Lloyde England & His Taxi Cab- The Eye Of The Storm, now released Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Get ready for an intense and surreal journey with Lloyde the cab driver while he is confronted by CIT with the north side evidence.

Watch and listen to his reaction with input from his FBI employee wife who he married after 9/11 but was seeing at the time.

See exclusive footage and images of the actual cab as it is today preserved on his 30 acres of property in the woods of Virginia.

Be prepared for an extremely engaging yet disturbing experience.

Home page
high quality megavideo version
lower quality google video version

(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/eyeofstormtitle2.jpg)
(IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/cab%20shots/Picture036.jpg)

[Leslie Landry]

Great Job...like always!

While watching this, the thought came to my mind that maybe to avoid the argument with Lloyd, would have maybe been to ask him to clarify again where on the map he was or bring you to his exact location on the highway before showing him the evidence that the plane could not have been what hit the light poles. i think if you would have done this first..then he would have been in agreement that he was at the location to where the photos/videos showed...inevidably giving him no leverage to change his story.

Either way..i do have to applaud Lloyd for being so patient, i know i would have kicked you out of my house after the first couple times you called me a liar LOL. But this man, no matter what...he stayed calm and polite regardless of what was thrown at him. Thats one hell of a Trooper.

His wife on the other hand...she is ITCHING to talk! shes having a very hard time keeping this tight inside of her...hence the little clues in her words...the little slips of the tongue...trying to be indirectly obvious that she knows something.

Edit:
going back to watch the first interview again..it just REALLY shocks me to see that minimal damage to even the glass of the windshield, with that pole being THAT bent!
Also, In the first interview, Lloyd cant even remember which way he was going..but yet in the second interview...he is CERTAIN of his location. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/doh1.gif)

Reason for edit: Error

[Obwon]

Great Job...like always!

While watching this, the thought came to my mind that maybe to avoid the argument with Lloyd, would have maybe been to ask him to clarify again where on the map he was or bring you to his exact location on the highway before showing him the evidence that the plane could not have been what hit the light poles. i think if you would have done this first..then he would have been in agreement that he was at the location to where the photos/videos showed...inevidably giving him no leverage to change his story.

I agree... Let the evidence do the work on the witness.

Either way..i do have to applaud Lloyd for being so patient, i know i would have kicked you out of my house after the first couple times you called me a liar LOL. But this man, no matter what...he stayed calm and polite regardless of what was thrown at him. Thats one hell of a Trooper.

That's what I find so disquieting about taking a view that he's lying. It seems more like
he's as curious in figuring out what happened as the investigators are. If so, that
would suggest that even he doesn't believe his own story, but how can that be?
If he's confused, and doesn't find any answers forthcoming, or even suggestions
to look further into, his best bet, for his own sanity, is to stick to the story he
knows.

I know, that if I had been driving down a road, and never got to the point, that
people were showing me pictures of me standing at. I wouldn't know what to think,
but I sure as hell wouldn't broach the story that maybe I'd been subjected to some
sort of mind control, since, I believe that would make me sound like a nutcase.
Instead, I'd wait for someone else to break the subject, if they didn't, I'd just
stick to what I knew; that I had never driven that far.

But, since his talk about "conspiracy theory lessons" hit me as something that
seemed very strange indeed, I began the "what if-ing" that needs to be engaged
to find a plausible explanation for the conflicts that emerge. I can't imagine a
situation, where an easily disproved liar, would want to engage a prolonged
examination of what he knew would be indefensible lies. A man who did not
know he was lying, or who did not intend to lie, but discovered he had done
exactly that, would be curious to know how that could be.

So, in that light I've found and present this for your further reading:

Mind Control Information Center
http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrolinformation

This page provides links to a variety of sources of reliable, verifiable information dealing with mind control. Our most basic material is listed first, followed by other resources which delve deeper for those interested in more. We recommend reading through this entire page before exploring the links provided.

Many of the "reliable sources" are newspaper articles from papers like the New York Times,
for example.

His wife on the other hand...she is ITCHING to talk! shes having a very hard time keeping this tight inside of her...hence the little clues in her words...the little slips of the tongue...trying to be indirectly obvious that she knows something.

Yes, that's curious as well.

Edit:
going back to watch the first interview again..it just REALLY shocks me to see that minimal damage to even the glass of the windshield, with that pole being THAT bent!
Also, In the first interview, Lloyd cant even remember which way he was going..but yet in the second interview...he is CERTAIN of his location. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/doh1.gif)

Yeah, he's certain he never got that far down the road. But interestingly, to me
at least, he appears to point to an ideal place, where the car windshield could
be easily damaged, out of the public view. That done, he'd wait there for the
signal to drive down the road. The hypnotist at the site of the downed light pole,
would then instruct him to forget everything that happened back up the road,
and then "inform" him that he'd been driving and his car was struck by the lamp pole
which a stranger then helped him get out of the windshield.

He'd then present the perfect conundrum to waste the time of any investigator
who happened along. That is, unless they find a way to examine this possibility.
Who knows?

Obwon