OGCT True Believers Bullshit Excuses, Need help to sink OGCT True Believers BS Excuses Options

[1976]

[Thread title edited by d from "Non Believers Bullshit Excuses, Need help to sink Non believers bullshit excuses" for clarification]

OK... I am a member of a gaming site at OGN http://forums.ogn.com.au/forumdisplay.php?f=886

And I've been posting links to videos and sites in a thread I started there http://forums.ogn.com.au/showthread.php?t=54722 in the hope some ppl will see the truth.... anyway since I'll have to research this info which I really should do I thought some of you guys could just pump this info out off the top of your heads.

This is a quote is response to me saying tower 7 is the smoking gun, how can you overlook that this... he came back with this...

Speaking as an engineer, and having done a quick bit of reading to familiarise myself with the Tower Seven situation, my thought is "Damn, it took that long for that building to collapse?"

The damage to the building was significant. That's significant from an engineering point of view, i.e. it would have severely compromised the load bearing paths within the structure. While it's true they're still not sure why the thing collapsed, it's also true that there is only very sketchy information as to the extent of damage to the structure caused by falling debris from WTC1. The fact that they've identified a 10-storey high "gash" in the building, that completely destroyed a large chunk of two of the five rows of colums in the structure (and probably severely damaged the third) suggests some seriously unbalanced loads were acting on the building before it collapsed. It wouldn't take much to push that over the edge.

And I wouldn't call uncontrolled fires that burned from 10am until the building collapsed at 5pm "2 little spot fires"...

Not to rain on your parade or anything, but I don't see the need for explosives in any of the building collapses that day. Based on my knowledge of structural design (which is admittedly limited, as I majored in mechanical engineering, not civil), I can easily see how the structures failed in the way that they did.

Can someone destroy this guys narrow sighted conclusion so I can post a undeniable response. Its just a request and theres absolutely no obligation. thx guys

This post has been edited by dMole: Jan 29 2009, 03:01 PM

[Sanders]

Nicepants, it's too bad you weren't born in the 18th century, the Vatican could have used you. ...you know, arguing against that "round earth" stuff. BTW, after I ban you in the next day or two (... I'm not promising anything, but jeeeze this trigger finger keeps twitching and that big red shiny "ban-nicepants-button" is SOOOO tempting!!!) and you come back as a sock puppet, I really like the 'NIST-Groupie' handle idea. I think it would suit you. Whay'ya think??

I'm really really sorry, I'm not going to bother replying to your replies ... they were pathetic. In all honesty, it's my bedtime and I'm a little drunk, that's part of the reason. But, in Winston Churchill fashion, tomorrow I'll be sober. you'll still be a NIST-groupie, grasping at any and all available, however absurd, straw, to defend an indefensible lie which is being utilised daily to justify the destruction of the America that I love.

In other words, you are a traitor to your country - whether for your stupidity or your insolence or inability to detatch from the (unsupportable) premise that the people who work within the US government are all immune to corruption of the worst kind and/or are working for all of our best interests (and that there isn't a league of billionaires behind them all "suggesting" to them what to or not to do on a regular basis). In other words, you are blind. I cannot make you see, nor do I care to try - because I do know basically what you are - although I truly have a hard time comprehending how people like you keep spewing the same bunk day after day with your blinders on tight. Do you??? Whatever, you made your bed, sleep in it. You are the enemy - Washington was smart enough not to let the enemy into his tent. So, when I ban you, it won't be for any "rule infraction". You're too "professional, you won't break any "forum rules", I know that - it makes me dislike you all the more. Nope, when I ban you, it'll be because you are the proclaimed enemy of those of us who love freedom, America and what it stands for, those of us that read up about the country's founders and what they wrote about and thought and why those concepts are at least as important now as they were then, and know that our country is under attack and, not to put too fine a point on it, being 'hijacked' by bankers and lawyers and oil conglomerates and globalists and - whatever, people trying to usurp the last vestages of American wealth for a dime on the dollar ... while invalidating, executive order by executive order, the Constitution.

But you have no idea what I'm talking about. You thinik that we think that "Bush did it". Seriously, Nicepants, you are so behind.