Flight 93: Cell Call Exposed Options

[openminded]

Like the OK City bombing (large explosive devices removed by bomb trucks - news footage of first reports - never played or mentioned again) and WTC bombs (news footage of bomb witnesses, audio recordings of large explosives, fireman's testimony of bombs, etc. - shown in first reports - never played again), it is by the initial reports - which are quickly excised and deposited in Memory Hole - that we can identify the cover-up.

Flight 93 Lands in Cleveland - (from Cleveland Mayor and United spokesman). Cleveland Airport Evacuated. Google this story and you will be told - This story does not exist. Well, it existed in the initial reports on 911.

My conclusion. Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. There's no reason not to believe the initial reports that slipped through the cracks and every reason not to believe any of the subsequent lies.

Similarly, the Barbara Olsen phone calls (from which we get ALL of our information about hijackers with plastic boxcutters) - never existed according to the FBI. If these calls were never placed (Olsen's calls have been exhaustively researched elsewhere - but Moussaui trial evidence dismisses them entirely) where do we get the info about the boxcutters?

The perps have painted themselves into a corner at every turn. Why don't more people want to know?

I am trying to follow this correctly. Are you saying that the phone calls that were or were not made on flight 93 before the crash never took place betwwen spouses? There was more than 1 woman who lost her husband in the crash, isn't this true. They never came home after the "proposed landing elsewhere". Now its not just a cover up or mistakes of information, but regular civilians would have to be part of all of this as well?? I'm sure these people would love to have their spouses back , but as of the many interviews with the surviving spouses since 911, those on flt 93 still have not come home. Can you help me with this???

[dMole]

Can you help me with this???

Hi openminded, have you ever heard that old AC/DC song... goes something like "Concrete shoes... cyanide..."

Ever hear of one James Hoffa? The Atlantic Ocean? Frank Olson? Gary Webb? John "Jack" F. Kennedy? His son John, Jr.? His brother Bobby? Senator Paul Wellstone? TWA800? Dan "DB" Cooper? The definition of "covert op?" The "Kansas City Shuffle?"

Have you ever heard about the often-daily "finds" in the border states of TX and AZ, or South Central Los Angeles and/or Compton for that matter?

Have you ever heard of the Cleveland "UA93" landing on Tues. Sept. 11, 2001? Delta flights 1989 and "89"- same day, same airport?

[Leslie Landry]

I am trying to follow this correctly. Are you saying that the phone calls that were or were not made on flight 93 before the crash never took place betwwen spouses? There was more than 1 woman who lost her husband in the crash, isn't this true. They never came home after the "proposed landing elsewhere". Now its not just a cover up or mistakes of information, but regular civilians would have to be part of all of this as well?? I'm sure these people would love to have their spouses back , but as of the many interviews with the surviving spouses since 911, those on flt 93 still have not come home. Can you help me with this???

These people are "professionals". We need to get this straight...they are not ALWAYS great at what they do as you can tell they got a bit sloppy on 911, but the fact is, they "knew" they were going to get away with this..why? because they can. The Government is like the mofia...mid as well be at least in my eyes. The phone calls, May not even had come from the apparent people who were to be on the plane that day. They have ways of copying voices, or finding people who sound like them....who knows what really happened when it comes to the passengers. That will remain a mystery till the end of time, or until Rudy Giuliani has another slip of the tongue.

All we know is that something is REALLY WRONG with the evidence and if the Evidence is clear, then that means these phone calls need to be explained as well as everything else.

There are even people on both ends who say..."well, if it was an inside job. are you telling me that all 3,000 people who apparently died are all in on it and are all living well on a beach somewhere?" NO! the people that died in the buildings, died in the buildings. when it comes to the planes, we don't know for sure about the passengers. The people that say, "well, if the plane didn't crash in the pentagon, then explain all the body parts found?". And my answer to that is, of course you are going to find body parts...people died there...but doesn't prove that these people were on the plane?. "well, what about the DNA matches from all the people that were said to be on the plane that day?" My answer to that would be, prove to me that the DNA was found at the pentagon.

Here's something for you to read if you already havent.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=7591

This post has been edited by Leslie Landry: Sep 12 2008, 01:02 AM

[Leslie Landry]

Hi Mom This is Mark Bingham






Here is Also a recording or CeeCee Lyles phone call without the music.

[amazed!]

For me the big question is whether the people named as passengers, other than the CIA assets such as defense workers, were killed or bought.

Of course it is possible they were killed, but the husband of Lyles has left the town they lived in. And went to school in.

I'm thinking the cooperative ones were bought, and that's why the "surviving" family members are so reluctant to talk to investigators. And didn't they sign some sort of contract with the government?

Contract was probably written by Paulson. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

[dMole]

My searches just found an older cell phone thread. I didn't read much, but there looked to be some good info at:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1948

And amazed, not all defense workers are CIA assets... (Some are higher "pay grade" that that! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) )

EDIT: Links to much more cell/air phone info can be found at:

T. Beamer Cell
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13003

Madeline Sweeney's Phone Call, Something strange
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1702

One More Cell Phone Comment, Unless I think of another one
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=3253

The Cell Phones Again
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=1948

What About Phone Calls Made From Flight 93
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=3892

Reason for edit: Added link

[JackD]

Amazed!

i'm as much a skeptic of the OCT as anyone.
however, real people, with real families, who were listed as passengers on UA175 and other flights disappeared that day.

Check out Ellen Mariani's husband. Check out Chic Burlingame, pilot.

I agree wholeheartedly that a bunch of the passengers seem to have spooky backgrounds (an israeli counterterror commando slash tech CEO?) -- and some dont check out well at all -- but some, in fact, do.

note that i dont claim they were killed in plane crashes on 9/11/01 - but they have not been seen since that day.

you could maybe split passengers into three groups --

1) the "real" missing

2) the 'spooky' defense/ intel connected people (Raytheon, etc)

3) the "we cant figure out if these are real or fake people"


check out team8plus.org for deeper looks at passengers and backgrounds/

btw -- agreement phone calls are wacky -- but the big thing wrong with the "mark bingham" call is NOT the "hello, mom, it's mark bingham_ -- given the multiple mark thing, saying his last name may not be a big deal --- but rather the times he says "mom, you believe me, don't you?"
THAT and the impossibility of cell phone calls from fast-moving objects like planes.

try and maintain a cell conversation at 450 mph on the ground, where signal is good -- m,uch less at 10-30,000 feet where it is bad.

[amazed!]

JackD

Yes, we are in complete agreement.

Thanks for the team8 link--I shall check it out.

[albertchampion]

jackd gets it accurately, it is the speed that governs cell phone connections.

at any speed over 100nph, no connection can be completed. nor sustained.

unless, at those speeds, you are circling a cell tower.

[tinynate]

tried using my cell phone at 10' off the ground, to 500', to 1000', to 10k, to 35k in last month app. 20xs, never once went thru, leaving seattle and vegas ... tried texting, never worked ... why does anyone think it would on 9/11 ... voice morphing and lies by paid off loved ones for the bankers cabal to destroy america and the world...

[amazed!]

Yes, voice morphing gets my vote.

[keroseneaddict]

tried using my cell phone at 10' off the ground, to 500', to 1000', to 10k, to 35k in last month app. 20xs, never once went thru, leaving seattle and vegas ... tried texting, never worked ... why does anyone think it would on 9/11 ... voice morphing and lies by paid off loved ones for the bankers cabal to destroy america and the world...

I have found, sitting in the front of the airplane, that after 8K to 12K in altitude, little or no service.......at lower altitudes, speed makes a big diff.....VOR's/VORTAC's (nav transmitting staions) either are high altitude or low, depending on transmitting power. VORTACS transmit in a cone, I think cell dipolar antenna transmit horizontally.......Any RF engineers here?

[albertchampion]

i recognize that this will tax some beliefs in the honor, the magnanimity of the usg.

but, it must be acknowledged: the state will kill to advance its interests[the interests of its puppeteers].

as i have observed, as i have writtten on this and other sites, the state will go to great lengths to promote fictions as historical truths.

my guess is that most individuals who tune into this board are as young and as ignorant of history as those on other boards. on the other hand, perhaps it is the case that the inculcation of false history has been so profound, become so deeply entrenched, that very few really know very much about the past.

i have also learned that age has nothing to do with self-imposed ignorance. you could be 62 , 90, and be as ignorant as a 21 year old. ignorance has no statute of limitations.

i know that there is/has been an energetic efffort in the usa to manipulate the historical record. to create and bulwark the illusion that the usa has been the greatest thing since sliced bread for the inhabitants of planet earth.

the usa has been a criminal conspiracy from the get go.

the declaration of independence, the constitution, the bill of rights - all advertising it would seem. all presidents have known that. since washington. that is how it was that george walker bush finally told the truth - all those purportedly noble documents: "just a bunch of [toilet] paper".

and the bulk of the amerikan populace seem to have agreed with him. they have accepted that assessment. and have relinquished their affection for, allegiance to, those documents and the precepts that they promote.

it is a sad time in the usa. let me restate that, it continues to be a sad time in the usa.

as it has been for so many decades, the us electorate continues to be a bunch of homicidal maniacs. and what is even more astonishing, a large number of these individuals consider themselves to be christians. sadduces, pharisees and roman legionnaires would be a more accurate identification.

i know amerika. exhort for peace and brotherhood. the christian zionist amerikan electorate will crucify you with as much alacrity as they crucified joshua. and tell you that they are doing the lord's work as they drive that spike through your wrist.

amerika has been on this race to be tyrannized for decades. it is the undiscussed aspect of the usa. on the whole, it really doesn't want liberty. it wants money - and will excuse any anti-democratic activities if those activities will advance that acquisition of lucre.

i care to close this initial section of this rant this way....i call them obombya and mcclusterbomb.

neither one will be terminating the homicidal ways of the usa. in fact, as we should know, they are both agents of global death and desruction.

perhaps the only diiffference is that one of these candidates will kill more people faster[john mcclusterbomb?]. but that isn't necessarily so, that previous democratic president, bill clinton was as keen on genocidal mass murdering as that german reichskancellor[what was his name, again?].

all the same, both of these candidates have declared their affection for killing citizens of other sovereign nations. citizens of nations that did nothing to the usa.

and, ineluctably, that is what this election is about: who will it be that will govern the usa to kill more muslim noncombatants faster.

that is the distillation of the contest: i can kill more muslims faster. and acquire more weapons to kill them.

this election has become the contest of mossadists.

i must confess, when i listen to obombya, mcclusterbomb, and then i listen to cynthia mckinney, i have become a green.

we should all be writing in cynthia...the real anti-statist candidate. a woman. a black woman. who, publicly, has always refused to believe the official conspiracy story concerning the events of 11/09/01.

the only candidate that considers the official story and says, BULLSHIT.

THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO HAS THE COURAGE TO GO PUBLIC WITH THAT ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING.

and she gets no ink. no air.

let's talk about that.

cspan did give cynthia air. i thought her to be well-spoken. and more knowledgeable than ron paul[who is a goddam twit]. now, why do i say that about ron paul? he opposes abortion. i say, we haven't had enough abortions. think about it.....wouldn't we be better off had ronald raygun, bill clinton, george bush[both] been aborted?

and he believes in the bushit story concerning the events of 11/09/01.

so it goes.

[amazed!]

Too true Albert, too true.

I just voted for Bob Barr last week, but I have my fingers crossed that Obama might be good, and not too compromised.

She might not be willing to serve, but it seems to me that Cynthia would be an excellent cabinet member.