Video Shows Concrete Core Wall Falling Into Core., No steel core columns ever seen in the core area. Options

[Christophera]

More an more evidence keeps showing up that substanciates the steel reinforced cast concrete, rectangular, tubular core of the Twin Towers. This means the entire truth movement is completely mislead and the post 9-11 psyops is running the truth movement.

Static Annotation of Triangular Concrete pic falling into the core of WTC 1
(IMG:http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/wtc1corefall2.jpg)

Slower animation sequence of the same piece of the WTC1 core wall destruction.
(IMG:http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/core_animation_75.gif)

That is absolutely a huge piece of concrete. The vertical steel seen are either elevator guide rail supports or box columns outside the core.

Here's the original video link so those who want the whole thing can get to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI[/quote]


The psyops has the truth movement using plans from silverstein who made $6 billion from insurance and it is easily shown the plans have been digitally altered to appear as final drawings and also remnants of ground zero prove the plans do not represent the design of the core.

fake plans

[lunk]

Take this as pure speculation, on my part,
but, it's looking more and more that the Twin
Towers were built, with the intention of bringing
them down, before they were even constructed.

If esoteric just means hidden, then yes,
these intentions would have to be hidden,
even to the point of later altering the original blueprints.

Not only designed to withstand hurricane force winds,
and multiple impacts from large aircraft,
the twin towers, were also, secretly, designed to collapse on demand.

It's starting to make sense now, as to,
why the Towers were originally designed to withstand impact from air craft,
they were set to be "pulled", at any time, built into their very design,
and they didn't want them to collapse by a foreseeable accident, at the wrong time!

imo, lunk

BTW thanks Christophera, for your analysis!

[Quest]

Take this as pure speculation, on my part,
but, it's looking more and more that the Twin
Towers were built, with the intention of bringing
them down, before they were even constructed.

If esoteric just means hidden, then yes,
these intentions would have to be hidden,
even to the point of later altering the original blueprints.

Not only designed to withstand hurricane force winds,
and multiple impacts from large aircraft,
the twin towers, were also, secretly, designed to collapse on demand.

It's starting to make sense now, as to,
why the Towers were originally designed to withstand impact from air craft,
they were set to be "pulled", at any time, built into their very design,
and they didn't want them to collapse by a foreseeable accident, at the wrong time!

imo, lunk

BTW thanks Christophera, for your analysis!

Great post, Lunk.
Likewise I think they were built to be destroyed from the get-go. They also needed to make sure nothing would happen to them until that day came, otherwise it would be discovered that explosives were pre-planted into the towers during their construction.

[lunk]

Great post, Lunk.
Likewise I think they were built to be destroyed from the get-go. They also needed to make sure nothing would happen to them until that day came, otherwise it would be discovered that explosives were pre-planted into the towers during their construction.

Thanks,
I'm not sure if many will see
the deep implications and significance
of my humble observation.

It means that the demolition of the twins,
must have been secretly calculated, decades before,
and designed into the original plans,
before the towers were even built.

imo, lunk

[painter]

Thanks,
I'm not sure if many will see
the deep implications and significance
of my humble observation.

Well, I think I do, which is why I have a bit of a problem with it. People "believe" all kinds of nonsense. That doesn't mean I need to go "believing" right along with them. It is that sort of intellectual passivity that has gotten us into this fine kettle of fish.

From the video evidence I've seen those towers did NOT come down easily. An enormous amount of explosive force was required to essentially turn them into powder and steel debris. You are suggesting the towers were constructed "for" demolition and seem to be suggesting that thermate/mite or other incendiaries were built into the construction.

What evidence do you have to support this hypothesis?

[lunk]

Well, I think I do, which is why I have a bit of a problem with it. People "believe" all kinds of nonsense. That doesn't mean I need to go "believing" right along with them. It is that sort of intellectual passivity that has gotten us into this fine kettle of fish.

From the video evidence I've seen those towers did NOT come down easily. An enormous amount of explosive force was required to essentially turn them into powder and steel debris. You are suggesting the towers were constructed "for" demolition and seem to be suggesting that thermate/mite or other incendiaries were built into the construction.

What evidence do you have to support this hypothesis?

Evidence?
Yes, isn't that what Christophera is posting?
He seems to have studied the core in great detail, and I remember watching the
original building of the towers, long before 9/11, and specifically remember the part about how they were built with the possibility of aircraft collision, keeping in mind the collision of the B52 bomber that hit the empire state building in the fog.
Could the buildings, like my card houses, have been designed to collapse?
If they were, whoever authorized this, would have to make doubly sure, that an
unexpected breeze, or accidental flying object, couldn't prematurely, initiate that collapse.

...My card mansion looked very strong and could only be taken down by a carefully rolled marble aimed at a specific location.
This was not an easy design for me to achieve.
It would have been much simpler if I had a team of architects, that I could give instructions to, on my idea of building a very strong looking card house that could be completely collapsed, easily, but only by intention, not by mom walking by with the vacuum cleaner, or my sister, pathetically, throwing a block.

imo, lunk