The North Approach, Technical Supplement to "9/11: The North Flight Path" |

Jan 4 2009, 06:50 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
THE NORTH APPROACH TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT TO: 9/11: THE NORTH FLIGHT PATH AERODYNAMICALLY POSSIBLE – WITNESS COMPATIBLE January 4, 2009 By Rob Balsamo and Tino Desideri Contact: pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org (rev 1.0) This technical paper is a supplement to the video presentation "The North Flight Path: Aerodynamically Possible – Witness Compatible" and will serve to prove that a North Approach over the Naval Annex and north of the Citgo gas station is aerodynamically possible and consistent with witness statements. The analysis is based on USGS survey of the Arlington area using scale modeling of buildings, obstacles, elevation and overall witness statements who independently corroborate placement of an aircraft opposite the physical damage observed at the Pentagon on the 11th of September 2001. More than one flight path will be evaluated to show best and worst case scenarios taking witness statements into consideration. Considerations for Calculations; - Aircraft type is unknown - Stall Speed impossible to determine as outlined in the film. - "Bank Angle" analysis based on level flight. - "Pull Out" analysis based on Bank Angle and vertical acceleration required in the vertical plane to clear all obstacles and be consistent with witness statements. - Speed: Flight Data Recorder (FDR) information not available for airborne vehicle witnessed on North Approach. Exact speed is impossible to determine based on witness statements. Several speeds are offered in this analysis including that of the Flight Data Recorder information plotted by the NTSB for this segment of flight in which many parameters conflict with a Pentagon "Impact". When using FDR information as plotted by the NTSB it would be technically inaccurate to focus on one parameter and ignore the rest for such a segment. Therefore, the reader must also understand FDR altitude as plotted by the NTSB for this segment has to be taken into consideration which shows too high to hit the Pentagon*. With that said, we will still demonstrate how even the highest and final FDR speed plotted by the NTSB at less than 1 second west of the pentagon wall, is still aerodynamically possible for the North Approach based on bank and G loading for conventional aircraft, as witnessed. All other speed data as plotted by the NTSB for this segment will lower aerodynamic requirements than those demonstrated in this paper utilizing final FDR speed. * See "Pandora's Black Box – Chapter Two – Flight Of American 77" Download attached pdf for full paper. Thank you.
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 5 2009, 11:24 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Contributor Posts: 766 Joined: 30-January 08 Member No.: 2,690 |
This is a great addition Rob! I was unable to download it and would like to have a look. Probably a technical issue.
QUOTE - Aircraft type is unknown A wise parameter. This has become quite interesting to me. It seems like any type of plane could have been involved - maybe some kind of souped-up airliner or pseudo airliner or other military craft. Maybe with remote guidance assist. |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2009, 11:40 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
This is a great addition Rob! I was unable to download it and would like to have a look. Probably a technical issue. Should be fixed now... try it again. Sorry about that.. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
rob balsamo The North Approach Jan 4 2009, 06:50 PM
painter Was able to DL the .pdf -- LOOKS REALLY GOOD!... Jan 4 2009, 11:55 PM
rob balsamo Thanks Michael.... Jan 5 2009, 01:59 AM
SPreston I'M posting the tech paper to ATS. Is that OK ... Jan 6 2009, 12:58 AM
rob balsamo Post it anywhere you wish. Its in the public domai... Jan 6 2009, 01:04 AM
SPreston QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 6 2009, 12:04 AM... Jan 6 2009, 01:15 AM
rob balsamo I had to re-upload the file. So anyone who has lin... Jan 6 2009, 04:26 AM
Janusaur Cool!
I noticed professor Dewdney was listed ... Jan 6 2009, 05:39 AM
Craig Ranke CIT It's a fair question but I think it should be ... Jan 6 2009, 11:23 AM
rob balsamo I had to do another upload... we had the date set ... Jan 6 2009, 11:28 AM
wstutt Hi Rob,
I tried clicking on the link to the paper... Feb 20 2009, 04:23 AM
rob balsamo QUOTE (wstutt @ Feb 20 2009, 03:23 AM) Hi... Feb 20 2009, 04:56 AM
wstutt QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Feb 25 2009, 08:56 A... Feb 20 2009, 08:34 PM
dMole I just got a right click "save as" to wo... Feb 20 2009, 04:34 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 01:45 PM |