IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9/11 News Footage From The Very Morning - Mostly Unseen

Carl Bank
post May 15 2008, 09:01 AM
Post #1





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



Posts this yesterday in the Multimedia forum but looked at it again now more closely:

The BBC again: In the BBC footage from the morning there are several things very
remakable. First you see the well nown footage from the smoking north tower
and while some eye witness is telling via phone what he saw, we see footage of
UA 175 and the impact, but the reporter doesn't seem to even notice that tower
two has been hit. It takes about 8 minutes (though we all have seen it) until someone
mentiones that the second tower is on fire, assuming that the plane went through
the first tower and then debris damaged the 2nd tower.
Second, the eye witnesses report about several huge explosions and about
explosions in the basement as well. Although this BBC flick fuels the NPT as well the
evidence for bombs at the buildings, I haven't seen them in any 9/11 documentary.

Check them all out and maybe someone can find a way to download them all.

Klick on the picture to get access to all ABC, BBC, CBS, NBC, FOX News footage
from the morning of 9/11/01

(IMG:http://belowgroundsurface.org/belowgroundsurface/images/living911-2.png)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ricochet
post May 15 2008, 12:39 PM
Post #2





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 744
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



Here is a complete archive for the day.
http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WetBlanket
post May 17 2008, 03:33 AM
Post #3





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 64
Joined: 29-October 07
Member No.: 2,415



I wouldn't rule out the "No Planes theory". Is there any hard evidence of 757's or 767's crashing at any site that day? The eyewitness reports are sketchy at best. Did those people see a plane... or the building blew up and they were told it was a plane? The videos show signs of fakery.


I'm sure it's part of the plan to divide skeptics and make every alternative scenario seem questionable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voltaire
post May 17 2008, 09:22 AM
Post #4





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 30
Joined: 24-October 06
Member No.: 163



QUOTE (WetBlanket @ May 17 2008, 07:33 AM) *
I wouldn't rule out the "No Planes theory". Is there any hard evidence of 757's or 767's crashing at any site that day? The eyewitness reports are sketchy at best. Did those people see a plane... or the building blew up and they were told it was a plane? The videos show signs of fakery.


I'm sure it's part of the plan to divide skeptics and make every alternative scenario seem questionable.

I completely agree with you. The first objective of the "insiders" is to divide the truthers by spreading much conflicting informations, especially on the pentagon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WetBlanket
post May 17 2008, 09:15 PM
Post #5





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 64
Joined: 29-October 07
Member No.: 2,415



I've looked at pretty much every "conspiracy theory" site and what it seems to me is there are groups that admantly oppose various aspects (like "crazy" no plane theories) when the proof they offer is not reliable.

For instance that engine found on the Manhattan street.

Did anybody see it land there? Where's their report? Was it covered in a tarp overnight and the tarp pulled off while attention was diverted? Is there proof it wasn't there before the WTC "incident"? After all it was sitting UNDER scaffolding! Was it hot? I generally don't touch jet engines that have been recently running full throttle but i'd think a curious onlooker would be like "Golly....OW!" Supposedly it's a 737 engine. Has it's number been traced?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Leslie Landry
post May 18 2008, 10:41 PM
Post #6





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 1,107
Joined: 2-May 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,264



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ May 15 2008, 09:01 AM) *
Posts this yesterday in the Multimedia forum but looked at it again now more closely:

The BBC again: In the BBC footage from the morning there are several things very
remakable. First you see the well nown footage from the smoking north tower
and while some eye witness is telling via phone what he saw, we see footage of
UA 175 and the impact, but the reporter doesn't seem to even notice that tower
two has been hit. It takes about 8 minutes (though we all have seen it) until someone
mentiones that the second tower is on fire, assuming that the plane went through
the first tower and then debris damaged the 2nd tower.
Second, the eye witnesses report about several huge explosions and about
explosions in the basement as well. Although this BBC flick fuels the NPT as well the
evidence for bombs at the buildings, I haven't seen them in any 9/11 documentary.

Check them all out and maybe someone can find a way to download them all.

Klick on the picture to get access to all ABC, BBC, CBS, NBC, FOX News footage
from the morning of 9/11/01

(IMG:http://belowgroundsurface.org/belowgroundsurface/images/living911-2.png)



To Download these videos, You can Download "RealPlayer". with this, any video you watch, it gives you the option to download the video when you put the curser on the video itself.

In the first video that they have in this website, you can see the plane coming in at an angle that i have never seen before...the time that it shows the plane at 31:40 sec.

I would also like to say that i dont believe that it was anything other then a plane that hit these two towers. How it happend or who it was on that note is a different story.

Thanks Carl for showing this!

This post has been edited by Leslie Landry: May 18 2008, 10:45 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 03:35 PM