Lloyde England & His Taxi Cab- The Eye Of The Storm, now released |

Oct 29 2008, 05:09 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 1,072 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 75 |
Get ready for an intense and surreal journey with Lloyde the cab driver while he is confronted by CIT with the north side evidence.
Watch and listen to his reaction with input from his FBI employee wife who he married after 9/11 but was seeing at the time. See exclusive footage and images of the actual cab as it is today preserved on his 30 acres of property in the woods of Virginia. Be prepared for an extremely engaging yet disturbing experience. Home page high quality megavideo version lower quality google video version (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/eyeofstormtitle2.jpg) (IMG:http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/cab%20shots/Picture036.jpg) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 22 2011, 12:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 527 Joined: 29-November 09 From: NYC Member No.: 4,712 |
Craig, you said: "Clearly you are confused.
Lloyde most certainly WAS "made available" and put out there as a face and voice for the event." ----------------- I never said he wasn't put out there etc., what I asked was not why the media didn't document etc., but why the FBI and other officials who swarmed so efficiently to grab the videos so quickly, did not have an official narrative of the cab/pole event that they presented themselves, instead they left it to the media. In any event, best you leave this mind control subject to us armchair theorists/speculators. Get on with your evidence collecting work. This subject should not be wasting your time, tempting though it may be for you to interject. Mind control, hypnotic suggestion etc., will be difficult in the extreme to actually collect hard evidence of, because by it's very nature it remains hidden within the mind of the victim. There's no guarantee that even professional examination can expose it in some cases. So, dealing with such a matter is largely one of attempting to resolve conflicts with speculative theories. It's very ugly work and it's not straight forward at all. Worse yet it can be discovered to be unproductive in the end. But we do know it exists, therefore we look for it when the opportunities present. It is not an area where you should be involved at all. I merely note for those who follow such fare, instances where it might be employed to some effect. After all they've been at it so long, so expert at identifying people who would be susceptible, it's hardly beyond the limits of reason to theorize that they may already have accumulated an army of puppets to use as needs arise. In any event these things will have to be teased out of the mix, there's no blunt assault possible. But, since we know it could be here, there, anywhere, we have to collect and examine these instances. Unlike the detective work you're doing to great effect, there's no set way to pursue "Manchurian Candidates". Don't let us waste your time (I don't mean that in any derisive way), I just don't like seeing you so distracted. Warm Regards. Obwon |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2011, 12:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 1,072 Joined: 15-October 06 Member No.: 75 |
I never said he wasn't put out there etc., what I asked was not why the media didn't document etc., but why the FBI and other officials who swarmed so efficiently to grab the videos so quickly, did not have an official narrative of the cab/pole event that they presented themselves, instead they left it to the media. Yeah I saw that I misread your post so I edited my response. QUOTE Unlike the detective work you're doing to great effect, there's no set way to pursue "Manchurian Candidates". Don't let us waste your time (I don't mean that in any derisive way), I just don't like seeing you so distracted. Warm Regards. Obwon Well thanks and I guess that's my point. The problem is that we don't have a multi-trillion dollar propaganda arm. The only way for us to disseminate the important information we have uncovered is online in forums like this. This very thread is "stickied" here to bring attention to our findings and hopefully inspire people to take action on it. So because the internet and forums like this are all that we really have we can't help but feel compelled to try and keep it on focus, on message, and to not let the discussion get sidetracked into things that you have just admitted are a distraction. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2011, 11:01 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 527 Joined: 29-November 09 From: NYC Member No.: 4,712 |
Yeah I saw that I misread your post so I edited my response. Well thanks and I guess that's my point. The problem is that we don't have a multi-trillion dollar propaganda arm. The only way for us to disseminate the important information we have uncovered is online in forums like this. This very thread is "stickied" here to bring attention to our findings and hopefully inspire people to take action on it. So because the internet and forums like this are all that we really have we can't help but feel compelled to try and keep it on focus, on message, and to not let the discussion get sidetracked into things that you have just admitted are a distraction. Yeah I saw that I misread your post so I edited my response. Well thanks and I guess that's my point. The problem is that we don't have a multi-trillion dollar propaganda arm. The only way for us to disseminate the important information we have uncovered is online in forums like this. This very thread is "stickied" here to bring attention to our findings and hopefully inspire people to take action on it. So because the internet and forums like this are all that we really have we can't help but feel compelled to try and keep it on focus, on message, and to not let the discussion get sidetracked into things that you have just admitted are a distraction. Yes, it is a "distraction" of sorts, but it can be a very valuable one, when there is an on point context for it. So, what I probably mean is "distraction for some". Where the "some" are people doing other valuable work. Here, let me try to explain. I've been on the "net" since before "Air Mosaic", that net browser was still just a gleam in the eye of the code boys. The talk then was that "some day we might break the 14,400 baud barrier" ( yes I still get a laugh remembering that). Of all the subjects you could find on the net, even back then, "mind control" was not only not covered very well, it wasn't discussed because it was either too frightening, or just plainly taboo. If you got into it, you were a "kook" and later a member of the "tin foil cap" fellowship. But those days are coming to a quick end, just like the command line interface did. Now here you have this Lloyd fellow, working against himself, in a failing effort to retain some shred of credibility. He can't do it! Why? He has no ability to point to anyone as responsible for his plight, yet he's "incriminated", as part of a story so big, how could it be that even if he were to admit the poles were planted, it would have little to no impact on anything else in the story? How does that come about? Mind control has the possibility of providing an answer to this conundrum. So, it should be so noted and in no uncertain way. So that others who have similar inexplicable problems, who suspect such operations come out and discuss them. Why? Because we need more information about something that might very well have been going on for quite a number of decades. It's been almost 100 years since hypnotism has been employed for entertainment purposes, yet we hear little to nothing about it. We know that it is powerful, we know it exists, and even though we don't hear about it, we can know for certain that it has been studied and improved. What we don't know is how these new and improved techniques have been employed over the many decades. But, one way it could have been employed, is to deploy hypnotists, who over the years find and collect optimal candidates who can then be used -- How? Imagine an army of susceptible people, already hypnotized and ready to receive post hynotic commands. Like perhaps "Harley Guy" or the Naudets etc. Operators inserted into the story line at various points, to claim they saw planes etc. Is that far fetched? Well, have you noted how the official narrative of 9-11 changed? Time after time the story line changed, but at each turn there quickly appears a new crop of "eyewitnesses" willing to swear to the new scheme of things. It's certainly enough to give one pause to suspect that something very strange is going on. So that is what I'm point out. It's a "distraction" to those who have "better" work to do, like you, who are out there collecting first hand information. But it's something for others, who are doing little more than reading and assessing, to consider. We won't know it's real value until something breaks, but, by broaching the subject now, at least we'll have a frame to fit the little pieces into when some real tidbit of knowledge comes along. But, never the less, we know that MC is real and we know that it could very well have been very useful in an operation like 9-11, to cover trails, create confusion/false leads and the like. Even to create "witnesses" out of thin air. We just don't know where it's been used and/or how. But speculation leads to "testable theory" and that leads to discovery, there is no other route. I'm hoping that you will see the importance of this, and I'm hoping just as well that you'll leave it aside and get on with your work. Also, let me remind every reader of the dangers of this branch of investigation. As I said it's very "ugly", if you keep records you're going to have quite a collection. In that collection answers are going to either emerge or seem to. If they are real answers, well. Consider that this is too valuable an area for the public to have knowledge about. It cannot be allowed. The secret was once kept by the stigmas that attached to such thoughts and that is fading. But until it does become commonplace knowledge, attempts will be made to save it from disclosure. How powerful is it? Well, imagine that you could rob a bank, and have the teller press the alarm, but when the police come, they arrest the teller not you. That's the kind of power we're talking about. It is the single greatest threat to a free society, so thank our lucky stars that not everyone is amenable to it. But the general public has to quickly come up to speed on such issues as it presents, before they break those few barrier down. The search for absolute power is so tantalizing that it is hard to envision a world where such efforts will not exist. Well, I've said quite enough for now. Warmest Regards Obwon |
|
|
|
Craig Ranke CIT Lloyde England & His Taxi Cab- The Eye Of The Storm Oct 29 2008, 05:09 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT Bump. Oct 29 2008, 06:48 PM
lunk Very good!
I liked the method of going from... Oct 29 2008, 09:01 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT QUOTE (lunk @ Oct 30 2008, 01:01 AM) I wi... Oct 30 2008, 01:01 PM
Leslie Landry Great Job...like always!
While watching this,... Oct 29 2008, 10:14 PM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (Leslie Landry @ Oct 30 2008, 03:14... Oct 30 2008, 01:46 AM

Leslie Landry QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Oct 30 2008, 01... Oct 30 2008, 12:42 PM
Obwon QUOTE (Leslie Landry @ Oct 29 2008, 09:14... Jun 9 2011, 09:15 AM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (Obwon @ Jun 9 2011, 02:15 PM) Yeah... Jun 9 2011, 10:35 AM
SPreston QUOTE (Turbofan)Imagine that, several video and st... Oct 29 2008, 10:36 PM
lunk Thanks, that was well done.
Ok, if the event was s... Oct 30 2008, 05:48 PM
Carl Bank QUOTE (lunk @ Oct 30 2008, 11:48 PM) Than... Oct 31 2008, 04:24 AM
Leslie Landry QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Oct 31 2008, 03:24 AM)... Nov 19 2008, 11:18 PM
dMole Lloyde's cab appears to me to be a 1999-ish Li... Oct 31 2008, 02:38 PM
JFK QUOTE (dMole @ Oct 31 2008, 02:38 PM) EDI... Oct 31 2008, 06:05 PM
Craig Ranke CIT Pretend the pole is inside it as Lloyde claimed:
... Oct 31 2008, 04:23 PM
SPreston QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT)Pretend the pole is inside ... Oct 31 2008, 06:14 PM
dMole QUOTE (SPreston @ Oct 31 2008, 04:14 PM) ... Oct 31 2008, 06:24 PM
dMole Although I personally detest most newer Ford autos... Oct 31 2008, 06:16 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT bumped for relevance and importance Nov 11 2008, 05:40 PM
rob balsamo pinned Nov 11 2008, 07:32 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT Thanks Rob.
Has anyone contacted their local, sta... Nov 12 2008, 01:26 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Nov 12 2008, 06... Nov 18 2008, 04:45 PM
painter Wow. I'm kind of speechless after watching tha... Nov 13 2008, 04:00 AM
GroundPounder impressive video....perhaps the effect would have ... Nov 13 2008, 07:27 AM
dMole QUOTE (GroundPounder @ Nov 13 2008, 04:27... Nov 13 2008, 01:58 PM
GroundPounder QUOTE (dMole @ Nov 11 2008, 04:58 PM) Hi ... Nov 13 2008, 02:44 PM
GroundPounder nice work CIT!
lloyde's doorjamb had a bu... Nov 13 2008, 05:53 PM
SPreston QUOTE (GroundPounder @ Nov 13 2008, 04:53... Nov 13 2008, 09:48 PM
lunk Where are the wires?
Lightpoles have heavy duty w... Nov 13 2008, 10:15 PM
Omega892R09 QUOTE (lunk @ Nov 12 2008, 12:15 AM) Wher... Nov 14 2008, 08:16 AM
painter Here's another question: Why is it so importan... Nov 14 2008, 12:07 PM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (painter @ Nov 14 2008, 04:07 PM) S... Nov 14 2008, 12:41 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT Why do we even bother? Nov 19 2008, 07:30 PM
lunk QUOTE (Aldo Marquis CIT @ Nov 19 2008, 03... Nov 19 2008, 11:53 PM
dMole Hello and welcome Marc!
I hope you don't ... Dec 24 2008, 10:32 AM
SPreston QUOTE (dMole)Hello and welcome Marc!
I hope y... Dec 24 2008, 11:32 AM
madtruth Dmole, thanks for moving the post over here! ... Dec 24 2008, 12:13 PM
SPreston Welcome to our search for truth Marc.
This family... Dec 24 2008, 04:03 PM
madtruth Thanks for sending me this info. SPreston. Heartbr... Dec 24 2008, 04:56 PM
CJEAN Hi, awaked persons.
[ If this WAS said/asked befor... Aug 2 2009, 12:15 PM
scott75 QUOTE (CJEAN @ Aug 2 2009, 12:15 PM) Hi, ... Aug 2 2009, 12:27 PM
paranoia im not sure what you mean by investigating his ... Aug 3 2009, 04:42 AM
scott75 QUOTE (paranoia @ Aug 3 2009, 04:42 AM) i... Aug 3 2009, 07:55 AM
rob balsamo QUOTE (scott75 @ Aug 3 2009, 07:55 AM) I ... Aug 3 2009, 10:08 AM
scott75 QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Aug 3 2009, 10:08 AM... Aug 3 2009, 11:41 AM
Obwon Okay, let me be clear, I don't expect Craig ... Jun 22 2011, 09:53 AM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (Obwon @ Jun 22 2011, 02:53 PM) But... Jun 22 2011, 10:47 AM
DoYouEverWonder QUOTE But, one way it could have been employed, is... Jun 23 2011, 03:25 PM
Obwon QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Jun 23 2011, 02... Jun 24 2011, 10:37 AM
onesliceshort QUOTE (Obwon)That's what I find so disquieting... Jun 23 2011, 05:12 PM
Obwon QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Jun 23 2011, 04:12... Jun 24 2011, 10:18 AM
zoeken CIT...
Sorry if I have overlooked it, but, did yo... Jun 24 2011, 01:34 AM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (zoeken @ Jun 24 2011, 06:34 AM) CI... Jun 24 2011, 03:38 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT Bump for Lloyde England. Because guilt is timeless... Jun 28 2012, 09:19 PM
paranoia ironic that you bring him up, cuz by complete happ... Jun 29 2012, 12:11 AM
SeniorTrend QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Oct 29 2008, 01... Sep 16 2012, 05:33 PM
SeniorTrend I'm not a gun person. but in the video, I thin... Sep 17 2012, 11:35 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 11:38 PM |