 70-130 degrees clockwise in DC... I know it is one politically-screwed-up place but jeebus... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) We really need to gather all these "Pentagram" reference links together somewhere really close and pin that bad boy, no? [or did I miss it?] EDIT: SP- my other links above gave a height of 77 feet 3.5 inches so your source at 77' 3" height is probably "close enough" on those windows. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) EDIT2: References collected at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13365 This post has been edited by dMole: Sep 27 2008, 07:43 PM |
|
|
|
Aug 17 2008, 11:51 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Watch from about 05:45-06:00 onward in this Mythbusters video clip. This is purportedly a shaped C4 (mainly RDX) charge breaching a cinder block wall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_XdOmShVhI Does that bright orange HE blast look familiar to anyone? (IMG:http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h279/hatenames/pentagonvideojudicialwatchpt1_0002.jpg) EDIT: A C4 shaped charge applied to 1.5" steel plate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LudNqf56AFo More on C4 (~91% RDX) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-4_(explosive) http://science.howstuffworks.com/c-4.htm/printable
Reason for edit: Added west Pentagon photo
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2008, 07:23 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 2,170 Joined: 29-September 07 From: Hampshire, UK. Member No.: 2,274 |
This is something I, and many around here, have appreciated for some time. It is my firm belief that there were numerous shaped charges deployed that day the shapes of which could have been rather more complex than a pipe with a copper cone inserted. It would be easy to deploy such devices under cover of building maintenance and upgrades with those whose places of work these building were being totally oblivious to the true nature of the work. Thus months, even years, of preparation could be clandestinely carried out. This destroys one of the BIG arguments of those who support the OCT. Another fact that counters much OCT preacher BS is that the explosive used is 'insensitive to impact' so you could hit a building prep'd with this stuff with a truck, or an aircraft, and it will not detonate until programmed to do so. Note that a very small charge of P4/C4 used in this way could cut through about 6 inches of steel. |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2008, 09:50 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
I was just recovering some spreadsheet results from a computer crash and noticed something on the Auxiliary Power Unit that would be related to any alleged "data gaps" in the SSFDR.
At 09:37:44 EDT, the APU BATT showed 27.6 VDC, with APU BATT ranging from [27.5-27.6 VDC] for the entire flight, with an average voltage of 27.57470 V with SD=0.04349 VDC. Also the APU Load ranged from 1.8 to 2% for the entire flight. These numbers were all from the "AA77_tabular.csv" file decoded from the "raw" file provided by NTSB (see pinned threads in AA77 and Pentagon sections for more information here). ------ The largest accelerometer values that I found so far were at 09:37:42.375 [extrapolated assuming 8 Hz vertical acceleration sampling rate], where a_lon = 0.177 g, a_vert = 1.753 g, and a_lat = -0.081 g |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:49 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Exactly. If this were a "penetration impact" caused by a hypothetical radome [ or nosecone, unless it was a military craft] , or a nose wheel, or [apparently a single-WTF?] turbofan core, or what have you, shouldn't the bricks be INSIDE the C-ring? Watch your local news for one of those "car hits house" bits and look at the debris field (it's called the Law of Conservation of Momentum if anyone is interested). As an aside, an HE warhead detonation could also cause the bricks to migrate outside the wall. ... Of course I'm not Gene Corley, FEMA, or ASCE (strangely, they were at WTC, the Pentagon, and OKC, you know). Courtesy of one of the "prominent" Randiite "debunkers:" (IMG:http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/6853/carbrickwallnz4.th.jpg) (IMG:http://img292.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif) (IMG:http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7478/carbrickwall2oq0.th.jpg) (IMG:http://img152.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif) Also, I recently read that Gene Corley was part of the Waco, TX FBI/BATF/Delta Force Davidian "cleanup." [cough * cough * Corley's resume * cough] http://www.ctlgroup.com/files/dynamic_resu...RRES%200131.pdf |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 04:37 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 2,170 Joined: 29-September 07 From: Hampshire, UK. Member No.: 2,274 |
Also, I recently read that Gene Corley was part of the Waco, TX FBI/BATF/Delta Force Davidian "cleanup." [cough * cough * Corley's resume * cough] And lest we forget, Corley was also involved in the Murrah building cover up: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/W.-Gene-Corley |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2008, 02:20 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Would anyone like to post wall-LABELED, directional photos for the Pentagon, this many years later? EDIT: Here are some Pentagon "damage path" resources: http://www.kolumbus.fi/sy-k/pentagon/asce_en.htm DoD Press Release http://cryptome.sabotage.org/dod091501.htm Official DoD website with photos and PowerPoint presentation: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/briefingsl...fingslideid=129 http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/bri...70C-003.jpg.JPG (IMG: |