WTC1 Victim, Jim Gartenberg, "Core blown out"- calls ABC7 from floor 86 before Collapse
Sep 16 2008, 11:46 PM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 2-May 08
Member No.: 3,264
This post has been edited by Leslie Landry: Sep 16 2008, 11:55 PM
Dec 8 2008, 09:15 AM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 14-May 07
From: Where I am standing on the RUINS of the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY
Member No.: 1,045
Trapped on the 86th floor of WTC1 by blocked fire doors, Mr James M Gartenberg (age - 36) was just 8 floors below where the aircraft struck. Interesting the way the anchors become silent at 1:46 right after he said that portions of the core had collapsed -- as if something else was going on.
(0:31 in the video)
Jim: . . . . part of the core of the building is blown out . . .
. . . . . . . (1:16 in the video)
Female anchor: What time did you get to work?
Jim: I got to work around 8 o'clock this morning, and . . I think this happened about 8:45.
Female anchor: It did. Describe what you felt.
Jim: I felt .. eh .. I felt . . just the whole build .. I heard a noise, felt the building shake, saw glass blown out.
The glass on my floor was blown out from the inside of the building out; rather than the exterior windows being blown out.
Female anchor: What were you . . .
Jim: the glass fully shattered with the core of the building .. ehh .. and the interior core, ehh part of the building collapsed.
Female anchor: SILENCE
Male anchor: SILENCE
Complete loss of interest by the male and female anchors even though Jim can still be heard faintly talking in the background. The bastards must have turned the sound down. They could have had a nice long interview with him until either his cell phone died or the building fell 53 minutes later. But they didn't give a damn did they? A whole bunch of information about the building and the fires and possible explosions might have been learned, but I guess they wanted no part of any of that. Two people trapped on the 86th floor would at least have had caring human support, but these two asshole ABC anchors apparently just did not give a darn did they?
Or a 9-11 perp OVERSEER shut them down before any more compromising info was leaked.
My guess is there were "directors" in all or most of the control rooms monitoring the broadcasts. Without giving any explanation what so ever, they can give the 'direction' to move on to another subject or caller or another reporter. This direction might come as a mild shock to the anchors (assuming they were clueless) who would naturally view the direction to 'move on' as odd. Why disengage from someone directly experiencing an emergency? But, for them, 'orders are orders'. I'm just guessing here, of course, but that is what it sounds like to me. At about 2:00, after the silence as the male anchor begins talking about bridge closures, you can hear Mr Gartenberg is still talking to someone in the background. His voice comes a bit more to the foreground to the point where he says the elevators have been blown out and then they totally cut away.
This is just about as close to a "smoking gun" as you can get showing media manipulation and strongly countering the official "fire did it" OCT.
I'm stuck on the 85th floor, unh
(0:28) a fire door has trapped us, and the core of the building is blown out.
To you firemen here, what could he possibly mean by "a fire door has trapped us"? Could fire doors in the WTC Towers be remotely locked from say the security center, so they could not be opened? Or was the fire door simply jammed by the explosions in the core or blocked by heavily damaged core sections?
I really wish the interview could have gone on much longer and we could have learned a good deal more. But that is exactly why it was cut short isn't it?
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 12:13 PM|