Replies To Fransan's Welcome, Split from Welcome Options

[fransan]

[quote name='Sanders' date='Jun 11 2008, 07:51 AM' post='10744118']
I'm gonna give fransan the benefit of the doubt here, that his or her earlier comments were hypothetical, as in IF the official story is such and such then you would expect government agencies to do such and such, etc.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) EXTACTLY Sanders thanks, that was the hypothetical point. I´m male by the way. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[fransan]

[quote name='dMole' date='Jun 11 2008, 01:28 AM' post='10744107']

Do you "understand completely" then? Who constitutionally declared war then? On whom and when? Where is the supporting Congressional documentation to support said war(s)?

dMole, I wasn´t referring to a War waged, or declared by the U.S. on anybody. I´m saying that terrorists organizations are at war against the U.S. I could be wrong but I think not only are they at war VS the U.S. but against many other Nations. Britain and Spain have suffered terrorist bombings that appear to be linked to 9/11.

[fransan]

So, you believe 9/11 was a terrorist attack that was allowed to happen. Is that correct? In the jargon, we call that LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) as distinguished from MIHOP (made it happen on purpose). The LIHOP position has many problems, most notably the destruction of the WTC towers. That was not caused by any combination of plane impact and fire; demolitions were used and were necessary to achieve the observed results. LIHOP is debunked if controlled demolition is accepted because "terrorists" could not have had access to those buildings.

So far yes, Painter, that´s what I feel to be the theory that I believe. "LIHOP". (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)
But I´m having great dificulty in accepting the demolition scenarios. I don´t feel convinced, somehow it seems too far fetched for me. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

[Sanders]

dMole, I wasn´t referring to a War waged, or declared by the U.S. on anybody. I´m saying that terrorists organizations are at war against the U.S. I could be wrong but I think not only are they at war VS the U.S. but against many other Nations. Britain and Spain have suffered terrorist bombings that appear to be linked to 9/11.

Oh, yes, they're linked to 9-11 alright ... but not in the way that you think. Did you know that the hole in the floor of the tube-train in London was blown UPWARD (indicating that the bomb was planted UNDER the train?), or that the police there were conducting a terrorist exercise that focused on the exact same train stations that were attacked at exactly the same time ?

I don't know much about the Madrid bombing, but what about the Brit special forces in Iraq that were running around dressed as Arabs shooting everyone, and got arrested, and the military went in and physically busted them out of the Baghdad jail ? Did you read about Ali Mohammed ?? That to me seals the deal ... I mean, here you have a guy, ex-Egyptian military, who was involved with Egyptian Jihad based in Sudan where bin Laden was at the time, moves to the US and joins the Army, soon he's working for the CIA training green-berets and al-Qaeda recruits in North Carolina (Ft. Bragg) and sidelining as an informant for the FBI, meanwhile he's also running bin Laden's security, constantly making trips back and forth to Afghanistan and back, he cases out the African Embassy bombings, for which he is caught, tried and found guilty for in the US. And then he dissapears before his sentencing. Dissapears!

Al-Qaeda is a US operation, it was from the start. The war on terror is a fraud. 9-11 was a hoax. (Duh.)

[grizz]

fransan:

But I´m having great dificulty in accepting the demolition scenarios. I don´t feel convinced, somehow it seems too far fetched for me.

I suggest that you study the work of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and/or Dr Steven E Jones' recently published "Fourteen Points of Agreement..." paper.

[WetBlanket]

Let it happen? By whom? And that sounds any less sinister? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif)

How do you explain the covering up of it since then?