IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Flight 93: Cell Call Exposed

openminded
post Sep 9 2008, 10:02 PM
Post #21





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 4
Joined: 9-September 08
Member No.: 3,798



QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 5 2008, 12:20 PM) *
Like the OK City bombing (large explosive devices removed by bomb trucks - news footage of first reports - never played or mentioned again) and WTC bombs (news footage of bomb witnesses, audio recordings of large explosives, fireman's testimony of bombs, etc. - shown in first reports - never played again), it is by the initial reports - which are quickly excised and deposited in Memory Hole - that we can identify the cover-up.

Flight 93 Lands in Cleveland - (from Cleveland Mayor and United spokesman). Cleveland Airport Evacuated. Google this story and you will be told - This story does not exist. Well, it existed in the initial reports on 911.

My conclusion. Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. There's no reason not to believe the initial reports that slipped through the cracks and every reason not to believe any of the subsequent lies.

Similarly, the Barbara Olsen phone calls (from which we get ALL of our information about hijackers with plastic boxcutters) - never existed according to the FBI. If these calls were never placed (Olsen's calls have been exhaustively researched elsewhere - but Moussaui trial evidence dismisses them entirely) where do we get the info about the boxcutters?

The perps have painted themselves into a corner at every turn. Why don't more people want to know?

I am trying to follow this correctly. Are you saying that the phone calls that were or were not made on flight 93 before the crash never took place betwwen spouses? There was more than 1 woman who lost her husband in the crash, isn't this true. They never came home after the "proposed landing elsewhere". Now its not just a cover up or mistakes of information, but regular civilians would have to be part of all of this as well?? I'm sure these people would love to have their spouses back , but as of the many interviews with the surviving spouses since 911, those on flt 93 still have not come home. Can you help me with this???
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Sep 11 2008, 05:30 PM
Post #22



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



QUOTE (openminded @ Sep 9 2008, 08:02 PM) *
Can you help me with this???

Hi openminded, have you ever heard that old AC/DC song... goes something like "Concrete shoes... cyanide..."

Ever hear of one James Hoffa? The Atlantic Ocean? Frank Olson? Gary Webb? John "Jack" F. Kennedy? His son John, Jr.? His brother Bobby? Senator Paul Wellstone? TWA800? Dan "DB" Cooper? The definition of "covert op?" The "Kansas City Shuffle?"

Have you ever heard about the often-daily "finds" in the border states of TX and AZ, or South Central Los Angeles and/or Compton for that matter?

Have you ever heard of the Cleveland "UA93" landing on Tues. Sept. 11, 2001? Delta flights 1989 and "89"- same day, same airport?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Leslie Landry
post Sep 12 2008, 02:00 AM
Post #23





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,107
Joined: 2-May 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,264



QUOTE (openminded @ Sep 9 2008, 10:02 PM) *
I am trying to follow this correctly. Are you saying that the phone calls that were or were not made on flight 93 before the crash never took place betwwen spouses? There was more than 1 woman who lost her husband in the crash, isn't this true. They never came home after the "proposed landing elsewhere". Now its not just a cover up or mistakes of information, but regular civilians would have to be part of all of this as well?? I'm sure these people would love to have their spouses back , but as of the many interviews with the surviving spouses since 911, those on flt 93 still have not come home. Can you help me with this???



These people are "professionals". We need to get this straight...they are not ALWAYS great at what they do as you can tell they got a bit sloppy on 911, but the fact is, they "knew" they were going to get away with this..why? because they can. The Government is like the mofia...mid as well be at least in my eyes. The phone calls, May not even had come from the apparent people who were to be on the plane that day. They have ways of copying voices, or finding people who sound like them....who knows what really happened when it comes to the passengers. That will remain a mystery till the end of time, or until Rudy Giuliani has another slip of the tongue.

All we know is that something is REALLY WRONG with the evidence and if the Evidence is clear, then that means these phone calls need to be explained as well as everything else.

There are even people on both ends who say..."well, if it was an inside job. are you telling me that all 3,000 people who apparently died are all in on it and are all living well on a beach somewhere?" NO! the people that died in the buildings, died in the buildings. when it comes to the planes, we don't know for sure about the passengers. The people that say, "well, if the plane didn't crash in the pentagon, then explain all the body parts found?". And my answer to that is, of course you are going to find body parts...people died there...but doesn't prove that these people were on the plane?. "well, what about the DNA matches from all the people that were said to be on the plane that day?" My answer to that would be, prove to me that the DNA was found at the pentagon.

Here's something for you to read if you already havent.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=7591

This post has been edited by Leslie Landry: Sep 12 2008, 02:02 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Leslie Landry
post Sep 26 2008, 12:30 AM
Post #24





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,107
Joined: 2-May 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,264



Hi Mom This is Mark Bingham






Here is Also a recording or CeeCee Lyles phone call without the music.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Sep 26 2008, 06:18 PM
Post #25





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



For me the big question is whether the people named as passengers, other than the CIA assets such as defense workers, were killed or bought.

Of course it is possible they were killed, but the husband of Lyles has left the town they lived in. And went to school in.

I'm thinking the cooperative ones were bought, and that's why the "surviving" family members are so reluctant to talk to investigators. And didn't they sign some sort of contract with the government?

Contract was probably written by Paulson. laughing1.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Sep 28 2008, 07:10 PM
Post #26



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



My searches just found an older cell phone thread. I didn't read much, but there looked to be some good info at:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1948

And amazed, not all defense workers are CIA assets... (Some are higher "pay grade" that that! laugh.gif )

EDIT: Links to much more cell/air phone info can be found at:

T. Beamer Cell
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13003

Madeline Sweeney's Phone Call, Something strange
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1702

One More Cell Phone Comment, Unless I think of another one
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=3253

The Cell Phones Again
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1948

What About Phone Calls Made From Flight 93
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=3892
Reason for edit: Added link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JackD
post Oct 5 2008, 11:12 PM
Post #27





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 295
Joined: 13-November 06
Member No.: 238



Amazed!

i'm as much a skeptic of the OCT as anyone.
however, real people, with real families, who were listed as passengers on UA175 and other flights disappeared that day.

Check out Ellen Mariani's husband. Check out Chic Burlingame, pilot.

I agree wholeheartedly that a bunch of the passengers seem to have spooky backgrounds (an israeli counterterror commando slash tech CEO?) -- and some dont check out well at all -- but some, in fact, do.

note that i dont claim they were killed in plane crashes on 9/11/01 - but they have not been seen since that day.

you could maybe split passengers into three groups --

1) the "real" missing

2) the 'spooky' defense/ intel connected people (Raytheon, etc)

3) the "we cant figure out if these are real or fake people"


check out team8plus.org for deeper looks at passengers and backgrounds/

btw -- agreement phone calls are wacky -- but the big thing wrong with the "mark bingham" call is NOT the "hello, mom, it's mark bingham_ -- given the multiple mark thing, saying his last name may not be a big deal --- but rather the times he says "mom, you believe me, don't you?"
THAT and the impossibility of cell phone calls from fast-moving objects like planes.

try and maintain a cell conversation at 450 mph on the ground, where signal is good -- m,uch less at 10-30,000 feet where it is bad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 6 2008, 05:49 PM
Post #28





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



JackD

Yes, we are in complete agreement.

Thanks for the team8 link--I shall check it out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
albertchampion
post Oct 8 2008, 02:00 AM
Post #29





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 1-March 07
Member No.: 710



jackd gets it accurately, it is the speed that governs cell phone connections.

at any speed over 100nph, no connection can be completed. nor sustained.

unless, at those speeds, you are circling a cell tower.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tinynate
post Oct 26 2008, 02:15 AM
Post #30





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 12
Joined: 23-October 08
Member No.: 3,947



tried using my cell phone at 10' off the ground, to 500', to 1000', to 10k, to 35k in last month app. 20xs, never once went thru, leaving seattle and vegas ... tried texting, never worked ... why does anyone think it would on 9/11 ... voice morphing and lies by paid off loved ones for the bankers cabal to destroy america and the world...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 26 2008, 05:56 PM
Post #31





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Yes, voice morphing gets my vote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
keroseneaddict
post Oct 26 2008, 08:37 PM
Post #32





Group: Core Member
Posts: 130
Joined: 12-September 08
From: An Island off the coast of RSW
Member No.: 3,813



QUOTE (tinynate @ Oct 26 2008, 02:15 AM) *
tried using my cell phone at 10' off the ground, to 500', to 1000', to 10k, to 35k in last month app. 20xs, never once went thru, leaving seattle and vegas ... tried texting, never worked ... why does anyone think it would on 9/11 ... voice morphing and lies by paid off loved ones for the bankers cabal to destroy america and the world...



I have found, sitting in the front of the airplane, that after 8K to 12K in altitude, little or no service.......at lower altitudes, speed makes a big diff.....VOR's/VORTAC's (nav transmitting staions) either are high altitude or low, depending on transmitting power. VORTACS transmit in a cone, I think cell dipolar antenna transmit horizontally.......Any RF engineers here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
albertchampion
post Oct 27 2008, 03:28 AM
Post #33





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 1-March 07
Member No.: 710



i recognize that this will tax some beliefs in the honor, the magnanimity of the usg.

but, it must be acknowledged: the state will kill to advance its interests[the interests of its puppeteers].

as i have observed, as i have writtten on this and other sites, the state will go to great lengths to promote fictions as historical truths.

my guess is that most individuals who tune into this board are as young and as ignorant of history as those on other boards. on the other hand, perhaps it is the case that the inculcation of false history has been so profound, become so deeply entrenched, that very few really know very much about the past.

i have also learned that age has nothing to do with self-imposed ignorance. you could be 62 , 90, and be as ignorant as a 21 year old. ignorance has no statute of limitations.

i know that there is/has been an energetic efffort in the usa to manipulate the historical record. to create and bulwark the illusion that the usa has been the greatest thing since sliced bread for the inhabitants of planet earth.

the usa has been a criminal conspiracy from the get go.

the declaration of independence, the constitution, the bill of rights - all advertising it would seem. all presidents have known that. since washington. that is how it was that george walker bush finally told the truth - all those purportedly noble documents: "just a bunch of [toilet] paper".

and the bulk of the amerikan populace seem to have agreed with him. they have accepted that assessment. and have relinquished their affection for, allegiance to, those documents and the precepts that they promote.

it is a sad time in the usa. let me restate that, it continues to be a sad time in the usa.

as it has been for so many decades, the us electorate continues to be a bunch of homicidal maniacs. and what is even more astonishing, a large number of these individuals consider themselves to be christians. sadduces, pharisees and roman legionnaires would be a more accurate identification.

i know amerika. exhort for peace and brotherhood. the christian zionist amerikan electorate will crucify you with as much alacrity as they crucified joshua. and tell you that they are doing the lord's work as they drive that spike through your wrist.

amerika has been on this race to be tyrannized for decades. it is the undiscussed aspect of the usa. on the whole, it really doesn't want liberty. it wants money - and will excuse any anti-democratic activities if those activities will advance that acquisition of lucre.

i care to close this initial section of this rant this way....i call them obombya and mcclusterbomb.

neither one will be terminating the homicidal ways of the usa. in fact, as we should know, they are both agents of global death and desruction.

perhaps the only diiffference is that one of these candidates will kill more people faster[john mcclusterbomb?]. but that isn't necessarily so, that previous democratic president, bill clinton was as keen on genocidal mass murdering as that german reichskancellor[what was his name, again?].

all the same, both of these candidates have declared their affection for killing citizens of other sovereign nations. citizens of nations that did nothing to the usa.

and, ineluctably, that is what this election is about: who will it be that will govern the usa to kill more muslim noncombatants faster.

that is the distillation of the contest: i can kill more muslims faster. and acquire more weapons to kill them.

this election has become the contest of mossadists.

i must confess, when i listen to obombya, mcclusterbomb, and then i listen to cynthia mckinney, i have become a green.

we should all be writing in cynthia...the real anti-statist candidate. a woman. a black woman. who, publicly, has always refused to believe the official conspiracy story concerning the events of 11/09/01.

the only candidate that considers the official story and says, BULLSHIT.

THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO HAS THE COURAGE TO GO PUBLIC WITH THAT ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING.

and she gets no ink. no air.

let's talk about that.

cspan did give cynthia air. i thought her to be well-spoken. and more knowledgeable than ron paul[who is a goddam twit]. now, why do i say that about ron paul? he opposes abortion. i say, we haven't had enough abortions. think about it.....wouldn't we be better off had ronald raygun, bill clinton, george bush[both] been aborted?

and he believes in the bushit story concerning the events of 11/09/01.

so it goes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 27 2008, 10:33 AM
Post #34





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 3,930
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Too true Albert, too true.

I just voted for Bob Barr last week, but I have my fingers crossed that Obama might be good, and not too compromised.

She might not be willing to serve, but it seems to me that Cynthia would be an excellent cabinet member.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Obwon
post May 3 2011, 10:43 AM
Post #35





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 561
Joined: 29-November 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,712



QUOTE (openminded @ Sep 9 2008, 09:02 PM) *
I am trying to follow this correctly. Are you saying that the phone calls that were or were not made on flight 93 before the crash never took place betwwen spouses? There was more than 1 woman who lost her husband in the crash, isn't this true. They never came home after the "proposed landing elsewhere". Now its not just a cover up or mistakes of information, but regular civilians would have to be part of all of this as well?? I'm sure these people would love to have their spouses back , but as of the many interviews with the surviving spouses since 911, those on flt 93 still have not come home. Can you help me with this???


You probably haven't noted that the CIA, FBI have been long at creating fictitious people.
This is something they must do all the time, to infiltrate and/or plant their operatives,
inside crime and foreign organizations of interest.

Does this help?

Obwon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
albertchampion
post May 15 2011, 10:48 PM
Post #36





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 1-March 07
Member No.: 710



here is a project for some young seeker of truth....start investigating how the survivors of certain commercial airline catastrophes were compensated for their loss.

we know something about the families of the victims of panam 103, but i think we don't know how it has been in the last few years that some important members of that group[the swire family?] have begun to question the official story.

what happened to the families of the survivors of twa 800, aa 587, sr111, ea990?

and the catastrophe that continues to engage my curiosity, as261. how was it that the survivors failed to subpoena the controller tapes involving that flight for that day?

could it be that there is a "plaintiff's" bar that is owned and controlled by the usdoj?

that the number of firms[attorneys] that involve themselves in this avenue of litigation are "spooks"?

i have long held the opinion that if an earnest investigator were to have followed ted olson after 11/09/01, that the investigator would have found barbara.

along with a number of other "victims". the usg has facilities scattered all over this planet to "store" inconvenient citizens. or have you been missing that reality?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zoeken
post May 17 2011, 12:26 AM
Post #37





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 66
Joined: 9-May 11
From: Hampton Roads
Member No.: 5,884



QUOTE (albertchampion @ May 15 2011, 09:48 PM) *
i have long held the opinion that if an earnest investigator were to have followed ted olson after 11/09/01, that the investigator would have found barbara.


I am not 100% convinced that we have not seen Barbara (Lady Booth).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tnemelckram
post May 21 2011, 03:52 AM
Post #38





Group: Contributor
Posts: 767
Joined: 30-January 08
Member No.: 2,690



Hi Albert!

I'll try to use my experience to provide at least my opinions but perhaps even answers to some of your law related questions. I'll assume that the people who are allowed to bring wrongful death and survival actions as a result of the deaths at made a demand for some amount of money, and then agreed to a settlement for that or some lesser but satisfactory amount before filing a legal action that allowed them to use compulsory legal process such as subpoenas and discovery, or filed an action, used that process, and then reached a satisfactory settlement before the case was publicly tried in court. In any settlement, there would be a Settlement Agreement that contains releases of any and all claims related to the crash, confidentiality provisions, and other miscellaneous terms. The plaintiffs have to sign the agreement to get the money, and any defendant would be crazy to pay the money without insisting on such an Agreement in return. Basically, no case is ever settled amicably without some such an Agreement, so there is nothing unusual about such an Agreement being part of the settlement of any specific case.


QUOTE
how was it that the survivors failed to subpoena the controller tapes involving that flight for that day?


If the case settled before an action was filed, the plaintiffs, who could not yet use compulsory process, likely never got hold of the tapes. Among the reasons why the defendants would cough up a satisfactory amount of compensation would be that they were afraid to release the tapes to anyone.

If the case was settled after an action was filed, the plaintiffs almost surely and right off the bat issued compulsory discovery requests for the tapes. Then two things would have happened.

First, the defendants, fearing the release of the tapes, coughed up enough money to avoid having to release them, and the parties signed a Settlement Agreement containing confidentiality provisions requiring everybody to keep quiet about the terms of the settlement. In this case the defendant's biggest concern would be to keep the amount secret so other plaintiffs could not use it as a barometer for the amount of their settlement.

Or second, the defendants released the tapes to the plaintiffs via compulsory discovery process. But then, fearing their contents becoming public knowledge at trial, the defendants coughed up enough money and the parties signed a Settlement Agreement. In this case the defendants would not just require confidentiality about the amount of money, they would also insist that the plaintiffs agree to not publicize anything they learned in discovery, including from the tapes. Often, when the case is in court, a judge supervises the settlement, and the Settlement Agreement is incorporated into an Order of Court.


QUOTE
Could it be that there is a "plaintiff's" bar that is owned and controlled by the usdoj?


I would say not owned, but definitely controlled, and not by the Department Of Justice, but by the Federal courts. The mechanism of control is the confidentiality provisions in the Settlement Agreement, which in sensitive or sensational cases are tied into an Order Of Court. Thus if the plaintiffs or their lawyers talk about things they learned in discovery, such as the tapes, it is not just a breach of the Agreement, it is a violation of a Court Order and the violator of a court order risks being imprisoned and/or fined for contempt of court. So that is the main way the plaintiff's bar is controlled and how this kind of information never becomes public knowledge.


QUOTE
that the number of firms[attorneys] that involve themselves in this avenue of litigation are "spooks"?


Not spooks, but to some extent whores. If you want to settle a juicy death case and get a big fee, you are ready and willing to tie your tongue in the above manner. If the clients, who are your boss, are happy with their money and the confidentiality obligations, then because they are the boss, then the lawyer has no choice but to do what the client wants. You will be disbarred if you fail to follow the client's instructions to settle the case. So this is a second form of control that the system itself exerts over the plaintiff's bar.

As a result of this, there is a third control. Whatever the amount of money might be, it will always look bigger to the client than it does to the big corporation paying it. Such defendants are assured that at some point, they can always prevent public knowledge of things like the contents of the tapes by buying silence..


QUOTE
i have long held the opinion that if an earnest investigator were to have followed ted olson after 11/09/01, that the investigator would have found barbara.


I agree, but the veil of emotional OCT horse shit was maintained long enough to allow the trail to go cold before anyone could get on it.

This post has been edited by tnemelckram: May 21 2011, 03:53 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Obwon
post Jun 24 2011, 12:05 PM
Post #39





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 561
Joined: 29-November 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,712



QUOTE (hturt @ Aug 1 2008, 09:57 AM) *
Did the GTE phones in the seat backs work differently?


As far as I've read they did and they were so unreliable that either AA or UL was
in the process of canceling the contract.

Obwon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Jun 25 2011, 05:51 PM
Post #40



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (Obwon @ Jun 24 2011, 05:05 PM) *
As far as I've read they did and they were so unreliable that either AA or UL was
in the process of canceling the contract.

Obwon


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/amrarticle.html

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html




Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th October 2014 - 05:27 AM