Video Shows Concrete Core Wall Falling Into Core., No steel core columns ever seen in the core area. Options

[Christophera]

More an more evidence keeps showing up that substanciates the steel reinforced cast concrete, rectangular, tubular core of the Twin Towers. This means the entire truth movement is completely mislead and the post 9-11 psyops is running the truth movement.

Static Annotation of Triangular Concrete pic falling into the core of WTC 1
(IMG:http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/wtc1corefall2.jpg)

Slower animation sequence of the same piece of the WTC1 core wall destruction.
(IMG:http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/core_animation_75.gif)

That is absolutely a huge piece of concrete. The vertical steel seen are either elevator guide rail supports or box columns outside the core.

Here's the original video link so those who want the whole thing can get to it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI[/quote]


The psyops has the truth movement using plans from silverstein who made $6 billion from insurance and it is easily shown the plans have been digitally altered to appear as final drawings and also remnants of ground zero prove the plans do not represent the design of the core.

fake plans

[dMz]

Well Primacord detonates at about 7000 m/s (or about 7 times the velocity of most rifles), so I think that the top-down, bottom-up thing has been a red herring all along regarding a building about 1400 feet high. Radio detonators would likely be computer controlled and operate at nearly the speed of light, so that's a non-issue too. I would have put the operational control center on that 23rd floor of WTC7 too, with its bullet resistant glass and separate oxygen supply.

http://www.dynonobel.com/NR/rdonlyres/209B...0/Primacord.pdf

With all the talk of "fireproofing" and the post-1993 bombing "reconstruction," I would think that all sorts of "modifications" could have been made to the WTC.

Painter is right on the energetics and forces needed, though. I haven't seen a good explanation yet for this fact:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10747793

From what I saw in the "collapses" and the ~30 foot length debris afterwards, I would think that charges would have been applied every 3 stories (or possibly closer). The overlap of the perimeter column panels would complicate things a little, but I would think the joints would be the places to attack there, and the perimeter panels shown flying in various photos would tend to support this.

[stannrodd]

Well Primacord detonates at about 7000 m/s (or about 7 times the velocity of most rifles), so I think that the top-down, top-up thing has been a red herring all along regarding a building about 1400 feet high. Radio detonators would likely be computer controlled and operate at nearly the speed of light, so that's a non-issue too. I would have put the operational control center on that 23rd floor of WTC7 too, with its bullet resistant glass and separate oxygen supply.

http://www.dynonobel.com/NR/rdonlyres/209B...0/Primacord.pdf

With all the talk of "fireproofing" and the post-1993 bombing "reconstruction," I would think that all sorts of "modifications" could have been made to the WTC.

Painter is right on the energetics and forces needed, though. I haven't seen a good explanation yet for this fact:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10747793

From what I saw in the "collapses" and the ~30 foot length debris afterwards, I would think that charges would have been applied every 3 stories (or possibly closer). The overlap of the perimeter column panels would complicate things a little, but I would think the joints would be the places to attack there, and the perimeter panels shown flying in various photos would tend to support this.

The thread has this title

Video Shows Concrete Core Wall Falling Into Core.

This is simply Chris's opinion.

Some of you guys (real professionals) are being sucked in by a clever con artist..

Try this from my own forums.. I have followed Chris and his activities on the internet for five years .. he calls me a stalker .. I'm interested in Truth purveyors not bullshit artists. IMO Chris is pushing Poo !!

Here you go.. read it slowly.

http://psytationstation.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=652

If there is anything in this posted link which is not true .. can you explain it here .. or join up at my forum and do so there.

I didn't intend this to be an ad hominum and it isn't really, but when there is clear evidence of BULLSHIT .. then it needs to be exposed.

I was only ever a student pilot and an aircraft enthusiast. I know how flying works in a Cessna .. that's about it except for the odd slope soaring glider.

Sincerely
Stann

[lunk]

Try this from my own forums.. I have followed Chris and his activities on the internet for five years ..
(snip

http://psytationstation.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=652

Dude, are you saying that you followed someone on the internet for 5 years?
That would seriously frustrate anyone, especially if you kept popping up in forums
criticizing that individual, as in your link.

I went to the link, on your own forum, where you wrote a prophetic like post, after the incident, lambasting that same individual, with your same points, only to achieve in
getting Painter all freaked about Christophoria, again.
Ugh.

What are you trying to achieve?

imo, lunk