How Easy Would It Be To Fake Fdr Data?, News Flash - No Plane Hit Pentagon |

Aug 5 2008, 11:56 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 139 Joined: 1-October 07 Member No.: 2,291 |
I would like someone who has expertise in this area to answer.
Flights 77 and 11 were not scheduled to fly on 911. I am weary of discussing that no plane hit the Pentagon - for me, that's an established fact. Why to we accept NTSB FDR data as legitimate? ALL other government agencies/news sources have consistently lied and faked data and computer animations to support their false conspiracy theory. If we believed any of that nonsense, we wouldn't be on this forum today. Why do we discuss as fact FDR data for a non-scheduled flight that didn't hit the Pentagon? Wreckage, films, everything - ALL A LIE! My point, once more - since 77 DIDN'T hit the Pentagon, what sort of data is being analyzed? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 8 2008, 12:25 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 493 Joined: 14-November 07 Member No.: 2,482 |
How Easy Would It Be To Fake Fdr Data? I would like someone who has expertise in this area to answer. I cannot say I have expertise in this area specifically. Generally I have some knowledge that can be applied. I can say that the people that build, maintain and repair the FDR definitely have a "test bed" with a computer controlled array of devices that simulate exactly the output of the many sensors on the plane that transmit flight data. How else could you calibrate an FDR? There are only 2 basic parameters that must be met. Each type of data has a range of measurement and a specific order that its sample elements are recorded. The "test bed" would first supply the data during a flight simulation, then test each data file for proper data order and each data element for proper range or fidelity after the flight test. There would be many different data banks of past flights recorded and each element of them would be something that could be used to make up a mock flight for electrical input to an FDR that needed to be tested. Any variety could be combined and then some files could quite easily constructed to test ranges out of those encountered in normal flight to simulate equipment failures and the recorders ability to track them. This post has been edited by Christophera: Aug 8 2008, 12:26 PM |
|
|
|
ogrady How Easy Would It Be To Fake Fdr Data? Aug 5 2008, 11:56 AM
painter QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 5 2008, 08:56 AM) . .... Aug 5 2008, 12:10 PM
Sanders QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 9 2008, 10:56 AM) ...... Aug 5 2008, 12:21 PM
rcane QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 5 2008, 11:56 AM) I w... Aug 5 2008, 08:27 PM
Leslie Landry "Flights 77 and 11 were not scheduled to fly ... Aug 8 2008, 12:59 PM
Leslie Landry Well..this is what i have found so far.
Wikipedia... Aug 8 2008, 04:45 PM
Christophera QUOTE (Leslie Landry @ Aug 6 2008, 06:45 ... Aug 9 2008, 12:52 AM
Sanders L.L., I have heard this before. Thanks for the v... Aug 8 2008, 04:52 PM
Leslie Landry QUOTE (Sanders @ Aug 8 2008, 04:52 PM) L.... Aug 8 2008, 04:57 PM
ogrady Thanks, Leslie. There are numerous other referenc... Aug 9 2008, 12:40 PM
Leslie Landry QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 9 2008, 11:40 AM) Tha... Aug 9 2008, 04:03 PM
dMole QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 9 2008, 10:40 AM) The... Aug 22 2008, 02:41 AM
ogrady Here are some other references to support the non-... Aug 22 2008, 06:44 PM
Christophera QUOTE (ogrady @ Aug 20 2008, 08:44 PM) He... Aug 25 2008, 01:14 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 05:52 AM |