Addressing Gl Arguments Regarding Noc Tech Paper |

Jan 6 2009, 12:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Looks like there is only one reply so far, out of much noise being generated at the GL site... so we'll address the first "legit" reply to our NoC paper...
QUOTE Didn't 911files show that the radii PfT was using in their last video were fudged? Looks like they're still using those same radii in this paper. ETA: Why, yes, he did... CODE http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=4324901&postcount=8 Actually, no, he didnt. 1. It appears Farmer cherry picked one "radius" for his claim, not "radii". Yet refuses to show exactly which "radius" he feel is "fudged". 2. Based on Farmers final arithmetic for our alleged "fudged" radius, Farmer calculated his alleged G Load based on bank angle which Farmer claims is accurate - QUOTE Farmer calculates G load for given bank... Banking angle = 62 degrees g-force = 1.9 Its far from accurate... First, Farmer doesnt specify speed to obtain such a bank angle. Second, Farmer's arithmetic is wrong regarding G load for a given bank angle. Every pilot from a student onward knows the rule of thumb that a 60 deg bank is 2.0G. How does Farmer calculate less G load for a higher bank? I'll tell you why, its because Farmer doesnt understand basic vector analysis as outlined in the paper, doesnt understand how to calculate a sag of an arc, nor is he able to determine a proper radii. Looks like Farmer needs the chart as his "maths" is pathetic. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10761451 Or perhaps he will actually learn something from the tech paper regarding vector analysis. n = 1/cos(62) n = 2.13 G's Farmer is more than 10% off with his "maths". |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 6 2009, 04:50 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
Back on topic, I've got a minor gripe with the NoC Tech Paper Rob:
I prefer the boldface [vector] version, but "G" is usually written in italic lowercase. http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictG.html -------------------- g a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface (sea level). The actual acceleration of gravity varies from place to place, depending on latitude, altitude, and local geology. The symbol g is often used informally as a unit of acceleration. By agreement among physicists, the standard acceleration of gravity gn is defined to be exactly 9.806 65 meters per second per second (m/s2), or about 32.174 05 feet per second per second. At latitude p, a conventional value of the acceleration of gravity at sea level is given by the International Gravity Formula, g(p)=9.7803267714(1+0.00193185138639sin2(p))/√(1-0.0069437999013sin2(p)). The variation, caused by the oblateness of the Earth and the accleration we experience due to the rotation of the Earth, is about half a percent, from 9.780 327 m/s2 at the Equator to 9.833 421 m/s2 at the poles. The symbol g was used as a unit first in aeronautical and space engineering, where it is important to limit the accelerations experienced by the crew members of aircraft and spaceships: the "g forces," as they are called. This use became familiar through the space programs, and now a variety of accelerations are measured in g's. The names gee and grav is also used for this unit. Note that g is also the symbol for the gram. |
|
|
|
rob balsamo Addressing Gl Arguments Regarding Noc Tech Paper Jan 6 2009, 12:21 PM
rob balsamo Initial thoughts from Farmer: bolding excerpts fro... Jan 6 2009, 02:56 PM
rob balsamo JayDuh once again lives up to the "Duh" ... Jan 6 2009, 03:27 PM
rob balsamo Farmer rant regarding debate...
QUOTE For the ben... Jan 6 2009, 04:10 PM
dMole Hi 7 guests! Jan 6 2009, 04:37 PM
rob balsamo Just want to quickly address this (even though off... Jan 6 2009, 04:44 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 6 2009, 03:50 PM) Back... Jan 6 2009, 05:03 PM
rob balsamo Beachnut is imploding.... again.
"but.. .but... Jan 6 2009, 05:15 PM
rob balsamo I see the infamous "Gravy" - NYC Tour Gu... Jan 6 2009, 05:40 PM
rob balsamo ok.. wont spend too much time on this... but
Curt... Jan 6 2009, 06:25 PM
rob balsamo JayDuh says...
QUOTE As I said before.... it seem... Jan 6 2009, 07:58 PM
Craig Ranke CIT So apparently the all agree that your math is accu... Jan 6 2009, 09:59 PM
rob balsamo QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Jan 6 2009, 08:5... Jan 6 2009, 10:11 PM
Craig Ranke CIT QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 7 2009, 02:11 AM... Jan 6 2009, 11:11 PM
rob balsamo Beachnut claims -
QUOTE You posted an idiotic pap... Jan 6 2009, 11:07 PM
rob balsamo The NYC Tour Guide Mark "Gravy" Roberts ... Jan 6 2009, 11:14 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT Mod Edit: The following twwo posts were split from... Jan 7 2009, 02:11 PM
rob balsamo Thanks Aldo. Good to see you back posting... guess... Jan 7 2009, 02:40 PM
rob balsamo JayDuh continuing to live up to his Duh...
QUOTE ... Jan 7 2009, 04:47 PM
dMole QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 7 2009, 01:47 PM... Jan 7 2009, 06:12 PM
dMole QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 7 2009, 03:12 PM) Here... Jan 22 2009, 07:06 PM
dMole You know, there is a good reason that one of the f... Jan 7 2009, 05:03 PM
rob balsamo Also, JayDuh is wrong with his claims of Farmer ca... Jan 7 2009, 05:25 PM
rob balsamo I didnt really cross check JayDuh's actual ari... Jan 7 2009, 07:04 PM
rob balsamo Farmer rants...
"I can't help it if P4T ... Jan 7 2009, 08:32 PM
dMole HINT for J. Farmer: The US Navy and "old tim... Jan 7 2009, 09:02 PM
rob balsamo JayDuh still living up to his name....
QUOTE I be... Jan 8 2009, 09:02 PM
dMole Although I already posted this information long ag... Jan 14 2009, 10:06 AM
dMole Well, it looks like ol' "nicepants" ... Jan 15 2009, 02:35 AM
rob balsamo I see now the idiots over there think we get our r... Jan 18 2009, 01:06 AM
tnemelckram QUOTE I see now the idiots over there think we get... Jan 18 2009, 03:32 AM
dMole On things technical, the Farmer recently claimed (... Jan 18 2009, 02:18 AM
rob balsamo Dont waste your time dMole. It is clear Farmer is ... Jan 18 2009, 03:34 AM
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 03:38 AM |