Flight Data Recorder Research Team Presents..., our first report... |

Aug 20 2006, 04:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,269 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircaft to have struck down the light poles.
We have an animation of the entire flight provided by the NTSB. I have sat through the whole flight from taxi out at Dulles... to the impact at the Pentagon in real time. The screenshot below shows the very last frame of the recorded data. Its stops at 9:37:44 AM EDT (Official Impact Time is 09:37:45). You will notice in the right margin the altitude of the aircraft on the middle instrument. It shows 180 feet. This altitude has been determined to reflect Pressure altitude as set by 29.92 inHg on the Altimeter. The actual local pressure for DCA at impact time was 30.22 inHg. The error for this discrepency is 300 feet. Meaning, the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than indicated at that moment in time. Which means aircraft altitude was 480 feet above sea level (MSL, 75 foot margin for error according to Federal Aviation Regulations). You can clearly see the highway in the below screenshot directly under the aircraft. The elevation for that highway is ~40 feet according to Google Earth. The light poles would have had to been 440 feet tall (+/- 75 feet) for this aircraft to bring them down. Which you can clearly see in the below picture, the aircraft is too high, even for the official released video of the 5 frames where you see something cross the Pentagon Lawn at level attitude. The 5 frames of video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder information released by the NTSB. More information will be forthcoming as we come to our conclusions on each issue. (IMG:http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/44.jpg) The FDR Research Team (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif) Feel free to ask questions and i'll do my best to answer them, barring any speculation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 2 2006, 05:10 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,269 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (driver @ Aug 31 2006, 09:58 AM) The easiest one for you to help us with is to explain with as much detail as possible the complete "chain of custody" of the Flight Data Recorder Information you used to make this conclusion. Any documentation including letters from the NTSB that accompanied the data would be appreciated. A specific named source at the NTSB that provided the data would be helpful as well. In addition, any links to sources to support the claim that the data analyzed was data from Flight 77 provided by the NTSB would also help. Please contact UnderTow and SnowyGrouch for this information. |
|
|
|
johndoeX Flight Data Recorder Research Team Presents... Aug 20 2006, 04:36 PM
johndoeX Its one second.. 780ft/sec.
780 feet represents d... Aug 25 2006, 08:42 PM
johndoeX The csv shows pressure alt throughout
IAD Depat... Aug 25 2006, 08:43 PM
johndoeX And just so there is no confusion about the animat... Aug 25 2006, 08:44 PM
driver We have determined based on the Flight Data Record... Aug 31 2006, 09:58 AM
driver We have determined based on the Flight Data Record... Aug 31 2006, 10:10 AM
driver http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf87/248624_web.pd... Sep 1 2006, 06:31 AM
driver What really matters concerning this topic is if so... Sep 1 2006, 12:47 PM
driver mod edit: driver put a pop up site here.. see 4 po... Sep 1 2006, 02:19 PM
johndoeX The Radar Altimeter was ommitted from the csv file... Sep 5 2006, 11:14 PM
UnderTow QUOTE (driver @ Aug 31 2006, 09:58 AM)The eas... Sep 5 2006, 11:50 PM
johndoeX QUOTE (driver @ Sep 1 2006, 02:19 PM)mod edit... Sep 6 2006, 12:59 AM
johndoeX All debates on pressure altitude please take to th... Sep 6 2006, 06:06 PM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 06:51 AM |