Thermal Expansion? Rating Options

[Sanders]

As federal agency declares 'new phenomenon' downed WTC 7, activists cry foul

RAW STORY, Aug 21

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/BREAKING_NIS...ry_on_0821.html

[painter]

For government employees, it is all about staying "on message." Just as in the case with the FBI's and the NTSB's excuse for not positively identifying aircraft wreckage, "the identities of the 9/11 aircraft were never in question," so, too, with NIST: "the means available for the buildings' collapses has never been in question." They have plane impact and fire and in the case of 7 only fire and falling debris. That is the message and any evidence which falls outside that message is not admitted.

What caused the fires present in 7? Is there ANY explanation emanating from government sources for the destruction witnessed by Barry Jennings prior to 1 and 2 collapse? The answer is "no" and the reason is this evidence falls outside the message and can not admitted.

---

Same thing for the CIT "south side" witnesses. There has not been and will never be any offical government statement addressing the contradiction between what was witnessed and the damage observed because, to be frank, they are logically irreconcilable. One or the other could be true but both can not be true. Since, in these instances, "true" is predetermined by the "message," anything outside that closely drawn circle is treated a) as if it does not exist or b) (should 'a' fail) as if it is without relevance or credibility.