Shanksville Coroner Wally Miller Options

[Domenick DiMaggi...]

Wally Miller preview clip


(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/whistle.gif)

[dMz]

Well amazed,

According to my independent analysis of the data in the "Stark" spreadsheet linked at post #76 above, yes that is what that data alleged to have been from an FOIA request of FAA indicates. If anyone has issue with this paragraph or my findings, then follow the links to that spreadsheet and/or take it up (as in file an FOIA) with the FAA themself. Alternately, take issue with the person who posted that spreadsheet that lists "UAL93" on the "DCA Arrivals" tab- I'm just the messenger/analyst, but that's where the chips just fell.

The "spin doctors" have already alleged that this "UAL93" was scheduled to arrive at DCA, and didn't actually arrive there- (computer error, check in the mail, ...) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Let's take a look at what American Airlines and DCA had going on just recently:

http://www.flightarrivals.com/cgi-bin/WebO...y3WiXt79wC/2.15

(IMG:http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2409/aadcacurrent077cp9.th.jpg)

Hmmm... AA1314 from DFW landed at 17:14 EDT.
AA1360 from DFW was in flight, 20 miles out and due at 18:12.
AA1900 from DFW was 705 mi. from DCA in flight and due at 19:36.
AA1136 was scheduled for DCA at 20:13 EDT, but was still presumably sitting on a runway at MIA
---
Oh wait... was't UA93 scheduled for somewhere across the continent from DCA on Tues. 9/11/2001?

"(8:42 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Flight 93 Takes Off 41 Minutes Late Flight 93 takes off from Newark International Airport, bound for San Francisco, California. It leaves 41 minutes late because of heavy runway traffic. [Newsweek, 9/22/2001; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 10/28/2001; Associated Press, 8/21/2002; MSNBC, 9/3/2002; 9/11 Commission, 6/17/2004]"

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp...te_911_timeline

---

Let me guess, now the apologists will speculate that the FAA didn't have computers back in 2001. Or radar. Neither did the USAF RADES/NORAD system... No C-130s or "Gofers" either...

Aren't those OGCT fools running out of excuses yet? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
---------------------------------------
UPDATES:
(IMG:http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/6821/aadca2077fy7.th.jpg) (IMG:http://img411.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif)

Looks like AA1360 landed at 18:12- right on time.
AA1900 in flight, 284 mi. from DCA due at 19:34: good pilot- "shaved" 2 minutes already.
AA1136 in flight, 869 mi. from DCA due at 20:37- must have been delayed at MIA.

There were 2 more scheduleds now, AA1544 out of Chicago O'hare and AA682 from MIA, but I think you can see the pattern here.

[keroseneaddict]

Well amazed,

According to my independent analysis of the data in the "Stark" spreadsheet linked at post #76 above, yes that is what that data alleged to have been from an FOIA request of FAA indicates. If anyone has issue with this paragraph or my findings, then follow the links to that spreadsheet and/or take it up (as in file an FOIA) with the FAA themself. Alternately, take issue with the person who posted that spreadsheet that lists "UAL93" on the "DCA Arrivals" tab- I'm just the messenger/analyst, but that's where the chips just fell.

The "spin doctors" have already alleged that this "UAL93" was scheduled to arrive at DCA, and didn't actually arrive there- (computer error, check in the mail, ...) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Let's take a look at what American Airlines and DCA had going on just recently:

http://www.flightarrivals.com/cgi-bin/WebO...y3WiXt79wC/2.15

(IMG:http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2409/aadcacurrent077cp9.th.jpg)

Hmmm... AA1314 from DFW landed at 17:14 EDT.
AA1360 from DFW was in flight, 20 miles out and due at 18:12.
AA1900 from DFW was 705 mi. from DCA in flight and due at 19:36.
AA1136 was scheduled for DCA at 20:13 EDT, but was still presumably sitting on a runway at MIA
---
Oh wait... was't UA93 scheduled for somewhere across the continent from DCA on Tues. 9/11/2001?

"(8:42 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Flight 93 Takes Off 41 Minutes Late Flight 93 takes off from Newark International Airport, bound for San Francisco, California. It leaves 41 minutes late because of heavy runway traffic. [Newsweek, 9/22/2001; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 10/28/2001; Associated Press, 8/21/2002; MSNBC, 9/3/2002; 9/11 Commission, 6/17/2004]"

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp...te_911_timeline

---

Let me guess, now the apologists will speculate that the FAA didn't have computers back in 2001. Or radar. Neither did the USAF RADES/NORAD system... No C-130s or "Gofers" either...

Aren't those OGCT fools running out of excuses yet? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
---------------------------------------
UPDATES:
(IMG:http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/6821/aadca2077fy7.th.jpg) (IMG:http://img411.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif)

Looks like AA1360 landed at 18:12- right on time.
AA1900 in flight, 284 mi. from DCA due at 19:34: good pilot- "shaved" 2 minutes already.
AA1136 in flight, 869 mi. from DCA due at 20:37- must have been delayed at MIA.

There were 2 more scheduleds now, AA1544 out of Chicago O'hare and AA682 from MIA, but I think you can see the pattern here.

After everything, why would anyone believe anything the FAA provides? (there goes my license)

And,

DAL588 131664 11-Sep-01 DFW 20010911 13:04 20010911 09:04 DCA 20010911 15:46 20010911 11:46 Commercial MD80
COA258 133125 11-Sep-01 IAH 20010911 13:19 20010911 09:19 DCA 20010911 15:53 20010911 11:53 Commercial B735
N4 198184 11-Sep-01 MKE 20010911 14:13 20010911 10:13 DCA 20010911 15:56 20010911 11:56 General Aviation C560
N242CT 176917 11-Sep-01 FTW 20010911 13:34 20010911 09:34 DCA 20010911 16:11 20010911 12:11 General Aviation FA20
MUS10 202397 11-Sep-01 ADW 20010911 16:49 20010911 12:49 DCA 20010911 17:01 20010911 13:01 Commercial UH1
N2 201596 11-Sep-01 MSY 20010911 18:51 20010911 14:51 DCA 20010911 20:55 20010911 16:55 General Aviation LJ31
FLC79 213449 11-Sep-01 FTY 20010911 22:29 20010911 18:29 DCA 20010912 00:23 20010911 20:23 Other BE30


aircraft were not allowed to continue on to their destinations on 9-11......these show arrivals at DCA long after "Scatana". Looks like either the flight plan database or contrived data......

This post has been edited by keroseneaddict: Oct 29 2008, 09:25 PM