Suv Drivers Made To Park At The Back Of The Store, like black people on buses Options

[Quest]

SUV drivers made to park at the back of the store like black people on buses

http://www.prisonplanet.com/global-warming...egregation.html

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Government fueled alarmism about global warming - which has not occurred in the last 10 years nor will it occur in the next 10 years - is accelerating the creation of new forms of malthusian control over our lives, with the ultimate goal of identifying those who don’t submit to the whims of the climate cult as second class citizens and enforcing a new manifestation of 1950’s style segregation.

The image at the top of this story is from an Office Depot outlet in Austin, Texas.

People who drive those evil life-giving gas, plant food spewing, SUV’s are forced to park further away from the entrance to the store as a kind of collective societal punishment for not conforming to the green agenda.

Gas guzzlers have to park around the back - sort of like black people had to sit at the rear of buses during segregation.

[painter]

People talk about "rights" as if they exist independently of "responsibilities". I regard this as the most fundamental issue of our time. In conjunction with this, people talk about "the individual" (speaking of the "rights" of "individuals") as if "the individual" exists independently of all other individuals and systems on this planet. That is a fundamental epistemological error, IMO. I question whether "individuals" exist except as a concept. Show me an individual human being whose body isn't composed of and life fueled by materials from the world around him. Show me an individual human being whose head isn't full of thoughts that were implanted by the society in which he was raised. Show me an individual human being whose very existence isn't directly tied to the total environment within which he exists.

The problem is that "individuals" don't experience the direct consequence of their actions in relation to the environments upon which they depend for their existence. WE do not experience THE REAL COST of our choices in life. Every time I fill up my gas tank I try to imagine dead burnt babies flowing through the hose -- because THAT is much closer to the actual cost than the digits rapidly measuring my cash exchange for energy.

[Omega892R09]

People talk about "rights" as if they exist independently of "responsibilities". I regard this as the most fundamental issue of our time.

Absolutely painter. 'Responsibilities'. I feel like screaming that word whenever I hear somebody rattling on about their rights. Indeed, I often get hard looks from my other half, i.e. 'she-who-must-be-obeyed' when I have failed to contain myself.

Every time I fill up my gas tank I try to imagine dead burnt babies flowing through the hose...

Or your own countrymen returning home in bags or having left bits of themselves behind.

Sobering thoughts these, that nut-job Michael Reagan should be confronted with these ideas.

[painter]

. . .
Or your own countrymen returning home in bags or having left bits of themselves behind.
. . .

Yes, exactly. It hasn't always been the case that oil is blood but it is the case now and our whole energetic system is dependent upon it.

What really gets me is that this was all known by those of us who cared to pay any attention over thirty years ago. When I was in my twenties I read the writings of Gregory Bateson and Stuart Brand and, at that time, there was a general agreement that building an advanced technological civilization on non-renewable energy was the height of folly. However, the controlling market interests in the oil industry couldn't be bothered with such practical concerns of what would happen at the point where consumption outstripped production supply. After all, from a market perspective, this is a good thing -- more $$ for them! All ecological aspects aside, the simple fact of the matter is that renewable energy is inherently market decentralizing -- and that is why they opposed it, bought up all the alt-energy patents and kept them off market -- all knowing full well that where this would leave us in 30 years is at the brink of global economic, political and arguably ecological disaster. But, again, for them it is a sort of 'so what?' thing. From their point of view the destruction of civilization is a "good thing" because it allows them to invest in the re-tooling of the infrastructure once they've "spent" all the money they scamed off us building a military-industrial-technological complex to "keep us safe" from "terrorists." The richest of the turds can buy up the major aquifers and hoard hundred thousand acre parcels in remote locations, build themselves underground cities if need be -- all paid for with OUR money and OUR blood!

We need to rip the head off the international oiligarchy once and for all and sh*t down its grizzly, guzzling, fascist throat!

[dMz]

Yes, exactly. It hasn't always been the case that oil is blood but it is the case now and our whole energetic system is dependent upon it.

What really gets me is that this was all known by those of us who cared to pay any attention over thirty years ago. When I was in my twenties I read the writings of Gregory Bateson and Stuart Brand and, at that time, there was a general agreement that building an advanced technological civilization on non-renewable energy was the height of folly.

It goes back considerably farther than 30 years p, but you are correct on the SONJ/Rockefeller/ExxonMobil/Shell/BP conglmerate(s?) steering the ship. Albertchampion has aptly named the money that owns said "ships."

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10738860

I've got a "dook" waiting with David R's CFR name on it (if he lives that long- the evil old fu*ker!)

EDIT: Thanks to Sanders- here are many of the "captains" of those metaphorical "ships":

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=379