IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Addressing Gl Arguments Regarding Noc Tech Paper

rob balsamo
post Jan 6 2009, 12:21 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



Looks like there is only one reply so far, out of much noise being generated at the GL site... so we'll address the first "legit" reply to our NoC paper...

QUOTE
Didn't 911files show that the radii PfT was using in their last video were fudged? Looks like they're still using those same radii in this paper.

ETA: Why, yes, he did...


CODE
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=4324901&postcount=8


Actually, no, he didnt.

1. It appears Farmer cherry picked one "radius" for his claim, not "radii". Yet refuses to show exactly which "radius" he feel is "fudged".

2. Based on Farmers final arithmetic for our alleged "fudged" radius, Farmer calculated his alleged G Load based on bank angle which Farmer claims is accurate -

QUOTE
Farmer calculates G load for given bank...

Banking angle = 62 degrees
g-force = 1.9


Its far from accurate...

First, Farmer doesnt specify speed to obtain such a bank angle.

Second, Farmer's arithmetic is wrong regarding G load for a given bank angle.

Every pilot from a student onward knows the rule of thumb that a 60 deg bank is 2.0G. How does Farmer calculate less G load for a higher bank? I'll tell you why, its because Farmer doesnt understand basic vector analysis as outlined in the paper, doesnt understand how to calculate a sag of an arc, nor is he able to determine a proper radii.

Looks like Farmer needs the chart as his "maths" is pathetic.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....&p=10761451

Or perhaps he will actually learn something from the tech paper regarding vector analysis.

n = 1/cos(62)

n = 2.13 G's

Farmer is more than 10% off with his "maths".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dMz
post Jan 6 2009, 04:50 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Back on topic, I've got a minor gripe with the NoC Tech Paper Rob:

I prefer the boldface [vector] version, but "G" is usually written in italic lowercase.

http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictG.html

--------------------
g
a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface (sea level). The actual acceleration of gravity varies from place to place, depending on latitude, altitude, and local geology. The symbol g is often used informally as a unit of acceleration. By agreement among physicists, the standard acceleration of gravity gn is defined to be exactly 9.806 65 meters per second per second (m/s2), or about 32.174 05 feet per second per second. At latitude p, a conventional value of the acceleration of gravity at sea level is given by the International Gravity Formula,
g(p)=9.7803267714(1+0.00193185138639sin2(p))/√(1-0.0069437999013sin2(p)). The variation, caused by the oblateness of the Earth and the accleration we experience due to the rotation of the Earth, is about half a percent, from 9.780 327 m/s2 at the Equator to 9.833 421 m/s2 at the poles.
The symbol g was used as a unit first in aeronautical and space engineering, where it is important to limit the accelerations experienced by the crew members of aircraft and spaceships: the "g forces," as they are called. This use became familiar through the space programs, and now a variety of accelerations are measured in g's. The names gee and grav is also used for this unit. Note that g is also the symbol for the gram.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- rob balsamo   Addressing Gl Arguments Regarding Noc Tech Paper   Jan 6 2009, 12:21 PM
- - rob balsamo   Initial thoughts from Farmer: bolding excerpts fro...   Jan 6 2009, 02:56 PM
- - rob balsamo   JayDuh once again lives up to the "Duh" ...   Jan 6 2009, 03:27 PM
- - rob balsamo   Farmer rant regarding debate... QUOTE For the ben...   Jan 6 2009, 04:10 PM
- - dMole   Hi 7 guests!   Jan 6 2009, 04:37 PM
- - rob balsamo   Just want to quickly address this (even though off...   Jan 6 2009, 04:44 PM
- - dMole   Back on topic, I've got a minor gripe with the...   Jan 6 2009, 04:50 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 6 2009, 03:50 PM) Back...   Jan 6 2009, 05:03 PM
- - rob balsamo   Beachnut is imploding.... again. "but.. .but...   Jan 6 2009, 05:15 PM
- - rob balsamo   I see the infamous "Gravy" - NYC Tour Gu...   Jan 6 2009, 05:40 PM
- - rob balsamo   ok.. wont spend too much time on this... but Curt...   Jan 6 2009, 06:25 PM
- - rob balsamo   JayDuh says... QUOTE As I said before.... it seem...   Jan 6 2009, 07:58 PM
- - Craig Ranke CIT   So apparently the all agree that your math is accu...   Jan 6 2009, 09:59 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Jan 6 2009, 08:5...   Jan 6 2009, 10:11 PM
|- - Craig Ranke CIT   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 7 2009, 02:11 AM...   Jan 6 2009, 11:11 PM
- - rob balsamo   Beachnut claims - QUOTE You posted an idiotic pap...   Jan 6 2009, 11:07 PM
- - rob balsamo   The NYC Tour Guide Mark "Gravy" Roberts ...   Jan 6 2009, 11:14 PM
- - Aldo Marquis CIT   Mod Edit: The following twwo posts were split from...   Jan 7 2009, 02:11 PM
- - rob balsamo   Thanks Aldo. Good to see you back posting... guess...   Jan 7 2009, 02:40 PM
- - rob balsamo   JayDuh continuing to live up to his Duh... QUOTE ...   Jan 7 2009, 04:47 PM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 7 2009, 01:47 PM...   Jan 7 2009, 06:12 PM
|- - dMole   QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 7 2009, 03:12 PM) Here...   Jan 22 2009, 07:06 PM
- - dMole   You know, there is a good reason that one of the f...   Jan 7 2009, 05:03 PM
- - rob balsamo   Also, JayDuh is wrong with his claims of Farmer ca...   Jan 7 2009, 05:25 PM
- - rob balsamo   I didnt really cross check JayDuh's actual ari...   Jan 7 2009, 07:04 PM
- - rob balsamo   Farmer rants... "I can't help it if P4T ...   Jan 7 2009, 08:32 PM
- - dMole   HINT for J. Farmer: The US Navy and "old tim...   Jan 7 2009, 09:02 PM
- - rob balsamo   JayDuh still living up to his name.... QUOTE I be...   Jan 8 2009, 09:02 PM
- - dMole   Although I already posted this information long ag...   Jan 14 2009, 10:06 AM
- - dMole   Well, it looks like ol' "nicepants" ...   Jan 15 2009, 02:35 AM
- - rob balsamo   I see now the idiots over there think we get our r...   Jan 18 2009, 01:06 AM
|- - tnemelckram   QUOTE I see now the idiots over there think we get...   Jan 18 2009, 03:32 AM
- - dMole   On things technical, the Farmer recently claimed (...   Jan 18 2009, 02:18 AM
- - rob balsamo   Dont waste your time dMole. It is clear Farmer is ...   Jan 18 2009, 03:34 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:19 PM