OGCT True Believers Bullshit Excuses, Need help to sink OGCT True Believers BS Excuses |
  |
OGCT True Believers Bullshit Excuses, Need help to sink OGCT True Believers BS Excuses |
 Jun 2 2008, 05:36 AM
Post
#201
|
|
|
aka Oceans Flow Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,211 Joined: 19-October 06 From: Oregon Member No.: 108  |
No. The intelligence is artificial. The stupidity is real.
lol |
 |
 
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 07:28 AM
Post
#202
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 269 Joined: 5-August 07 From: Australia Member No.: 1,609 |
QUOTE (Oceans Flow) No. The intelligence is artificial. The stupidity is real. lol True :-) and I think they need to some work on the physics code too before the release date. This post has been edited by mrodway: Jun 2 2008, 07:30 AM |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 08:33 AM
Post
#203
|
|
 Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Oceans Flow @ Jun 2 2008, 03:36 AM)  No. The intelligence is artificial. The stupidity is real. lol A.I.R.S. then? Or AIRheadS? I think I got the much-improved thread-hopping "Roark" version 2.0- wasn't I lucky? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/doh1.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 08:49 AM
Post
#204
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 2 2008, 05:21 AM) Aside from the ones above, I believe he's up to about 56 outstanding to date? While these aren't necessarily "questions" per se- let's send nicepants away with a nice parting gift to go with the 56+ "dangling" questions above that he/she/it can share with R.oark and their cronies: 276 "Coincidences" http://www.nc911truth.org/911_Coincidences.html Don't say we never gave you anything, nicepants. Buh-bye! EDIT: SNL-Buh Bye!: Fly the friendly skies with these people. http://www.rmwaetjen.com/Commercials.html |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 12:09 PM
Post
#205
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 136 Joined: 11-April 08 Member No.: 3,139 |
QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jun 1 2008, 07:14 AM) Here is a realistic analogy with respect to micepants quote above. 30 train cars hit head on with 70 in the opposite direction. Im sure the first few wont survive on either side. But will the 30 plow through all 70 on the other side one by one? According to micepants, he says yes... No.... The problem with your analogy is it negates the effect of gravity. QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jun 1 2008, 07:14 AM) bright kid huh? And the kid still thinks he isnt getting ripped off in his flight training. If you think I'm getting ripped off, show your evidence. You're wrong, that's why you refuse to support your claim. QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jun 1 2008, 07:04 AM) So.. just to make sure we are clear. You feel people should believe the "highly damaged and heat weakened " (according to govt loyalists) ~30% steel structure "upper floor section" remained intact, almost like a "pile driver" pulverising the remaining ~70% intact structure below which was never comprimised, weakened, or hit by another "767" You obviously haven't read my previous posts if that's what you think. QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jun 1 2008, 07:04 AM) but really, why waste my time with someone that isnt even smart enough to know he is getting ripped off on his flight training... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Classic ad-hom. If you feel I'm getting ripped off, let's see your evidence and I will be happy to show you why you are wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 12:11 PM
Post
#206
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 136 Joined: 11-April 08 Member No.: 3,139 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 1 2008, 07:05 PM) If an object is decelerating, is it speeding up? No. QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 1 2008, 07:05 PM) If an object which previously had an accleration of 32 fpss, now has an acceleration of 20 fpss has the average speed gone up , or down? (We'll use one second as the sample time for the above question) The average (and instantaneous) speed is still increasing, since there is still a positive acceleration. QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 1 2008, 07:05 PM) True or False: Instantaneous speed may be higher at one point during the accleration of an object, and instantaneous speed may also be lower at one point during acceleration? Always true if there is an acceleration present. QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 1 2008, 07:05 PM) True of False : An object is NOT accelerating, and is changing velocity, nad has a speed of 20 fps for five seconds. I'm not sure what you're asking for here. If an object's speed is constant at 20fps, its acceleration is 0 for those 5 seconds. QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 1 2008, 07:05 PM) Does the object which started at 32 fpss, and now moving at 20 fpss (for one second) have a HIGHER avg. speed, or lower avg. speed?Does it have a higher, or lower force? All other factors considered equal, it will have a lower average speed, and force, than if it accelerated at 32fpss. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 01:35 PM
Post
#207
|
|
 Group: Administrator Posts: 7,986 Joined: 13-September 06 Member No.: 49 |
Nicepants has been banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 01:52 PM
Post
#208
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/banned1.gif) 13 days and how many pointless posts later, just on THIS thread?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10741191 Let it not be said that the admins were not patient here. I recall linking the Debate forum rules at least 3 times myself on just THIS thread. Who wants to start a "new sock" pool? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 01:53 PM
Post
#209
|
|
|
∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞ Group: Valued Member Posts: 5,870 Joined: 25-August 06 From: SFO Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (Sanders @ Jun 2 2008, 10:35 AM) Nicepants has been banned. Thanks (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cleanup.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 03:43 PM
Post
#210
|
|
|
Group: Administrator Posts: 7,986 Joined: 13-September 06 Member No.: 49 |
He's banned. What would be the point in suspending him for X-number of days? People like Nicepants are either welcome here, or they aren't.
I have no probem with skeptics challenging us here, I think it's a good thing to review these points from time to time. If I had any inkling that nicepants was anything like a real person and not just a "support the official account no-matter-what, rational thinking be damned" time-waster, I wouldn't pull the plug - but painter said it best... "Apparently for dittopants there is nothing "anomalous" about any of the observed events at the WTC. He has no questions! Fine. It is a free country, or so we are led to believe, and anyone can damn well 'believe' whatever they want. That doesn't mean we have to give them a soap-box in this forum. " |
|
|
|
 Jun 3 2008, 12:46 PM
Post
#211
|
|
|
aka Oceans Flow Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,211 Joined: 19-October 06 From: Oregon Member No.: 108 |
Don't worry Turbo. They're drawing straws or spinning the bottle or whatever to decide who is next.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:26 PM
Post
#212
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
I found this elsewhere, but it seems appropriate to "drop" it here:
"Infant souls may be immature, slow to learn, maybe taking cruder classes in the school of hard knocks, but they still evolve over a lifetime, still question things every now and then, and still show a glimmer of something sentient behind the eyes. Embryonic souls – the organic portals – adapt rather than evolve. The difference is subtle but important. They lack the faculties for introspection, empathy, and have no use for those life lessons that would otherwise be of soul-deep significance. Thus they go through life like broken records recycling whatever meme groove their needle is stuck on. Their eyes have a peculiar emptiness, as though merely ornamental rather than functional windows to the soul. " |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:33 PM
Post
#213
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 3 2008, 05:40 AM) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/yawn.gif) I'm feeling 'debate' withdrawl since the ban. I was really starting to connect with Ricepants. Now we'll never know how the towers actually fell... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/weep.gif) Methinks Turbofan is showing classic signs of pent-up "twoofer rage"- BTDT myself [recently] (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Have you got access to a heavy or speed bag (boxing equipment) around anywhere? Or maybe just go fishin' (I should do that more) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:45 PM
Post
#214
|
|
|
Group: Administrator Posts: 7,986 Joined: 13-September 06 Member No.: 49 |
Turbo, if debating 9-11 minutia with Nicepants was any sort of hight-point in your day, you gotta get out more !!! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/yes1.gif)
Tennis anyone? (At least there's a point to tennis) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 01:52 PM
Post
#215
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 3 2008, 11:37 AM) Here is a two letter swap for kicks: Spicepants (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) Wellllll... on that note, here's one going out to Spicepants: The Spice Girls- Wannabe (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpu0ROaPLQ |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 02:49 PM
Post
#216
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 3 2008, 11:37 AM) We need more GL's to debate with! We need "Shock and Awe" for those fools [or an AIRheadS virus] IMHO. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cop.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 03:43 PM
Post
#217
|
|
|
∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞ Group: Valued Member Posts: 5,870 Joined: 25-August 06 From: SFO Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Jun 3 2008, 09:56 AM) Would anyone mind if I used a new emoticon with each post? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/varoom.gif) Ok, but I have dibs on this one: (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/painter2.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 04:32 PM
Post
#218
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
QUOTE (Oceans Flow @ Jun 3 2008, 10:46 AM) Don't worry Turbo. They're drawing straws or spinning the bottle or whatever to decide who is next. OF, I think that's probably "Untruth or Dare." Quick, someone put a chair under their closet doorknob! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 12:39 AM
Post
#219
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
God Damnit! Who let Roark out of the closet? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/angry.gif)
EDIT: You guys do know that I was joking- sort of... |
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:16 PM
Post
#220
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 5 Joined: 26-October 07 Member No.: 2,408 |
QUOTE (nicepants @ May 18 2008, 01:54 AM) How much weight is the nail supporting in your experiment? Bend does not equal melt. So little fire was present in any of the WTC buildings, structurally a deformation (a hanging pile of twisted and stretched steel and debris) might be hypothesized, but an explosive collapse is 10e-19:1 odds. This post has been edited by guesswhotoo6: Jun 4 2008, 01:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 02:45 AM |
